Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   GoJet (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/gojet/)
-   -   GoJet about to get whipsawed by Pinnacle (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/gojet/74420-gojet-about-get-whipsawed-pinnacle.html)

Fly782 04-21-2013 08:51 AM


Originally Posted by Redbird611 (Post 1395500)
Airlines with CRJ common category:
Mesa (only 4 200s in HI)
Pinnacle
PSA
SkyWest

Airlines not operating both variants:
American Eagle
GoJet
Air Wisconsin

Airlines with separate 200 and 700/900 categories:
ExpressJet (L-ASA)


Please correct me if I'm wrong, but who is left besides ExpressJet (L-ASA) that is actually operating CRJ-200 as a separate category?


Pinnacle is separate...

Redbird611 04-21-2013 09:41 AM


Originally Posted by Fly782 (Post 1395502)
Pinnacle is separate...

I thought they'd lost that in the bankruptcy contract. Even if they haven't the number of carriers without common category for all CRJ variants is growing smaller all the time.

Flitestar 04-21-2013 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by Mason32 (Post 1395477)
As I understand it, gojets was created to get around the AMR scope clauses at the time. TSA could not have larger airplanes over 50 seats and keep the AMR flying.

CHQ tried it and paid hefty penalties. The whipsawing was just an added side benefit.

So, you guys can stop blaming your fellow regional pilots, and start blaming the APA... After all, it was just us limiting the size of your guppy killers that caused it. So blame us and move on, enough already.

At least somebody gets it.

TSA was given the shot to fly those airplanes for pay rates that their union didnt think were fair. Unfortunately TSAs contract did not have strong enough scope protection in order to play tough with the company. Union still decided to play tough, and lost.

I can understand the initial animosity among pilots then. But the hate is pointed in the wrong direction.

FlyingKat 04-21-2013 11:23 AM


Originally Posted by CrakPipeOvrheat (Post 1395259)
Maybe there is something in the future that makes pinnacle cheaper in the long run. Pinnacle pilots just signed a 7 tear contract. Are GoJet rates locked in for 7 years? What about the flight attendants, mechanics, corporate employees? Are they locked into a bad long term contracts like 9e union groups? No.

Basically the contract you just renegotiated yanked the rug out from under the Gojet pilots in their contract negotiations. If you think Hulas will negotiate a contract that will not make them the most cost effective airline out there then you are smoking crack.

IBPilot 04-21-2013 11:40 AM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1395584)
Basically the contract you just renegotiated yanked the rug out from under the Gojet pilots in their contract negotiations.



i don't care who you are, that's funny right there!:rolleyes:


did you ever stop to think that we had to negotiate against THEIR low rates with our last good contract, and that our bankrupcy contract puts us at the same level as them, if not more, with the soft pay?

and wait.....you work for trans states? have you seen your pay compared to Pinnacle? ha ha!

FlyingKat 04-21-2013 11:49 AM


Originally Posted by IBPilot (Post 1395594)
i don't care who you are, that's funny right there!:rolleyes:


did you ever stop to think that we had to negotiate against THEIR low rates with our last good contract, and that our bankrupcy contract puts us at the same level as them, if not more, with the soft pay?

Not saying the Gojet contract had no effect on PCL. What I'm saying is any hope those guys had of better payrates went out the window the day you guys voted to take concessions.

Did you seriously think those concessions would have no effect on the rest of the industry?

IBPilot 04-21-2013 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1395597)
Not saying the Gojet contract had no effect on PCL. What I'm saying is any hope those guys had of better payrates went out the window the day you guys voted to take concessions.

Did you seriously think those concessions would have no effect on the rest of the industry?

your TSA rates are only $2 more than our bankrupcy rates!!! You didn't hear pinnacle complaining and whining about your TSA rates when we were negotiating our good contract 3 years ago, and your low pay had an influence on our low bankrupcy pay!!!!! can you say hypocrite?

and like you people told us.....all you gotta do is vote NO......right?????and then you will get what you want???? So all GJ has to do is vote NO! funny how people preach just vote NO like it is so easy, until it hits THEIR pocketbooks!

Saabs 04-21-2013 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1395597)
Not saying the Gojet contract had no effect on PCL. What I'm saying is any hope those guys had of better payrates went out the window the day you guys voted to take concessions.

Did you seriously think those concessions would have no effect on the rest of the industry?

Our concessions were voted on by us for us, not go jets. Any effect our concessions have on the rest of the industry were the least of our worries, as we were voting for OUR company.

PCLCREW 04-21-2013 11:57 AM



Originally Posted by IBPilot (Post 1395594)
i don't care who you are, that's funny right there!:rolleyes:


did you ever stop to think that we had to negotiate against THEIR low rates with our last good contract, and that our bankrupcy contract puts us at the same level as them, if not more, with the soft pay?

Not saying the Gojet contract had no effect on PCL. What I'm saying is any hope those guys had of better payrates went out the window the day you guys voted to take concessions.

Did you seriously think those concessions would have no effect on the rest of the industry?
One of the reasons why we took concessions is GoJet, amount other things.
I was a no vote, but if we had gone out of business another DCI carrier would have been forced to lower their rates.
That is in direct relation to GoJet and Compass, because they're both very junior and cheap.
Express Jet will be next. Sad but true.

TBucket 04-21-2013 01:42 PM


Originally Posted by Flitestar (Post 1395558)
At least somebody gets it.

TSA was given the shot to fly those airplanes for pay rates that their union didnt think were fair. Unfortunately TSAs contract did not have strong enough scope protection in order to play tough with the company. Union still decided to play tough, and lost.

I can understand the initial animosity among pilots then. But the hate is pointed in the wrong direction.


Funny, but CHQ flies for american and pilots on their SAME SENIORITY LIST fly 70 seaters for united. So, tell me again how Hulas couldn't do the same thing? Oh, wait, that's because the real reason gojet was created was to get around TSA's union, not AMR scope.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands