![]() |
Originally Posted by Stayontarget
(Post 3684785)
Engine issues have 0% affect on us. Sometimes the god of revenue shines on a carrier.
edit: the previous engine issues involving P&W. Airbus delays are another story…. I will try and find the article. |
Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590
(Post 3684815)
You're thinking of Spirit.
|
Originally Posted by 6packSteamJedi
(Post 3684842)
Thanks, I have a hard time keeping some of this stuff straight.
Everyone needs to understand what and why they did what they did. After the agreement to merge with JetBlue, and in an attempt to try and slow down attrition, Spirit and Management agreed to a quick little pay raise contract. It was really just an extension of their old contract with higher pay rates. It's a short term deal until a joint contract can be negotiated between B6/NK. If the merger is not approved by the DOJ, Spirit will immediately return to negotiate a new, full contract. Spirit agreed to a short term deal with very mediocre pay raises but with the promise of a future contract in the new future. (either a joint one with JetBlue or a full, new one if they stay independent) The problem for us is that Frontier will definitely look at those pay rates and say "that's your 'peer group' Everyone needs to be crystal clear that we can't look at those rates ($306/ hr for 12th year ca) as a comparison. The circumstances of their deal cannot be confused with what we are working towards. Obviously our union understands this but don't be surprised if we see a video from BL talking about Spirit and peer groups. Btw, Spirit has admitted that the contract (pay raises they gave) hasn't done much or anything to stem attrition. If Frontier wants to seriously show down the attrition, they will need to pay a market rate for pilots. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3684880)
If Frontier wants to seriously show down the attrition, they will need to pay a market rate for pilots.
|
Originally Posted by planejoe
(Post 3684909)
Very clear they are not serious as they asked for concessions on day 1 of negotiations.
|
The fact that there are some people here who honestly think that this will be a quick negotiation is completely laughable.
|
Originally Posted by turbojet28
(Post 3684999)
The fact that there are some people here who honestly think that this will be a quick negotiation is completely laughable.
|
Originally Posted by Powderkeg
(Post 3684974)
A concession implies giving something up without gaining anything else. Assuming you’re talking about swap/drop etc, they didn’t ask for a concession. They asked to bring us in line with the rest of the industry. Which is also what we are asking for in regards to pay and benefits. We can either accept industry standard pay and industry standard scheduling flexibility (or lack thereof) or accept less somewhere else to keep our flexibility. I’m not being a company sympathizer or Debbie-Downer but this is how a mediator is going to look at it.
|
Originally Posted by CantStayAway
(Post 3685183)
Valid points. For what it’s worth, IF I had to choose, I’d keep the flexibility. There are so many people here who have never flown 121 before that I’m nervous we may end up going to an industry standard reserve-based drop/swap (aka: DENIED). I’d personally prefer to keep our flexibility even if it came with a lower hourly rate. I don’t believe that it is as much of an issue as they make it out to be though. Until lately (due to all of the premium flying) when a pilot dropped a trip into open time it was sucked up within 30 seconds (yes literally).
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the flexibility. But you can't put that in APC under the pay rates column. NO ONE IS COMING HERE for the flexibility. In fact, guys who have it are leaving. We need the RATES. We need to get paid - even if we have to give up some of the QoL items - just to be competitive w/ other airlines. Otherwise, we stagnate. And that wonderful flexibility is lessened by the fact that there are no upgrades, there's no open time and PAF is a desperate measure in the 11th hour that requires guys to be online 24/7 just to get it. Rates are king in this world. TBH, there really should be no reason why we can't have the rates AND the flexibility. Imagine a AA pilot leaving for F9... A competent CEO could manage this. Hell, he'd be PROUD to. |
Originally Posted by dracir1
(Post 3685494)
No no no!!!
Don't get me wrong, I LOVE the flexibility. But you can't put that in APC under the pay rates column. NO ONE IS COMING HERE for the flexibility. In fact, guys who have it are leaving. We need the RATES. We need to get paid - even if we have to give up some of the QoL items - just to be competitive w/ other airlines. Otherwise, we stagnate. And that wonderful flexibility is lessened by the fact that there are no upgrades, there's no open time and PAF is a desperate measure in the 11th hour that requires guys to be online 24/7 just to get it. Rates are king in this world. TBH, there really should be no reason why we can't have the rates AND the flexibility. Imagine a AA pilot leaving for F9... A competent CEO could manage this. Hell, he'd be PROUD to. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands