Thoughts...
#71
#72
Note that long-run changes in labor force participation may reflect secular economic trends that are unrelated to the overall health of the economy. For instance, demographic changes such as the aging of population can lead to a secular increase of exits from the labor force, shrinking the labor force and decreasing the labor force participation rate.
We’re losing the largest generation of humans to have ever existed. They’re going to spend their money in retirement. They’ll demand goods and services but will participate in the work force that provides those services in ever shrinking numbers. Raising interest rates isn’t going to fix this inflationary problem.
We’re losing the largest generation of humans to have ever existed. They’re going to spend their money in retirement. They’ll demand goods and services but will participate in the work force that provides those services in ever shrinking numbers. Raising interest rates isn’t going to fix this inflationary problem.
#73
Here is the labor force participation rate. I will let everyone draw their own conclusions.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART
That graph also shows a gradual trend in the 60s and 70s of people entering the workforce (probably a lot of moms who previously stayed at home) because declining relative wages now required two breadwinners to support their family.
With the aging boomers - a large portion of working age adults - leaving the workforce, we should expect to see the drop in participation. They’re exiting the workforce and their numbers won’t return, as that “boom” hasn’t reoccurred and probably never will again.
#74
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Fedex
Posts: 160
Yes, pretty much at every major except here with the average of 183/yr over the next 10 years (166yr over next 5 years) based on age 65. That's the reality so don't shoot the messenger... No, we don't need age 67...
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 287
are you comparing total retirements as just a number or percentage of the pilot list? I’m just asking, don’t bite my head off.
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,099
Stay where you are and prepare for the coming storm. The more seniority numbers under you right now the better. Delta pilots will be in concession talks soon enough. All these 27 year old new hires at DL/UA/AA didn’t live in this industry through 9/11. Most weren’t here during the ‘08 meltdown.
#77
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2019
Posts: 44
So many guys at FDX were at AA and jumped to FDX in early 2000's. Ended up being a great choice. I honestly think if you have been here a year or so going to DL would work out great. But to each their own.
#78
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Fedex
Posts: 160
An additional 998 FDX pilots will turn 65 between 2028 and end 2032 (211/201/178/201/207).
This does not account for the people going early or out on medical naturally. If I'm not mistaken, the average retirement age at FDX is 64+. The FDX retirement #s are tiny compared to those at the 3 majors. If age 67 is implemented the picture understandably gets bleaker.
If the FDX DRIVE initiative ends up shrinking the airline to 5000-5500 via outsourcing as they are publicly pushing, we would be looking at roughly 4 years without hiring with just attrition bringing us down to that number. Not exactly a bright future for progression. Do I think this will happen? I have no idea, but the math does not lie if they really push DRIVE and decide to shrink the airline. Looking at a ramp full of FDX 737s in Europe or 747s here, makes one go hmmmm.....
Due to our nonexistent SCOPE, there is simply nothing we can do but watch it happen.
Last edited by pwdrhound; 03-29-2023 at 02:39 PM.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 287
According to the ALPA FDC MEC website, 833 FDX pilots will turn 65 by the end of 2027 (114/164/162/206/187).
An additional 998 FDX pilots will turn 65 between 2028 and end 2032 (211/201/178/201/207).
This does not account for the people going early or out on medical naturally. If I'm not mistaken, the average retirement age at FDX is 64+. The FDX retirement #s are tiny compared to those at the 3 majors. If age 67 is implemented the picture understandably gets bleaker.
If the FDX DRIVE initiative ends up shrinking the airline to 5000-5500 via outsourcing as they are publicly pushing, we would be looking at roughly 4 years without hiring with just attrition bringing us down to that number. Not exactly a bright future for progression. Do I think this will happen? I have no idea, but the math does not lie if they really push DRIVE and decide to shrink the airline. Looking at a ramp full of FDX 737s in Europe or 747s here, makes one go hmmmm.....
Due to our nonexistent SCOPE, there is simply nothing we can do but watch it happen.
An additional 998 FDX pilots will turn 65 between 2028 and end 2032 (211/201/178/201/207).
This does not account for the people going early or out on medical naturally. If I'm not mistaken, the average retirement age at FDX is 64+. The FDX retirement #s are tiny compared to those at the 3 majors. If age 67 is implemented the picture understandably gets bleaker.
If the FDX DRIVE initiative ends up shrinking the airline to 5000-5500 via outsourcing as they are publicly pushing, we would be looking at roughly 4 years without hiring with just attrition bringing us down to that number. Not exactly a bright future for progression. Do I think this will happen? I have no idea, but the math does not lie if they really push DRIVE and decide to shrink the airline. Looking at a ramp full of FDX 737s in Europe or 747s here, makes one go hmmmm.....
Due to our nonexistent SCOPE, there is simply nothing we can do but watch it happen.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post