Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk
I think things will turn around soon >

I think things will turn around soon

Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

I think things will turn around soon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2008, 08:28 PM
  #361  
Line Holder
 
sunnfun's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B777 Cpt.
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by Rhino Driver View Post
"Enron loophole." Speculation is attributed to at least 1/3, some say more, of the price of a barrel of oil. Bring back the regulation, kill the speculation, and oil comes down to $60-80 per barrel, maybe less IMHO.
The legislation that led to the enron loophole was, among others, passed by Sen. Phil Gramm. His wife was on the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission. A few days after she got the ball rolling on the exemption, Wendy Gramm resigned from the commission. Enron soon appointed her to its board of directors.

Guess what Phil Gramm is doing today? He's McCains Chief Economist Advisor and campaign co-chair.

There you go. It all makes sense again.
sunnfun is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 05:41 AM
  #362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by Boogie Nights View Post
... I still do not know why they taxi 2 engine!
Because most jet engines require a 3 minute warm up and the vast majority of SWA planes are airborne 3 minutes after pushback...
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 06:49 AM
  #363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Thread moved out of the Major forum to Hangar Talk as per the last few pages here.
de727ups is offline  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:24 AM
  #364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups View Post
Thread moved out of the Major forum to Hangar Talk as per the last few pages here.
How about a link???
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 06:17 AM
  #365  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Boogie Nights's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: KC135 IP
Posts: 398
Default If it looks like a bubble it probably is

If It Looks Like a Bubble,?
Boogie Nights is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 07:16 AM
  #366  
Indian Takeout Driver
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FAR part 347 (91+121+135)
Posts: 1,566
Default

Originally Posted by WhizWheel View Post
Ummm, your retort is "watch the history channel please"???? Fella please tell me that Wikipedia and The History Channel are not your primary sources for why you can further the argument that Iraq had no WMD, even AFTER sanctions. The fact remains that WMD were found on Iraqi soil (errr sand) long after sanctions were imposed. You've had too much leftist Kool Aid in thinking otherwise.

Dude, give it a break.... even the Bush Administration has since given up on the WMD argument.. we're now onto Al Queda and War on Terror as the reason. Next, after this president is out of office, the truth will come out and we'll just come right out and admit it.. oil.
CE750 is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 07:28 AM
  #367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,383
Default

Originally Posted by Boogie Nights View Post

I was getting excited about the article until the last sentence......"however, this bubble is likely to deflate only partly, before resuming its climb until alternatives displace oil as our primary energy sources"
Learflyer is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 09:37 AM
  #368  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by CE750 View Post
Dude, give it a break.... even the Bush Administration has since given up on the WMD argument.. we're now onto Al Queda and War on Terror as the reason. Next, after this president is out of office, the truth will come out and we'll just come right out and admit it.. oil.
Knock it off CE750 - are you saying the thousands of Kurds who're gassed to death died of what - pollution? Give me a break - you're a revisionist, that's all. I don't care how they got those chemical weapons; the fact is those were MD weapons.

The only way we'll find out the whole truth is NOT when we have a new president because that president will still have to rely on our intelligence agencies which as you pointed out weren’t always correct in their assessments of Iraq’s weapons program.

We'll have to wait for Syria to become an open society and only then will the truth come out. There is a reason to why Iraq let in a bunch of Russian special ops forces right before the war. No one knows what happened to their weapons program but it was there before, no one could account for its destruction thus it must have been hidden or evacuated 'somewhere' - Syria is the safest bet since they're a strong Russian ally and the Socialist Arab Baath party in power there is of the same branch Saddam belonged to.

Your hate for Bush makes you very color blind - you discount anything bad that our enemies might have done and put all the blame squarely on us.

I do remember the days Ronald Reagan was vilified as a war monger, American terrorist, etc, in Europe and elsewhere. I lived in Europe then and frankly the treatment Reagan received by the Europeans then was harsher than Bush ever got. Bush is disliked and has no respect over there - Reagan was hated - after all, he wanted to bring nuclear war to Europe! That's how the lefties portrayed him and people bought it.

People were wrong then but they didn’t realize it until some 10-15 years later. I personally think Bush sucked as a president but for different reason than you do. He turned into an illegal amnesty proponent; he didn't even try to control spending in order to placate the leftist congress, etc, etc.

When it comes to the war on terror though, I think history will judge him very positively, however it'll have to take 10-15 years again before the world realizes what was really happening in the Middle East... Just my take on it…

Russian Intelligence, Belarus & Highway 11
Part 3 of a 5

Did Russian Ambassador Give Saddam the U.S. War Plan?

Last edited by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE; 06-26-2008 at 09:49 AM.
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 10:01 AM
  #369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 396
Default

Previous Presidential Administrations, to remain nameless in order to preserve "fair and balanced reporting", played a significant role in arming Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi military...still have the haunting memory of Don Rumsfeld shaking hands w/ Saddam Hussein and having the biggest smile I've ever seen on a diplomat's face. Of course, Iraq was battling the Iranians in a brutal 10 year war, we heavily armed the Iraqis as a result, but obviously our government at that time did not put much thought into the long-term implications of that decision.

Now, as a nation, we're paying for those decisions.

How does it affect our aviation industry and a turn-around? I don't know, seems like I had always remembered people say that war was good for the economy, but a quick look around and it doesn't really seem like this war has helped our economy out much. At least I'm not getting any positive vibes.

So now we've got the mother of all bad combinations going on: High fuel costs, shoddy economy, the credit crunch, staggering forclosure rates (now the average American loses much of their purchasing power...attached to the value of their homes), a pathetically weak dollar, and an unbelievable national debt, just to name a few.
The Duke is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 10:04 AM
  #370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
Previous Presidential Administrations, to remain nameless in order to preserve "fair and balanced reporting", played a significant role in arming Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi military...still have the haunting memory of Don Rumsfeld shaking hands w/ Saddam Hussein and having the biggest smile I've ever seen on a diplomat's face. Of course, Iraq was battling the Iranians in a brutal 10 year war, we heavily armed the Iraqis as a result, but obviously our government at that time did not put much thought into the long-term implications of that decision.

Now, as a nation, we're paying for those decisions...
Irrelevant - the US traded heavily with the Nazi Germany up until right before the war. Didn’t change the fact that once the war started we were all on the same side.
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wild Bill
Cargo
0
01-08-2008 05:43 PM
PiperDriver
Hangar Talk
37
12-24-2007 12:50 PM
Sluggo_63
Cargo
12
12-08-2007 09:17 AM
KnightFlyer
Cargo
3
07-21-2007 05:36 AM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
9
05-27-2006 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices