Search

Notices

News thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2026 | 06:56 PM
  #931  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 63
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
Maintaining individual carrier identity and contracts are fine w/ me. But, we already pretty much have a consensus on aircraft type pay and there really are only 4 airlines (with most if not all of the rest headed toward consolidation). So, it really wouldn't be that hard nor bad timing to implement.

Step 1. Every CA at an ALPA carrier (and rumor has it AA is making the switch) is assigned a GLOBAL seniority #. ALPA 00001 pilot goes to whomever was hired first (tie goes to the older person) and so on. This seniority # is ONLY granted to existing CAs or after upgrade sim check.
Step 2. Upon next CBA negotiation, each ALPA carrier contract would require a clause/paragraph w/in the scope section that allows (not requires) for each carrier to hire/acquire pilots not currently w/ the company but currently on the ALPA seniority list and utilize them as CAs. That clause would need provisions that would ensure existing FOs continue to upgrade at a "predetermined" rate.

This would "normalize" our industry to other domestic non-aviation as well as forein aviation industries. It would incentivize FOs to upgrade at 1st opportunity. But most importantly, it would preserve/utilize the CA skillset to its fullest in the case of airline merger or failure.

The only downside is the implementation of it for the EXISTING FOs at ALPA carriers. That's a lot of pilots and while it wouldn't PREVENT them from upgrading, it could potentially delay it.
The only downside is to roughly half of voting members. Lol. Yeah good luck. The next bottom 25% captains are a no as well. How are downgrades, displacements, furloughs handled? Some contracts have bump and flush some don’t ect..


Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 02-01-2026 at 07:22 PM.
Reply
Old 02-02-2026 | 07:13 AM
  #932  
Shrek's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
25M+ Airline Miles
15 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 119
Default

Bwahahahaha - will never happen……
Reply
Old 02-02-2026 | 07:42 AM
  #933  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 794
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek
Bwahahahaha - will never happen……
Exactly. What a useless debate.
Reply
Old 02-02-2026 | 09:48 AM
  #934  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 178
Likes: 32
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
Maintaining individual carrier identity and contracts are fine w/ me. But, we already pretty much have a consensus on aircraft type pay and there really are only 4 airlines (with most if not all of the rest headed toward consolidation). So, it really wouldn't be that hard nor bad timing to implement.

Step 1. Every CA at an ALPA carrier (and rumor has it AA is making the switch) is assigned a GLOBAL seniority #. ALPA 00001 pilot goes to whomever was hired first (tie goes to the older person) and so on. This seniority # is ONLY granted to existing CAs or after upgrade sim check.
Step 2. Upon next CBA negotiation, each ALPA carrier contract would require a clause/paragraph w/in the scope section that allows (not requires) for each carrier to hire/acquire pilots not currently w/ the company but currently on the ALPA seniority list and utilize them as CAs. That clause would need provisions that would ensure existing FOs continue to upgrade at a "predetermined" rate.

This would "normalize" our industry to other domestic non-aviation as well as forein aviation industries. It would incentivize FOs to upgrade at 1st opportunity. But most importantly, it would preserve/utilize the CA skillset to its fullest in the case of airline merger or failure.

The only downside is the implementation of it for the EXISTING FOs at ALPA carriers. That's a lot of pilots and while it wouldn't PREVENT them from upgrading, it could potentially delay it.

I am not on board with the once a Captain always a Captain Idea. To me Captain that conveys mastery of the aircraft (type Specific) and as such just because you were flying a 787 does not mean you should be able to go straight to Captain on a A220 If you don't have time on that aircraft. Granted any time there is a new airplane type some one has to be the first to fly it. This is where the 787 pilot would shine. Not because he flew a 787 ,but because of the sheer number of aircraft type ratings he has just getting to the 787 shows a level of competence, dedication ,and experience that lines up with the "putting your best foot forward principal". If that guy wants to fly a common type he has never flown. He should start as an FO because it in impossible to truly master an Aircraft you have 0 hours in.
Reply
Old 02-02-2026 | 10:10 AM
  #935  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 178
Likes: 32
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
Maintaining individual carrier identity and contracts are fine w/ me. But, we already pretty much have a consensus on aircraft type pay and there really are only 4 airlines (with most if not all of the rest headed toward consolidation). So, it really wouldn't be that hard nor bad timing to implement.

Step 1. Every CA at an ALPA carrier (and rumor has it AA is making the switch) is assigned a GLOBAL seniority #. ALPA 00001 pilot goes to whomever was hired first (tie goes to the older person) and so on. This seniority # is ONLY granted to existing CAs or after upgrade sim check.
Step 2. Upon next CBA negotiation, each ALPA carrier contract would require a clause/paragraph w/in the scope section that allows (not requires) for each carrier to hire/acquire pilots not currently w/ the company but currently on the ALPA seniority list and utilize them as CAs. That clause would need provisions that would ensure existing FOs continue to upgrade at a "predetermined" rate.

This would "normalize" our industry to other domestic non-aviation as well as forein aviation industries. It would incentivize FOs to upgrade at 1st opportunity. But most importantly, it would preserve/utilize the CA skillset to its fullest in the case of airline merger or failure.

The only downside is the implementation of it for the EXISTING FOs at ALPA carriers. That's a lot of pilots and while it wouldn't PREVENT them from upgrading, it could potentially delay it.
It could work the way you think, or it could work completely differently. A lot of horse trading needs to happen to iron out those details. I do like the Idea that your thinking about it. None of this is written in stone (or even on paper far as I know) at this point The main advantage being better use of our Union Dues, More power at the bargaining table. and uniform pay, bennies & work rules.
Reply
Old 02-02-2026 | 10:34 PM
  #936  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,167
Likes: 803
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Shrek
Bwahahahaha - will never happen……
Originally Posted by DumboDrop
Exactly. What a useless debate.
This. Not happening.
Reply
Old 02-03-2026 | 06:33 AM
  #937  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 119
From: Joystick Operator
Default

Between AL commenting about changes "some might not be happy with" in RGS and our marketing putting this out ( https://frontiermiles.com/ ) , anyone wanna take a guess?
Reply
Old 02-03-2026 | 06:38 AM
  #938  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 165
Likes: 3
Default

SJU is closing, probably CVG and MIA. Possibly one west coast. We shouldn’t have had this may bases to begin with. Finally seniority will mean something.
Reply
Old 02-03-2026 | 06:39 AM
  #939  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 794
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
Between AL commenting about changes "some might not be happy with" in RGS and our marketing putting this out ( https://frontiermiles.com/ ) , anyone wanna take a guess?
He also said "some will like it."

A better loyalty program and a focus on not ****ing people off so they come back. Hope it works.
Reply
Old 02-03-2026 | 06:53 AM
  #940  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 248
Likes: 170
Default

Originally Posted by spooldup
Between AL commenting about changes "some might not be happy with" in RGS and our marketing putting this out ( https://frontiermiles.com/ ) , anyone wanna take a guess?
New once a week service to Iceland, 15 A330Ns, 1st class seating and Wifi.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kuma66
Air Wisconsin
3
04-21-2019 03:11 AM
Planetrain
Delta
90
10-27-2018 08:45 PM
iahflyr
SkyWest
1273
08-27-2017 03:46 AM
Bocaflyer
Fractional
26
06-26-2007 09:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices