Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   FedEx (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/)
-   -   Let's Talk Fedex 757 Pay Rates... (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/fedex/145715-lets-talk-fedex-757-pay-rates.html)

JustInFacts 01-09-2024 11:57 AM


Originally Posted by plzdontfireme (Post 3748462)

UA removed their offsets I believe.

Nope, UAL still has an offset.

JustInFacts 01-09-2024 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by FXLAX (Post 3748509)
The fact that our WB rates were comporable to their bk rates makes my case stronger. FDX never went through bk so if anything our rates should be higher their theirs.

LTD, two of the three legacies have no caps either. Its become industry standard. Let me put it this way, if we got no offsets, we still wouldn't be industry leading. We'd be catching up. So sorry if I didn't mention that delta has offsets for workers comp or pbgc anuities or that they all other offsets are gone after 3 years. The point is that if you throw out pbs, I throw out a couple dozen items were we are not industry STANDARD. The pbs argment is dead.

Lastly, this isn't about trying not to let management know any secrets. This is about OUR mentality. The mentality that we can't have a good things. When people make the pbs argument it furthers that mentaility into other's minds and they start spreading it. We need unity, not pilots thinking we cant ask for more simple becuase we don't have pbs or some other item. If you don't beleive it, fine. Don't spread the mind virus to others that are fighting to get a better contract.

You were the one who said that our WB rates were banded to the majors highest rate. I showed that wasn't the case.

Which two, UAL has an offset as well.

Where did I say anything about PBS? You are confusing me with another poster.

This discussion is about 757 rates. I simply pointed out that saying our 757 rates should be tied to UAL, DAL, or AA because they are industry standard is a dangerous argument. For 17 years, our 757 has been tied to our NB rate. When we got the 777, the arbitrator agreed with the company that we have a NB and WB rate. Now, if we say we want industry standard rates, how do we keep our 767 and Airbus at WB rates. They aren't industry standard. They also comprise about 35% of our crewforce.

I have no problem trying to make things better. We just better make sure our arguments for one item don't hurt another item.

2BEER 01-09-2024 01:02 PM


Originally Posted by plzdontfireme (Post 3748580)
Outside of bankruptcy. I can't think of a single time the legacy carriers looked at our negotiated widebody rates and said "oh hey, let's negotiate a rate lower than FedEx, that will surely pass and won't drag the industry down with us"

meanwhile, 2000 fedex pilots voted to do exactly that.

This exactly!

plzdontfireme 01-09-2024 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by JustInFacts (Post 3748628)
Nope, UAL still has an offset.

Their AIP guide said that offsets were removed unless you accept another position at UAL. Is that not correct?

JustInFacts 01-10-2024 03:34 AM


Originally Posted by plzdontfireme (Post 3748580)
Outside of bankruptcy. I can't think of a single time the legacy carriers looked at our negotiated widebody rates and said "oh hey, let's negotiate a rate lower than FedEx, that will surely pass and won't drag the industry down with us"

meanwhile, 2000 fedex pilots voted to do exactly that.


Originally Posted by 2BEER (Post 3748643)
This exactly!

Well, I don't know what they said, but in June 2012, DALPA signed a contract with their top WB for 2012 at $235 per hour. Our rate in March of 2012 was $261 per hour. So, they took a rate that was about $26 per hour less than ours. In December of 2012, UAL did the same thing.


Originally Posted by plzdontfireme (Post 3748648)
Their AIP guide said that offsets were removed unless you accept another position at UAL. Is that not correct?

I don't know what their guide said, but 24.H.4 of their contract says they still have an offset.

TransWorld 01-10-2024 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by EMBFlyer (Post 3748623)
The American furlough was ABSOLUTELY a furlough. I was there. They sent pilots to the street. It was real and it hppened.

Not to minimize it. But how long were you Furloughed?

EMBFlyer 01-10-2024 09:00 AM


Originally Posted by TransWorld (Post 3749008)
Not to minimize it. But how long were you Furloughed?

I personally wasn't. I left AA on my own accord, but I was I done with the place.

I know the actual furlough was very short, but it was technically a furlough, none the less. That was painfully evident when it came time to train the recalled pilots back up and the length of time it took to requal them.

Whether I was personally furloughed or not is irrelevant. I was just correcting a small amount of the piles and piles misinformation that plagues this site (and others).

Viper25 01-10-2024 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by EMBFlyer (Post 3749012)
I personally wasn't. I left AA on my own accord, but I was I done with the place.

I know the actual furlough was very short, but it was technically a furlough, none the less. That was painfully evident when it came time to train the recalled pilots back up and the length of time it took to requal them.

Whether I was personally furloughed or not is irrelevant. I was just correcting a small amount of the piles and piles misinformation that plagues this site (and others).

I specifically said that AA furloughed and then unfurloughed very shortly later. With back pay. I don’t intend nor desire to minimize how terrible the experience was. That said, Delta also had the exact same nightmare with recalling and training their pilots that they benched too, despite not officially furloughing. The training snafu doesn’t add any weight to whether or not a furlough occurred. It’s just a reflection of managements’ bad decisions.

FXLAX 01-10-2024 02:59 PM


Originally Posted by JustInFacts (Post 3748632)
You were the one who said that our WB rates were banded to the majors highest rate. I showed that wasn't the case.

Which two, UAL has an offset as well.

Where did I say anything about PBS? You are confusing me with another poster.

This discussion is about 757 rates. I simply pointed out that saying our 757 rates should be tied to UAL, DAL, or AA because they are industry standard is a dangerous argument. For 17 years, our 757 has been tied to our NB rate. When we got the 777, the arbitrator agreed with the company that we have a NB and WB rate. Now, if we say we want industry standard rates, how do we keep our 767 and Airbus at WB rates. They aren't industry standard. They also comprise about 35% of our crewforce.

I have no problem trying to make things better. We just better make sure our arguments for one item don't hurt another item.

Our WB rates were comporable to other's top pay aircraft. That's what I said only becuase I saw the pay rate comparison tables from contract TAs from the 2000s.

Yes, UAL has offsets. I wasn't including pbgc offsets (that only affect those who have a pension and are on ltd) and offsets that expire after 3 years. And they did get rid of the other offsets. Nonetheless, that is still more closer to standard than ours. So it doesn't hurt the case I was making.

As for getting you confused, maybe. I was replying to max who throws out the pbs argment. Then you came into the conversation. Not tryint to put words in your mouth.

Ok, the 757. I agree with you there...up to the point that the UAL TA was ratified. Now industry standard is that the 757 is pay banded with the 767-300. This is not a disengenous argument unless you think you can make the arugment that since the 757 paid $120/hour (or whatever it was) 17 years ago that we cannot say it needs to be hiegh now along with other's contractual gains on the 757.

Peronally, I'd like to see a single blended rate with credit for training savings.

Laughing_Jakal 01-10-2024 05:06 PM

Are you a 757 guy?

Simple solution for getting higher rates for the 757 is to go to 767.........you don't have to change the industry, the company, or the contract....just your relative seniority.

You need to fight for what's right in your mind as you see it, but sometimes Don Quixote would have been better off taking the easier path....

I also need to take my own advice as I have often times tried to cultivate martyrdom as my profession.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands