Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > FedEx
Comedy-hour continues… >

Comedy-hour continues…

Search
Notices

Comedy-hour continues…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2024, 09:59 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by Cowpoke View Post
Rock,

You just don’t understand leverage. After a few more recalls and we get the right people in place you’ll understand. They will use leverage. It’s going to be awesome.
+1. It's the new way of governance they are embracing. F consensus building, that is hard. Just purge everyone who doesn't agree with you. And then ignore all advice and run headfirst into the brick wall.
HelpABrotherOut is offline  
Old 03-21-2024, 10:00 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 170
Default

Originally Posted by HelpABrotherOut View Post
+1. It's the new way of governance they are embracing. F consensus building, that is hard. Just purge everyone who doesn't agree with you. And then ignore all advice and run headfirst into the brick wall.
That's a great description of the situation leading up to the failed TA 2023.
plzdontfireme is offline  
Old 03-21-2024, 10:00 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 261
Default

Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318 View Post
Despite the teeth-gnashing and numerous references to the Tony Ticker, the average FedEx pilot has lost exactly $0.00 from TA1.0 failing. Any pay and retirement gains we could have gotten were voided once a majority found it lacking, and voted no. We'll eventually get TA 2, and that TA will have an APRP attached to it. The APRP will be calculated back to the CBA amenable date, not to any date attached to the failed TA1. Then it'll be up to us to decide if that's sufficient for a yes vote, and at that time you can make a semi-valid calculation of "money lost".

Plenty of his other points have varying degrees of validity to them, but deserve little in the way of time spent refuting individual points. He's angry and bitter that we unwashed, drooling masses did not see TA 1.0 as worthy of a yes vote.
This ^^^^

Meh… The poster hijacked the ALPA campaign process for serious MEC Chair candidates. His campaign letter will do more harm for his cause that TA1 was salvageable. It’s gone and he chose a poor method to deal with his grief (emotions) over it.
Yuko is offline  
Old 03-21-2024, 10:03 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by plzdontfireme View Post
That's a great description of the situation leading up to the failed TA 2023.
How so? Please enlighten me.
HelpABrotherOut is offline  
Old 03-21-2024, 10:34 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 170
Default

Originally Posted by HelpABrotherOut View Post
How so? Please enlighten me.
"F consensus building" = "worrying about your job security when the pension bump of a few hundred is on the line is unconscionable"

"purge everyone who doesn't agree with you" = push a ****ty TA through fast so that over 700 pilots, more than 10% of the pilot group, of which 8 out of 10 will vote no, can't vote on it.

"ignore all advice and run headfirst into the brick wall." = exactly what they did despite the pilot group pushing the MEC to not send us a ****ty concessionary TA. They ignored all advice, ran into a brick wall and sent it to us anyway. Then we told them to cancel the vote once we saw how horrible it was, they ignored all advice, ran into a brick wall and kept the vote on anyway. Then we voted no and told them to step down, they ignored all advice and ran into a brick wall and wasted time for us and didn't resign. Then we recalled them, and then they continued to ignore all advice and kept trying to ram us into a brick wall with TA 1.1 and delaying the seating of some of their replacements.

The fact of the matter is that your leaders that you love were not only wrong but also completely inept, and your continued loyalty to them is only damaging your chances of ever seeing a TA before your retirement date comes along.
plzdontfireme is offline  
Old 03-21-2024, 10:54 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by Cowpoke View Post
Rock,

You just don’t understand leverage. After a few more recalls and we get the right people in place you’ll understand. They will use leverage. It’s going to be awesome.
LOL. Can we put the guy who believes the world is flat into the MEC Chair. That will really impress the company and the NMB.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-21-2024, 11:01 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Default

Originally Posted by plzdontfireme View Post
"The fact of the matter is that your leaders that you love were not only wrong but also completely inept, and your continued loyalty to them is only damaging your chances of ever seeing a TA before your retirement date comes along.
I don't have to retire until 2032, but based on the three ring circus our union has turned into, I'm starting to wonder if I'll see a new TA before then. On the bright side, my lanyard collection will be awesome.
Rock is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 06:21 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
3pointlanding's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 307
Default

Originally Posted by Shadow Recruit View Post
Make sure to swallow the coffee you just drank before reading. I am not responsible for any damage done to devices that is a result of your reaction to this hilarious MEC Chair campaign add. Though you can certainly reach out to its author and demand reparations from him, he’s clearly swimming in cash since TA 1.0 was good enough for him.
You obviously did not see the Brownlee or Raj messages
3pointlanding is offline  
Old 03-22-2024, 11:16 AM
  #19  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
I don't have to retire until 2032, but based on the three ring circus our union has turned into, I'm starting to wonder if I'll see a new TA before then. On the bright side, my lanyard collection will be awesome.
It very well may take a while to get to TA 2. But I'll take that vs. continuing to expect something to change after 30+months of negotiating, a terrible TA (unless you were retiring within 6 months), and continuing tone-deaf leadership with the same people at the table in the NC/MEC. I agree it'd be nice to have more definition and confidence in our new overlords plan, but that concerns me less than the TA1.1 we were bound to eventually get Dec 23 Feb 24 May 24 who knows?
FedUpWilson318 is offline  
Old 03-23-2024, 12:53 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Position: Wichita
Posts: 684
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
I don't have to retire until 2032, but based on the three ring circus our union has turned into, I'm starting to wonder if I'll see a new TA before then. On the bright side, my lanyard collection will be awesome.
Stop being so dramatic. You’re not funny.
JackStraw is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
DLax85
Cargo
99
12-16-2015 05:06 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
2
06-15-2012 07:14 AM
Razorback flyer
Major
17
06-13-2012 08:13 PM
Gordon C
Pilot Health
14
01-29-2007 05:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices