"Normal" Upgrade Times
#41
There will be a significant realignment bid next month - 2-3 bases will close. That will cause a HUGE ripple effect throughout the system as senior guys move to MEM kicking them out and the more junior guys bump all those junior captains on the 777 and 767 and more and more. Realignment bids while we are shrinking the system will be hugely negative - a LOT of guys are going to get moved.
Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.
If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.
If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 132
There will be a significant realignment bid next month - 2-3 bases will close. That will cause a HUGE ripple effect throughout the system as senior guys move to MEM kicking them out and the more junior guys bump all those junior captains on the 777 and 767 and more and more. Realignment bids while we are shrinking the system will be hugely negative - a LOT of guys are going to get moved.
Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.
If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.
If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,109
Yes I have and bumps are absolutely allowed. 2015 changes just made it so it can all happen in a single bid. There will be a MAX and MIN for each base. If displaced, your seniority still allows you to go to another base and if that makes that base number above the MAX then the bottom guy will get kicked out. Go back and read it again.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,109
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,109
We've been in the "end game" of negotiations since at least October - when we petitioned the NMB. We still have a ways to go to get a TA that this crew force will accept.
#46
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 447
There will be a significant realignment bid next month - 2-3 bases will close. That will cause a HUGE ripple effect throughout the system as senior guys move to MEM kicking them out and the more junior guys bump all those junior captains on the 777 and 767 and more and more. Realignment bids while we are shrinking the system will be hugely negative - a LOT of guys are going to get moved.
Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.
If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
Of course we are overmanned - we were significantly overmanned in January and that was before all this new hire training ends shortly - all those instructors will be returning to the line. Way too many near retirees are hanging on longer than they projected hoping for a significant bump in a TA that may never come and if it does, may never pass.
If I were in my first 1-3 years here and had a competitive resume, I'd certainly look at DL or UAL. Their future is a lot brighter.
#48
We are still training out positions from the HKG closure from almost two years ago. But yea, sure, we are closing 2-3 bases. So the company wants to make drastic changes that will cause training events for the next three years or more? McKinsey definitely sees the fault in that logic.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 447
We are still training out positions from the HKG closure from almost two years ago. But yea, sure, we are closing 2-3 bases. So the company wants to make drastic changes that will cause training events for the next three years or more? McKinsey definitely sees the fault in that logic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post