Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Frontier Negotiations Discussion >

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Search

Notices

Frontier Negotiations Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2018 | 09:36 AM
  #2951  
Mugatu's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 517
Likes: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Planepirate
I agree with your last sentence. But F9’s is not more profitable than any of the legacies or WN.
Higher profit margin I’m guessing he meant to say, which happens to be more important than profitability.
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 10:46 AM
  #2952  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by FLYMIA
Sorry if i'm not quite understanding this. Are you saying, because the company will not be able to lower first year pay in the future it is the reason year 1 will be lower from the original ask of 70? Or is it a combination of that and lowering the ask from first year pay to apply in other areas of the contract?
No. Not quite sure what your asking with question 2 but I’ll try and explain another way. We know that the company will have to raise first year pay from the proposed 39 first year to attract new hires at some point in the near future. When they do that it can never be lowered and can’t go above year 2 (that’s what I believe the contractual language will be but don’t know for sure?) The reason that was done was to lower the overall cost of the entire proposal and shift that saving to other areas. We should know what it’s going to be in a few days. We will know for sure what the language is and no idea if the company will publish a different number at that point. Right now classes are filling so it might not come off the 39 immediately. IMO.
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 11:26 AM
  #2953  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,894
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by Mugatu
Higher profit margin I’m guessing he meant to say, which happens to be more important than profitability.
Your last two quarterly reports paint a dramatically different picture.
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 11:30 AM
  #2954  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by OpenClimb
I’m betting the details posted so far are pretty accurate.

It’ll take the Union an entire week to assemble the necessary propaganda to launch a full scale sales job.

As they ram this down our throats, please keep in mind how offended you were when you saw the details posted by Mr. Dimpledballs.

Please prepare your rationalization as to why we should be paid LESS than other domestic narrowbody operators. Please consider that the company we work for is MORE profitable than any of the legacies and WN.

Please don’t be impatient and vote in the first offer because you’re scared or because you’d like 30 cents on the dollar in a signing bonus because you’d like to buy a new car or whatever.
The details are NOT accurate. Let’s not all get hysterical like a bad Greek tragedy. Breath in, breath out, repeat.
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 12:21 PM
  #2955  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mugatu
Higher profit margin I’m guessing he meant to say, which happens to be more important than profitability.
So if you owned a business: it would be more important to you to sell 100 items at a 30% markup? Or sell 1,000,000 of the same item at a 10% markup?
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 12:33 PM
  #2956  
Big E 757's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 12
From: A320 Left seat
Default

Speaking of trying to attract new hires, for the past week when I come to this site, all three pop up adds are for Frontier Airlines. “Right career, right lifestyle”. It just started a week ago, or so but they’ve got all three add spots every time I refresh the page. I wonder how much that costs....

Anyway, I hope the new AIP/TA meets your criteria. Don’t forget that they’ve spent years wearing your group down. Don’t vote yes because you’re fatigued from fighting to keep the operation going. And don’t vote yes because the union says this is the best we can do. The details you see in the AIP will be the least amount that management thinks is required to get a 50.1% vote in favor.

Don’t be afraid to send it back. I’m afraid, though, that there are enough pilots that will see the money and do some math and vote yes because it WILL be a substantial raise and bonus. Good luck guys. Hopefully it will be an easy decision but I doubt it will.
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 12:45 PM
  #2957  
Stirring the pot
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 67
From: Off reserve 🤫
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Your last two quarterly reports paint a dramatically different picture.

Um private equity firms “publish” what they want to....
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 12:49 PM
  #2958  
Stirring the pot
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 67
From: Off reserve 🤫
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
“snip” I’m afraid, though, that there are enough pilots that will see the money and do some math and vote yes because it WILL be a substantial raise and bonus. “Snip”
This^^^^^^^^ is what will happen
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 12:52 PM
  #2959  
Prettywhacked1's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Can only hope that the group looks forwards and can overcome the self serving DEN crowd......it’s that simple...........
Reply
Old 11-07-2018 | 12:55 PM
  #2960  
LakeshoreFlyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: A320/CA
Default

Originally Posted by Planepirate
I agree with your last sentence. But F9’s is not more profitable than any of the legacies or WN.
Originally Posted by Planepirate
I agree with your last sentence. But F9’s is not more profitable than any of the legacies or WN.
Hi Planepirate, can you explain what you mean with the above quote?

My understanding of profitability, in a very broad sense, is the money from revenue you have left over after expenses are paid. And I would think that net profit margin is whatever is left after costs are subtracted from revenue. In the airlines we use revenue per available seat mile minus costs per available seat mile, or RASM minus CASM equals moolah (dollahs!!!).

If Frontier has a RASM of 10 (10 cents revenue per available seat mile) and their CASM is 5, that equates to a spread (or profitability) of 5. If Delta's RASM is 15, and their CASM is 10, that equates to a spread of 5. That would make them equally profitable, right? And I think these are roughly accurate numbers. But, the numbers aren't my question so much as to what my thought process is.

I don't think economies of scale apply to this discussion because the higher the scale, the higher the distribution. Meaning, you may take in more money, but you have to spread it across more people.

This is why I think Frontier pilots SHOULD be paid on par with legacy pilots as I believe Frontier is among the most profitable airlines in the Country. I'm aware the Alaska arbiter disagrees and that's why I am for throwing the NMB out of negotiations and letting market forces dictate the pressure. Frontier pilots have leverage that the NMB wants to take away from them by telling the Frontier negotiators that their peers are ULCC's. Ones peers should be judged by the relative worth they contribute to the Company's profitability. In my oh so humble opinion, of course.

This is a broader question not just to Planepirate, but anybody else want to chime in on this thinking???
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
319wisperer
Frontier
9485
06-20-2019 11:31 AM
JohnHale
United
65
09-19-2013 12:21 PM
Ravensvic
Frontier
71
10-18-2012 06:56 PM
alfaromeo
Major
68
06-29-2012 04:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices