Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   GoJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/gojet/)
-   -   GoJet about to get whipsawed by Pinnacle (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/gojet/74420-gojet-about-get-whipsawed-pinnacle.html)

DL31082 04-21-2013 06:09 AM


Originally Posted by What (Post 1395364)
They are the same type rating!

So is the -200 but most carriers fly the -200 separate from the -700/-900.

Red97Vette 04-21-2013 06:21 AM


Originally Posted by DL31082 (Post 1395425)
So is the -200 but most carriers fly the -200 separate from the -700/-900.

The 700 and 900 are almost identical. There should be NO reason to refuse to dual qual on them. Some times I forget which I'm on if I dont think about it..

Pogey Bait 04-21-2013 06:31 AM


Originally Posted by Will (Post 1395347)
I thought PCL was going to get shut down?

Prior to DL purchase...yes. Now, no way. Pinnacle has a bright future from my perspective. Pinnacle is now cheap.

Pinnacle had one of the most senior pilot groups out there, equating to some of the highest operating costs with the old contract. Now costs are under control with the current contract in place.

Other regional airlines with senior pilot groups will suffer the same fate from there main line partners as Pinnacle has.

Slats 04-21-2013 07:03 AM


Originally Posted by Pogey Bait (Post 1395440)

Other regional airlines with senior pilot groups will suffer the same fate from there main line partners as Pinnacle has.

Other mismanaged unprofitable companies, yes...

RgrMurdock 04-21-2013 07:23 AM

Yeah I don't think it's fair to blame pilot seniority for all of PNCL's problems. The company was a mismanaged mess. And while there may be some small solace in gjet losing airplanes, constantly lowering the bar isn't anything to get excited about either.

Mason32 04-21-2013 07:49 AM


Is GoJets air service agreement up soon? I've been hearing Pinnacle will be going after those CRJ 700's. this will be funny. An airline is created, when there is no demand for it, to under cut and then they get under cut themselves.
As I understand it, gojets was created to get around the AMR scope clauses at the time. TSA could not have larger airplanes over 50 seats and keep the AMR flying.

CHQ tried it and paid hefty penalties. The whipsawing was just an added side benefit.

So, you guys can stop blaming your fellow regional pilots, and start blaming the APA... After all, it was just us limiting the size of your guppy killers that caused it. So blame us and move on, enough already.

RogerDorn 04-21-2013 08:01 AM


Originally Posted by Red97Vette (Post 1395351)
..... 'respectable' regionals...

Is that a thing??

Boomer 04-21-2013 08:36 AM


Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 1395234)
How does that make sense? By definition, a request for proposal is put out by the mainline that needs its regional service covered. Delta "owns" 9E now. So how can 9E put a bid in? And if it can, wouldn't Delta know right away if 9E will get the flying or not?

ShyGuy, remember Comair? In 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011, Delta put out RFPs for Comair flying (or should I say Delta flying that was being performed by Comair).

Each time, Comair submitted bids (as directed by Delta) to retain the flying.

Each time, Delta (supposedly) considered those bids.

Each time, Delta said "Allllllllmost, but not quite... You're too expensive"

Each time, Delta awarded RFPs to other regionals.

I know it's all f'd up, but that's how Delta does business. From 2004 until the end, Comair pilots voted in three concessionary contracts to stop the bleeding. Each time, Delta promised us (or the judge) that it would be enough to stop the bleeding. Each time, Delta would have a change of heart after the contract was signed and planes still left the property.

It didn't make sense and it wasn't logical. Most of us hung around till the end hoping common sense would kick in. Don't rely on logic trying to figure out DCI musical chairs when Delta is running the game.

RJtrashPilot 04-21-2013 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by Boomer (Post 1395496)
ShyGuy, remember Comair? In 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011, Delta put out RFPs for Comair flying (or should I say Delta flying that was being performed by Comair).

Each time, Comair submitted bids (as directed by Delta) to retain the flying.

Each time, Delta (supposedly) considered those bids.

Each time, Delta said "Allllllllmost, but not quite... You're too expensive"

Each time, Delta awarded RFPs to other regionals.

I know it's all f'd up, but that's how Delta does business. From 2004 until the end, Comair pilots voted in three concessionary contracts to stop the bleeding. Each time, Delta promised us (or the judge) that it would be enough to stop the bleeding. Each time, Delta would have a change of heart after the contract was signed and planes still left the property.

It didn't make sense and it wasn't logical. Most of us hung around till the end hoping common sense would kick in. Don't rely on logic trying to figure out DCI musical chairs when Delta is running the game.

Especially if Don "I grew up at the end of RWY 36R and love Comair'' Bornwh0rest is running the DCI freak show.

Redbird611 04-21-2013 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by DL31082 (Post 1395425)
So is the -200 but most carriers fly the -200 separate from the -700/-900.

Airlines with CRJ common category:
Mesa (only 4 200s in HI)
Pinnacle
PSA
SkyWest

Airlines not operating both variants:
American Eagle
GoJet
Air Wisconsin

Airlines with separate 200 and 700/900 categories:
ExpressJet (L-ASA)


Please correct me if I'm wrong, but who is left besides ExpressJet (L-ASA) that is actually operating CRJ-200 as a separate category?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands