Search

Notices

Scope Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2023 | 03:12 AM
  #161  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by threeighteen
We should absolutely be furloughing those of us on the bottom part of the list. 4.a.2.c benefits the company. Allows them to pay almost all of us less and gives them flexibility.

Nobody asked for 4.a.2.b to be kept, or improved. It benefits the company, not us.
Keeping you employed through subsidy from the rest of the list benefits the company, not you?

Twisted logic.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 06:03 AM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Fetal in the hub
Default

I've said this repeatedly. This is a tactic. All the negative messaging is carefully crafted and disseminated (and repeated by the Negotiating committee chair SMH) with purpose. The American consumer is strong the mild recession that the Fed manufactured is already taking place. Volumes are down because they were at record levels. STOP Panicking the house isn't suddenly on fire. There are obvious efficiency improvements that should have been done ages ago but Fedex isn't suddenly on the verge of bankruptcy despite the messaging from the company AND the Negotiating Chairman.

The numbers for the economy this summer will be strong.

Stay focused and vote No! Do not believe PM when he eludes to whatever deal he gets will be the only deal WE will get.

Last edited by Shaman; 05-02-2023 at 06:16 AM.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 08:09 AM
  #163  
magic rat's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 917
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by HvypurplePylot
Have you seen the other bases? Everyone is down.
How many total 737s was ASL flying out of LGG and CDG compared to now all out of CDG? From what I've heard it just looks worse now because they are all on the CDG ramp now.
Rolled through CDG a couple days ago, daytime, I could count about 27-30 737s all sitting on our ramp.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 08:21 AM
  #164  
CloudSailor's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by magic rat
Rolled through CDG a couple days ago, daytime, I could count about 27-30 737s all sitting on our ramp.
Isn't ASL's order from Boeing about 20 months for them to get another 20 73's? Just about the time that all of our 757 'support' could evaporate.

I would like to hear our own NC debate UPS's NC on the merits of fighting for international scope language now, not in 6-8 years.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 08:45 AM
  #165  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 86
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman

The numbers for the economy this summer will be strong.
I always appreciate your rationality and logic. And generally, I agree with 90% of what you say. But I think there are still some pretty significant headwinds from a macroeconomic perspective. Just four months into the year, we’ve lost three banks with total assets of more than half a trillion($). Inflation is nearly three times greater than 2018-19 and has been for some 20 months. And the FED is still planning on another hike this next quarter.

I’m not trying to give quarter to the company, but I don’t think this environment is as short lived as you convey. Your optimism is refreshing. Hope I’m wrong.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 09:24 AM
  #166  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by magic rat
We are frogs in the pot, “Is it getting warm in here or is it me?”
Shhhhh...we can turn it up a few more degrees. Just a couple, and just this once. I feel the same way.......
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 10:36 AM
  #167  
Config 3
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman
Stay focused and vote No! Do not believe PM when he eludes to whatever deal he gets will be the only deal WE will get.
I was with you until this one. Stop trying to tell people which way to vote on a contract none of have even seen yet.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 10:39 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by Merle Haggard
Keeping you employed through subsidy from the rest of the list benefits the company, not you?

Twisted logic.
Benefitted a lot of pax carriers during Covid.

Furloughing is expensive and prevents you from spooling back up quickly. The ideal situation for management is some way to not furlough but pay your pilots less than min guarantee. That’s 4.a.2.b

Also, unique circumstances to these times: furloughing a pilot in this environment means you’re not likely to have them come back when you do a recall, and you’re going to struggle to hire other pilots too because who wants to go work for the incompetent idiots that don’t pay as well and also furloughed in the middle of a pilot shortage?

so yeah, considering all that, 4.a.2.b benefits the company a lot more than it benefits us right now.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 01:11 PM
  #169  
Merle Haggard's Avatar
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Shaman

Stay focused and vote No! Do not believe PM when he eludes to whatever deal he gets will be the only deal WE will get.
Originally Posted by ClncClarence
I was with you until this one. Stop trying to tell people which way to vote on a contract none of have even seen yet.
Do not take your voting advice from someone who can't differentiate between elude and allude.
Reply
Old 05-02-2023 | 01:53 PM
  #170  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Sitting down, I get up and walk around so it just depends
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy
Admittedly, I’m a novice when it comes to this subject. However, in light of recent events, I believe this is the headline issue of the forthcoming contract. I just wanted to hear everyone’s thoughts on what should be primary considerations when it comes to this subject. I have my focus areas which I will now list, but I would like others to highlight some blind spots for me if you could.

Here’s my top four scope items:

1. International Scope
  • All international flights conducted by FEDEX ALPA from represented crewmembers will continue to be flown by such crewmembers. The Company will
    continually pursue additional route authority on a good faith basis. As the Company secures additional international route authority, it will take all reasonable steps to assure that such routes are flown by FEDEX ALPA crewmembers in accordance with this Agreement within two (2) bid periods of the date the route authority was granted. If the Company’s use of a subcontractor exceeds the two (2) bid periods under circumstances cited in this paragraph, the Company will meet with the Association to discuss the reason(s) for the delay. In no event will the Company take more than twelve (12) months to transition the new flying to the IPA, unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. The Company will report all use of subcontractors pursuant to this Section to the Association.
  • The above is copy and pasted from the UPS SCOPE section. This is a non-negotiable item for me. If it’s not in there, it’s a line in the sand. I understand some may disagree, but I didn’t come to FedEx for a domestic only airline.
  • In addition to this scope, I would include an aircraft size restriction that all international flying that utilizes aircraft that have FedEx pay rates in our contract must utilize FedEx pilots.
  • I realize this may not be enforceable or may face legal challenges. I don’t care. Get it in there.
2. Crew Compliment
  • All FedEx flights must have a minimum of two FedEx pilots.
  • Delta has this. I want it.
3. Future Pilot Operations
  • If future Pilot operations should no longer require an RFO Pilot in the aircraft and they move that position to the ground, that ground pilot must be a FedEx seniority list Pilot.
4. Third Party Freight
  • All FedEx freight that is flown between cities that are served by FedEx trunk aircraft both international and domestic must be flown by FedEx pilots.
  • Example - The company cannot utilize United airlines direct from SFO-LHR.
  • The company may utilize third party aircraft between cities that do not warrant trunk aircraft on that route, but once payload averages exceed 75,000 pounds per week, FedEx aircraft must be utilized.
  • For domestic operations, no more than ten cans can be shipped third party from an origin city per week. Beyond this, a significant penalty will be levied.
I realize I’m throwing myself to the wolves, but things are clearly getting out of hand. The crew force I believe has little knowledge of the ramifications of scope. And we are heading in a bad way. Would love a critique on my opinions. Would also like to see what other thoughts are out there in regards to scope. Have at it.

whatever PM says, do the opposite. NC needs to fix the glaring issues w scope. Just like payrates-The landscape has changed over 2 years for scope as well. Do not let PM guilt trip us over folks retiring under an old cba…he is really talking about “don’t let me, PM, retire under an old cba”. NC works for us
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yamahas3
Major
27
02-12-2011 06:41 AM
Beagle Pilot
Major
76
05-06-2010 07:18 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Toccata
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 09:40 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
1
09-28-2005 05:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices