Search
Notices
Hangar Talk For non-aviation-related discussion and aviation threads that don't belong elsewhere

Stephen Sharp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2010, 07:17 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 41
Default

It seems if somebody wants to do you in, all they have to do is report you as to Homelandland Security, as you being a, "Home Grown" Terrorist, the machine will do the rest.

Homegrown terrorists I am hearing more and more about them on Fox news. Question, If you track down and follow a Homegrown terrorist to its Lair, and you "smoke" it! Is that considered good or bad?
horusfalcon is offline  
Old 05-02-2010, 08:55 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoStep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 309
Default

After reading the original thread and Steven's defense, it got me to thinking...(I know...shocking, eh?)

-I'd hate to be the target of some over-zealous DA trying to make a name for themselves by trampling on me.
-Once you have a drug test, it's not tested in your presence, lab people make mistakes too, and you can even get false positive results from pregnancy tests.
-I've been tested 6 times in one year...they don't want positives, so if you're clean, your # comes up more often.
-Testing is a witch hunt...if it was about safety, you'd never get tested after your trip.
BUT

-Come on, dude...you're an airline pilot selling drug cleansing products on a site called "yourintheclear.com"...with a pun on urine...really??!!
-This holistic voodoo "body cleansing" (nudge-nudge-wink) is crap, and there are rarely ever "false positives" that Mr. Sharp says exist.
-I've been around enough stoners that I don't want them in my cockpit or using products to evade drug tests.
-I liked flying better when pilots smoked Lucky Strikes, and they only had to worry about the V.D. test from the long layover in 'Po City...
NoStep is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 03:19 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by NoStep View Post
After reading the original thread and Steven's defense, it got me to thinking...(I know...shocking, eh?)

-I'd hate to be the target of some over-zealous DA trying to make a name for themselves by trampling on me.
-Once you have a drug test, it's not tested in your presence, lab people make mistakes too, and you can even get false positive results from pregnancy tests.
-I've been tested 6 times in one year...they don't want positives, so if you're clean, your # comes up more often.
-Testing is a witch hunt...if it was about safety, you'd never get tested after your trip.
BUT

-Come on, dude...you're an airline pilot selling drug cleansing products on a site called "yourintheclear.com"...with a pun on urine...really??!!
-This holistic voodoo "body cleansing" (nudge-nudge-wink) is crap, and there are rarely ever "false positives" that Mr. Sharp says exist.
-I've been around enough stoners that I don't want them in my cockpit or using products to evade drug tests.
-I liked flying better when pilots smoked Lucky Strikes, and they only had to worry about the V.D. test from the long layover in 'Po City...
Bingo, took the words out of my mouth.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 01:18 PM
  #24  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 4
Default

I have to disagree. He was selling this since 1997 as he stated. All of a sudden he becomes an airline pilot and is supposed to stop selling something that clearly is not illegal. While maybe bad ethics, legally wrong no way. I bet you 1000 to 1 he has no partake in any drug use either. Went to his online store and they do sell drug tests and such. Why the hell can't you clean your body??? I don't care if your an airline pilot or ballerina, there have been times when I have been at a party and there was pot smoking. As I usually leave the room or premises there is a good chance the second hand smoke may affect a drug test. Did you know there is cocaine traces on 90% of money bills? Nope you didn't, see here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/science/18obcoke.html

This is a blatant "Make An Example Out Of Him" example. I have been in this business for 20+ years and our constitutional rights are chit on every day. If he was a drug user which I doubt then for god sakes make a better drug test not put this guy out to pasture.

And to NOSTEP you obviously wear your uniform with pride but have no intellectual insight. You really think there are stoners in the cockpits?? The wool is heavily pulled over your eye lids. There all false positives all the time, maybe not in the airline genre but there are so many things that cause false positives.

See here:
False Positives on Drug Tests

I side with the pilot on this one.
unitedpilot is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 03:23 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by NoStep View Post
-This holistic voodoo "body cleansing" (nudge-nudge-wink) is crap, and there are rarely ever "false positives" that Mr. Sharp says exist.
False-positives do exist and are a very real threat. There has been plenty research done, plenty has been written on the subject. Many drug-testing procedures ask you to list any medications you may be taking. This is because of the risk of creating a false-positive. There are other causes as unitedpilot points out in above post. A false-positive is not Sharp's creation as you imply.

Also, they are many many products available designed to flush toxins from your system. Many supplements, such as Milk Thistle, naturally clean the liver, for example. Cranberries have been known to clear the urinary tract and so on. There is a large market for cleansing products which have nothing to do with drug testing. There are also body-cleansing diets, such as the lemon diet and other fasts. Toxins in the body are known causes of disease. In fact, anything organic is a hot item today for this very reason. People are searching for ways to live longer and staying healthy by reducing toxins in the body. Nothing voodoo about it.
AKASHA is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 04:57 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by AKASHA View Post
False-positives do exist and are a very real threat. There has been plenty research done, plenty has been written on the subject. Many drug-testing procedures ask you to list any medications you may be taking. This is because of the risk of creating a false-positive. There are other causes as unitedpilot points out in above post. A false-positive is not Sharp's creation as you imply.

Also, they are many many products available designed to flush toxins from your system. Many supplements, such as Milk Thistle, naturally clean the liver, for example. Cranberries have been known to clear the urinary tract and so on. There is a large market for cleansing products which have nothing to do with drug testing. There are also body-cleansing diets, such as the lemon diet and other fasts. Toxins in the body are known causes of disease. In fact, anything organic is a hot item today for this very reason. People are searching for ways to live longer and staying healthy by reducing toxins in the body. Nothing voodoo about it.

Maybe there is a legitimate marketplace for the items he is selling, however it tip toes around the notion of ensuring a clean drug test by cleansing the body. Like it or not, it implies a method that will positively influence the results of a federally mandated drug test.

It is the equivalent of an individual creating a plastic handgun that is said to be made from biodegradable materials while being lightweight and easier to shoot. I would bet the TSA would REALLY be interested in such a device, and rightfully so.

There a certain things in life people should not tip toe around, and this pilot should have known better regardless of when he got involved his company.
DeadHead is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 05:10 PM
  #27  
Flying Farmer
 
Ewfflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Posts: 3,160
Default

Anyone remember the Duke rape case? There was a DA that was so determined to get his case he ruined tons of lives, for nothing. There are plenty in the power positions that want to have "their big case" that everyone can associate to.

I don't know the facts, so I can't judge on either side, but it wouldn't be the first time someone with a law-degree really thought they had someone, and had just enough power to ruin their lives just to get a plea. And also not the first time someone has done something illegal and maybe gotten away with just a slap on the wrist.

Personally, I think there are bigger problems to solve, and just shows you how much of a waste the overall system is. What good has come of this result?
Ewfflyer is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 06:06 PM
  #28  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 4
Default Side With Pilot

[quote=DeadHead;805780]Like it or not, it implies a method that will positively influence the results of a federally mandated drug test.
quote]

Unless the website was www.DearAirlinePilotBeatYourFederallyMandatedDrugT est.com then you as I said are uneducated on our privacy laws. I guess our 5th and 6th amendment rights are no good right?? See you don't even know what they are because your prestiguous "Ailrine Pilot" title is what matters. Get off your high horse and down to what is really illegal here to constitute this misdeameanor or felony charge whatever it is. How can someone sell a drug test drink to pilots right????? That is everyone's first response. We don't even know if he sold it to even one pilot do we?

Please spare me your banter. If he was a drug user or actually sold to pilots then this will be revealed. Have you seen his guys web site?? Well I have and I truly think this was purely a selective prosecution and have no idea who this dude is. Chit he probably jump seated with me today and I would probably give him a tighter handshake rather than a shrug on my shoulders.
His airline career is now in the chitter forever basically as well as his reputation if he had any. This whole story smells like chit.

I side with the pilot.

Last edited by unitedpilot; 05-03-2010 at 06:14 PM. Reason: Grammar
unitedpilot is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 07:36 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by unitedpilot View Post
As I usually leave the room or premises there is a good chance the second hand smoke may affect a drug test.
This is the most popular defense (tied with "it was in the Brownies" my cousin made) of every young Marine and Sailor that comes to NJP for a popped drug test. Second hand smoke is not going to cause a pop. I've seen the tests before, I've talked personally with the docs and the people that make and do the tests, and I've had personal experience with producing the evidence to show that said young Marine/Sailor could not/did not inhale enough second hand smoke to pop on the P-test.
I'll side with the docs and scientists on this one.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 05-03-2010, 07:42 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoStep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by unitedpilot View Post
I have to disagree....

.....I have been in this business for 20+ years

And to NOSTEP you obviously wear your uniform with pride but have no intellectual insight. You really think there are stoners in the cockpits?? ...

See here:
False Positives on Drug Tests

I side with the pilot on this one.
Well, "Unitedpilot", you obviously missed the sarcasm in some of my remarks. But since you brought up intellect...

It's intellectually dishonest to sell drug test kits and a "cleansing" product on a website with a double-entendre of "urine", (i.e. www.yourintheclear.com). Even Mr. Sharp admits how that appears.
It's similar to head shops selling "tobacco" bongs. Not illegal, but everyone knows what they're used for.

I've also been kicking around the airline business for 20+ years, and only know of 1 positive drug test...and it wasn't a false-positive, (a flight attendant who had problems). How many are you aware of? (I agree, even 1 false-positive is too many when it destroys a person's life) That's a pretty good track record, and allowing split samples (if you can pee that much) manages the risk of false-positive.

He either doesn't know at all what impression his products and websites imply, or he's got a serious lack of judgement, given his position at a 121 carrier.

Agree to disagree...

Last edited by NoStep; 05-03-2010 at 08:27 PM.
NoStep is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LostInAsia
PSA Airlines
53
05-02-2010 05:38 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
04-26-2009 03:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices