Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
Unluckiest Generation >

Unluckiest Generation

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Unluckiest Generation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2020, 05:28 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
It was fought over the right to secede.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_cen...sa_scarsec.asp

The Southern states seceded because they feared Lincoln would outlaw slavery
Rightup is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:10 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by Rightup View Post
The Southern states seceded because they feared Lincoln would outlaw slavery
No one is disputing that. But the states had a right to secede which the union government violated.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:15 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tr1 View Post
the reason they wanted to secede is because the South Confederacy feared the North and the Republicans were going to abolish slavery.
Yes that is correct. But slavery was only 1 of several reasons they wanted to secede.



Originally Posted by Av8tr1 View Post
Ironically Lincoln didn't want to abolish slavery. He was concerned it would split the country and said so in his inauguration speech. Turns out he was right. The war started when Lincoln tried to resupply the Federally managed (and owned) fortification Fort Sumter which was part of the Third Wave for national defense. South Carolina has given up the land Fort Sumter was built on for the defense of the nation. Now they wanted it back. So they tried to take it. And that's when the fight started.
Once SC left the Union the Union was obligated to give that land back to SC since SC was no longer part of the Union. The Union was in violation and started the war against Southern independence. SC left the Union peacefully as they had a right to do under the Constitution and natural law.




Originally Posted by Av8tr1 View Post
That's what makes things like the federalist papers so important in understanding history.
The Anti-Federalist Papers are a much better read:

https://www.amazon.com/Anti-Federali...s%2C250&sr=8-3
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:30 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Av8tr1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: And hold
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Yes that is correct. But slavery was only 1 of several reasons they wanted to secede.
Ok what were the other reasons?


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Once SC left the Union the Union was obligated to give that land back to SC since SC was no longer part of the Union. The Union was in violation and started the war against Southern independence. SC left the Union peacefully as they had a right to do under the Constitution and natural law.
On what do you base this on? The following was the actual wording from the agreement.

From the Committee on Federal Relations In the House of Representatives, December 31st, 1836"The Committee on Federal relations, to which was referred the Governor's message, relating to the site of Fort Sumter, in the harbour of Charleston, and the report of the Committee on Federal Relations from the Senate on the same subject, beg leave to Report by Resolution:

"Resolved, That this state do cede to the United States, all the right, title and claim of South Carolina to the site of Fort Sumter and the requisite quantity of adjacent territory, Provided, That all processes, civil and criminal issued under the authority of this State, or any officer thereof, shall and may be served and executed upon the same, and any person there being who may be implicated by law; and that the said land, site and structures enumerated, shall be forever exempt from liability to pay any tax to this state.

"Also resolved: That the State shall extinguish the claim, if any valid claim there be, of any individuals under the authority of this State, to the land hereby ceded.

"Resolved, That this House to agree. Ordered that it be sent to the Senate for concurrence. By order of the House:

"T. W. Glover, C. H. R."
"In Senate, December 21st, 1836


Basically South Carolina ceded Fort Sumter, at least the sandbar it rests on, to the Federal Government and then tried to take it back. They gave up ALL rights to the land before secession. Quoting the agreement "all the right, title and claim of South Carolina to the site" They sold the cow and then tried to get it back without paying for it.
Av8tr1 is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 07:36 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,918
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tr1 View Post
Sorry to thread jack, but you bring up an important point.

Maybe this might be a good time to revisit the idea of "Seniority". Personally I don't think it's a good system. I can get behind a industry wide "seniority" so that the 777 captain doesn't have to start his/her entire career over at a new company. I think pay scales based on number of hours in a log book makes a heck of a lot more sense than what we have now. And makes companies work a lot harder to attract and retain talent. Much better for pilots. The way we have it now pilots can't jump ship for a better company that treats its employees better since they lose their "seniority" thus "seniority" works better for airline management than pilots.
My Dad was a Merchant Marine his entire career. Started in 1942 when they were the only ones who would take a man with asthma. At that point in the war they'd take anyone with a pulse. He retired in the mid 1970's. His union was the Masters, Mates, and Pilots (MM&P). All work came thru the Union Hall (National Seniority List). If the company that owned the US Flagged Ship needed a Chief Mate on down they called the Union Hall who would then check and see who was next up on the list and offer them the cruise. They could take it or pass. Airline Pilots would be so much better off if they could have put aside differences and formed a national union with just one contract, maybe with minor variations to suit the particular circumstances of a carrier.
AirBear is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 08:08 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tr1 View Post

Basically South Carolina ceded Fort Sumter, at least the sandbar it rests on, to the Federal Government and then tried to take it back. They gave up ALL rights to the land before secession. Quoting the agreement "all the right, title and claim of South Carolina to the site" They sold the cow and then tried to get it back without paying for it.
Fascinating... assuming there is no spin there I did not realize that. Learn something new every day...

I guess the question becomes that once SC severed ties with the Union if that specific agreement would still legally be in effect? Obviously the Union would argue yes, and SC would argue no. I'm not a lawyer but it would seem there may have been precedent with international/contract law? I dunno.

On the other hand SC did have a good point that when the Union tried to resupply Sumter that was an act of war by the Union.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 05-31-2020, 08:58 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Av8tr1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: And hold
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Fascinating... assuming there is no spin there I did not realize that. Learn something new every day...

I guess the question becomes that once SC severed ties with the Union if that specific agreement would still legally be in effect? Obviously the Union would argue yes, and SC would argue no. I'm not a lawyer but it would seem there may have been precedent with international/contract law? I dunno.

On the other hand SC did have a good point that when the Union tried to resupply Sumter that was an act of war by the Union.
hey man I was as shocked as you to learn some of this. Was an eye opener when I started to research into the dogma we have all been taught growing up.


im not a lawyer either, though I did study it in college. I stupidly wanted to be a lawyer when I grew up. Fortunately I never grew up and became a pilot instead.

so I can’t answer the question about the laws here either. But regardless the commander of Fort Sumter surrendered the fort to the confederacy so at that point it was theirs.

point being there is a LOT of misunderstanding around the civil war.
Av8tr1 is offline  
Old 06-07-2020, 09:41 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tr1 View Post
Agreed. I think anyone born (in the US) since the 50s has no idea what real difficulties are. Even our homeless are better off than many third world countries. Friend of mine came here illegally (many years ago) from Mexico. He grew up in a actual "mud hut". Did not eat every day. Meanwhile I walked past a homeless guy recently living in a coleman tent with a propane heater while surfing the internets on a dell laptop computer using (I am assuming) cell phone hotspot (or leaching off a local free wifi).

We live in the richest country in the world. Our poor and homeless have it better than most of the third world. Boo Hoo you lost your nearly 100k a year in your early 20s. Welcome to reality.
You're qualified to say this because you "walked by a homeless guy?" You've gotta be trolling us.
hydrostream is offline  
Old 06-07-2020, 12:33 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Av8tr1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Position: And hold
Posts: 311
Default

Originally Posted by hydrostream View Post
You're qualified to say this because you "walked by a homeless guy?" You've gotta be trolling us.
No I am qualified to say this from my military and civil service all over the world for nearly 2 decades in some pretty ugly 3rd world countries. Some might qualify for 4th world recognition. I say that not to look down on people but that people in these places have it pretty bad compared to even our homeless. Like my friend who came from Mexico whose family lived in an actual mud hut. He is now a well known chef (not famous but known in the community) in Seattle married to a wonderful woman with a daughter who just went into the Coast Guard. She wants to be a pilot and I took her for her first flight over to the restaurant at the Bremerton airport. She's been hooked on flying ever since. Pretty good for a guy who started in a actual mud hut.

(Although I visited a place that would be considered 4th world and I envied those people for the lack of technology and modern comforts. Something to be said for that.)

The homeless guy was Downtown Seattle 3rd and Lenora street by the social services office where he got things like free healthcare and a meal or two. He would camp out by the local Starbucks. Had a nice dell laptop. I could see him playing World of Warcraft as I walked by at least once. Soooo......I'm gonna say he's doing better than the old guy in a to be unnamed chithole in the middle east that I saw with both legs AND an arm missing, drooling on himself on a dirt path basically just lying next to the road. He was actually a landmark for the troops. I am 85% sure he was alive for the week or so I was in country.

Feel free to verify this next time you are in Seattle. While you are down near 3rd and Lenora, where the social services offices are, I recommend the Pho place down 2 blocks (local Pho?) where you can sit at a table near the window and watch the homeless go about their day in one of the richest cities in the nation where our homeless most definitely have it better than most in 3rd world chitholes. I would avoid the parking garage up by Bed Bath and Beyond. It smells like a outhouse because the homeless all around there use it as such.
Av8tr1 is offline  
Old 06-07-2020, 12:47 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
All of this misery was caused by the government.
And the executive branch, to be specific.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hurricane757
American
11
02-18-2014 12:59 PM
dino1pilot
Regional
104
08-24-2012 12:41 PM
gtechpilot
Regional
1
03-21-2012 06:18 AM
DYNASTY HVY
Hangar Talk
34
03-11-2009 03:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices