Search
Notices
Flight Schools and Training Ratings, building hours, airmanship, CFI topics

737 type schools

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2013, 08:14 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atr42flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: A300, FO
Posts: 311
Default

I went through PanAm in vegas, total cost including hotel was just about $6k plus food and gambling money.
atr42flyer is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 02:24 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Jet Pilot
Posts: 797
Default

Originally Posted by Apokleros View Post
Would anyone care to explain why SW still follows this backwards policy of making its workers pay for the responsibility of training which it should rightfully undertake itself?
Sure. First, they do it because they can. There is no shortage of people willing to pay for their own type rating. Second, SWA requires a 737 type rating - i.e., SWA does not explicitly require you to pay for anything. If you do not already have one then YOU make the choice to pay for it yourself.

Personally, I call this forward thinking and not "backwards" on the part of the company. Any airline does not exist solely to provide jobs for people - they exist to be profitable.
Lab Rat is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 02:32 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Jet Pilot
Posts: 797
Default

Originally Posted by Apokleros View Post
But how will applicants know that they'll get a call? If they don't, then they're left ten thousand $ in the hole.

Furthermore, what good is a type-rating without time in said type?

I don't mean to be a pain in the rear by asking so many questions; I'm only genuinely curious, that's all. I would tend to think that a successful airline like SW would be able to afford to train their new-hires like most airlines do.
But how will applicants know that they'll get a call? If they don't, then they're left ten thousand $ in the hole.
They do not know. You are correct in saying that one could spend thousands of dollars on a type rating only to never have it pay off in their favor. This is why one must do the pro vs con analysis when contemplating who to work for. Personally, while I really respect SWA and think they are a great company, I refused to pay for my own type rating in the "hopes" of ever getting a call from them. I just did not want to work for them that bad.

Furthermore, what good is a type-rating without time in said type?
It isn't.

I would tend to think that a successful airline like SW would be able to afford to train their new-hires like most airlines do.
I'm a capitalist through and through and a firm believer in free-market economics. The ONLY reason SWA can do this is because the market allows for it - i.e., there is more than an adequate supply of people attaining 737 type ratings (either paying for it themselves or earning one at a different carrier). While I would not pay for my own type rating, at the same time I cannot fault SWA management for requiring a 737 type rating.
Lab Rat is offline  
Old 09-13-2013, 05:03 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawker Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: Toilet warmer.
Posts: 337
Default

Does anyone know someone who waited until they got the job offer before getting the type?

I know several guys who got it beforehand who didn't get an offer......
Hawker Driver is offline  
Old 09-14-2013, 05:40 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 110
Default

Seems to me the requirement of a 737 type would need to be validated with current employees. Can they still do that being that now the AirTran guys can't all be typed in the 737? Am I Right?
Kaptain is offline  
Old 09-14-2013, 06:48 PM
  #16  
On Reserve
 
EvertsDC9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: DC-9
Posts: 15
Default

Really, a 737 type...why? If I'm paying for it, I'd rather get typed in the Concord. What's the sudden fascination with the 737? I think it's an ugly airplane...IMHO
EvertsDC9 is offline  
Old 09-14-2013, 07:15 PM
  #17  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
Default

No such thing as a ugly airplane
Biscuit is offline  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:08 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 949
Default

Originally Posted by Hawker Driver View Post
Does anyone know someone who waited until they got the job offer before getting the type?
I know of one guy...had come off the MD-80 at another company, interviewed, got the offer, and I think it was six months to get the 737 type. He did it a couple weeks later, called SWA, and got a class date.
DirectTo is offline  
Old 09-14-2013, 10:48 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by EvertsDC9 View Post
Really, a 737 type...why? If I'm paying for it, I'd rather get typed in the Concord. What's the sudden fascination with the 737? I think it's an ugly airplane...IMHO
I'd rather be typed in a 737 than a DC9. I think it would be much easier to find a job.
HappyCrew is offline  
Old 09-14-2013, 11:43 PM
  #20  
Old P-3 IFE
 
OrionFE's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: B744 FO
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by dudemize View Post
Hard to go wrong with HPA but it's not cheap! It will probably set you back 12k+ after hotel/food/booze (assuming you don't live in Dallas).

Higher Power Aviation, leading aviation training provider | Higher Power Aviation
I did the HP B737NG and it was $10K (VA paid). The classic I think runs about $7K. I stayed at a friends place, so I made out there. I would highly recommend HP. Great atmosphere and good instructors!
OrionFE is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MetalGear
Technical
8
01-24-2013 08:08 PM
themagicman00
Flight Schools and Training
32
08-09-2012 09:04 PM
Rad1
Flight Schools and Training
4
01-30-2012 06:02 AM
BoilerWings
Corporate
24
10-23-2009 04:18 PM
SkyHigh
GoJet
179
02-09-2009 07:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices