Search
Notices

Frontier Hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2017, 08:48 AM
  #7461  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 550
Default

Originally Posted by motorboatin View Post
The contract addresses first year pay, doesn't it? Of course thy care about new guys!! Shortsighted and not a fair post PB.
I'm not [no profanity please] about the pay, that we all knew coming in the door. Nor am I upset with our union in any way. I think they are doing a good job so far.

First year sucks, period. I'm just venting.
PulledBreaker is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 09:30 AM
  #7462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sab1250's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Airbus CA
Posts: 187
Default

P.B.,
If you know this to be fact, that they aren't addressing the no hotels for new hires during training, then I stand corrected. Your post sounded like an assumption, and I reacted to that. Many people post unsubstantiated options on here, without bothering to even try to look up the facts, and it irks me. I will have to look into this. I will read the TA (whenever we get one), in its entirety in order to assess how close we are to something aggreable, but there are many issues that will garner an instant no vote from me. Not adequately addressing first year compensation is one of them. If we aren't asking for paid hotels during new hire training, then first year pay needs to be at least equal to Delta's. $70/hr won't cut it! $70/hr is already below industry standard, but no hotel during new hire training on top of that isn't even in the same ballpark!
sab1250 is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 10:06 AM
  #7463  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Windsor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Zee Airboos
Posts: 404
Default

I'm on first year pay. I have a family of 5. I knew full well what I was getting into financially. Do my sub $1000 checks suck? Absolutely. But I'm not complaining about it, because it is what it is. I was asked multiple times by multiple people if I knew and understand how low 1st year pay is. The interviewers, the runners, JP, Stephanie, the whole interview gang had mentioned it at one point or another. There was zero hiding that fact.
I am not disappointed in F9 in the least bit. It was exactly what I expected. I had low expectations for the pay and high expectations for the pilot group. That's what I've gotten so far.
The low pay will be fixed in the new contract. It absolutely has to in order for F9 to survive in the future. The well of applicants is running dry. $$ will be the only way to fix it. Any pilot with half a brain should realize that if they are not hired in 2017, upgrade will simply not happen at F9. If you are going to be a career FO, the pay rates and work rules had better be outstanding. If not, good luck filling those seats in this hiring boom.
For those new hires that are disappointed, chillax. It'll get better. It always does.
Windsor is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 11:00 AM
  #7464  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 81
Default

Originally Posted by Windsor View Post
Any pilot with half a brain should realize that if they are not hired in 2017, upgrade will simply not happen at F9. .
Why do you say that? Is it just based on the projected new aircraft deliveries? What's to say, they don't order more new aircraft in the coming years? The ULCC market still may have room to grow. There aren't many US carriers doing international flying in the ULCC model. This is one way the company could continue to grow. I'm not saying it will happen, but I don't know if I would say you'd never upgrade at F9 if you don't get hired in 2017...
xjtr is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 11:06 AM
  #7465  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Default

Originally Posted by AirBUZ View Post
I feel very disappointed with F9, i actually started working here with a good attitude and high hopes, unfortunately i have acquired lots of debt just by coming to this place. I still have 2 more months to go on first year pay and honestly it has brought me great trouble in my life. Morals in the flight deck are low, and its the first time in my short career that i am not enjoying what i am doing. I am posting this for all the guys and girls who read this forum, it has been said before but really THINK ABOUT THIS DECISION! unfortunately i have car payments, student loans, rent, crash pad, bills and a baby on the way and it is literally impossible to do it on 2200 dollars a month. I will have to take advantage of my a320 type rating and seek opportunitues overseas where im sure things wont be great, but at least my family and i wont have to live on a 100 dollar a month food budget. Feeling dissapointed at F9 management, guys we are all professionals and come to work to fly safe, just as our other fellow airbus pilots do at other carriers. oh well, let everyone start hating on my post.

take care guys.
I can 100% empathize with your post, as can many others because we lived it too.

Getting beyond the larger F9 debate for a second and strictly focusing on you and your family I would just tell you, it will get better. So it might be worth waiting for a while before you head overseas. I know a 2nd year FO who made 95K in his 2nd year. Yes he flew everyday, and was Denver based, but he did it. I personally couldn't do that, especially with a new Baby (congratulations by the way - you' know you're not a real man until you're a Dad, right? )

Have you considered moving to a base for a while? Renting a small, yet safe place, maybe get rid of one or both car payments? These are some of the things I did so I could be with my family and also make ends meet. Course I know everyone is in a different situation, and I know it's totally wrong that I had to do these things in the first place and are even suggesting them as ideas for you to consider. But again, I'm just trying to parse out the politics of the situation, and focus on the reality of what you're actually facing.

I don't really know much about the overseas stuff. I suppose if you could get nearly an equal amount of time with your wife and new baby as you would here, and do much better financially, it could be a smart move. But if it's a deal where you're worked to the bone and miss the little one's first steps and first words, even if you're making awesome money, then it's just not worth it in my humble opinion - but I see the world through my own little lens too.

We're all just trolls buddy - do whats best for you and yours - I wish you the best of luck, and thanks for sharing your plight. I hope you'll report back with your progress.
sulkair is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 11:42 AM
  #7466  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 641
Default

Originally Posted by Windsor View Post
I'm on first year pay. I have a family of 5. I knew full well what I was getting into financially. Do my sub $1000 checks suck? Absolutely. But I'm not complaining about it, because it is what it is. I was asked multiple times by multiple people if I knew and understand how low 1st year pay is. The interviewers, the runners, JP, Stephanie, the whole interview gang had mentioned it at one point or another. There was zero hiding that fact.
I am not disappointed in F9 in the least bit. It was exactly what I expected. I had low expectations for the pay and high expectations for the pilot group. That's what I've gotten so far.
The low pay will be fixed in the new contract. It absolutely has to in order for F9 to survive in the future. The well of applicants is running dry. $$ will be the only way to fix it. Any pilot with half a brain should realize that if they are not hired in 2017, upgrade will simply not happen at F9. If you are going to be a career FO, the pay rates and work rules had better be outstanding. If not, good luck filling those seats in this hiring boom.
For those new hires that are disappointed, chillax. It'll get better. It always does.
Windsor nails it! Do all of you think that the pay is going to stay where it is at? The mediation process is way ahead of schedule. You all knew coming in here what the first year pay was going to be! Do not come here if you cannot make it work.

Now about being ****ed off and morale. You are right that the majority of the group is TOTALLY ****ed off and morale does suck(towards management). For me, I try to keep morale high amongst my crews to the best of my ability. That is all I can do. We all are going to see light at the end of the tunnel. How bright is yet to be determined?

About going overseas, be careful for what you wish for(AirBuz). Is it really worth not seeing your kids grow up? A lot of our pilots went overseas to Vietnam and Asia and I can honestly say that a handful stayed out there. Majority came back. The grass is not always greener on the other side.
All I can say is be patient people. I have been here for a looong time, and our time to be rewarded is around the corner.
Bolo is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 05:40 PM
  #7467  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by xjtr View Post
Why do you say that? Is it just based on the projected new aircraft deliveries? What's to say, they don't order more new aircraft in the coming years? The ULCC market still may have room to grow. There aren't many US carriers doing international flying in the ULCC model. This is one way the company could continue to grow. I'm not saying it will happen, but I don't know if I would say you'd never upgrade at F9 if you don't get hired in 2017...
I'm interested in that comment as well?
Hou757 is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 05:59 PM
  #7468  
Gets Weekends Off
 
etflies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: KCCO
Posts: 767
Default

Originally Posted by Hou757 View Post
I'm interested in that comment as well?
I have to assume that comment was regarding our current growth plans based on the number of aircraft we're projecting in 2022. I'd be very surprised if the ULCC market doesn't continue to grow beyond then, however.
etflies is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 06:36 PM
  #7469  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Default

Originally Posted by etflies View Post
I have to assume that comment was regarding our current growth plans based on the number of aircraft we're projecting in 2022. I'd be very surprised if the ULCC market doesn't continue to grow beyond then, however.
It's a load of horse****. People getting hired now will upgrade in about 4-5 years with current projections, which include not only growth, but attrition, retirements and other factors.
DENpilot is offline  
Old 03-26-2017, 06:38 PM
  #7470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
etflies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: KCCO
Posts: 767
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot View Post
It's a load of horse****. People getting hired now will upgrade in about 4-5 years with current projections, which include not only growth, but attrition, retirements and other factors.
I don't disagree, I was commenting on a post that referenced a post that said if you're not hired this year you'll never upgrade at Frontier. Given our current plans, that's true. But I'll be surprised if the ULCC market doesn't continue to grow.
etflies is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Frontier
15
07-24-2011 07:07 PM
lolwut
Major
24
12-01-2010 03:21 AM
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
09-29-2005 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices