AA Hiring update
10-05-2013 | 08:54 AM
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
This seems logical. I can't imagine anyone caring about the difference between C172 and Piper Warrior time at the 121 level. Or at any level. Can you guys?
10-05-2013 | 11:12 AM
#82
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Don't know what I don't know
"Then I added my Military times in one lump per aircraft because I couldn't stand the idea of continuing."
10-05-2013 | 12:16 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 97
This seems logical. I can't imagine anyone caring about the difference between C172 and Piper Warrior time at the 121 level. Or at any level. Can you guys?
10-05-2013 | 04:17 PM
#86
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Anyone else having trouble in the employment history section? Every time I save a new employer, it mixed some information of one employer with another or duplicating some information but with another employer's name. This "state-of-the-art" technology is giving me hypertension.
10-06-2013 | 05:44 AM
#87
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: T-38 IP
Just wondering if anybody has experience with airlines pushing back or accepting this? I have several years to update in my electronic logbook and will go line by line if required, but will also jump at making one lump entry for mil jets if the option doesn't cause trouble later on.
10-06-2013 | 12:10 PM
#89
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,427
Likes: 427
I have kept a logbook my entire career and only took that to my interview. The other mil guy just brought his flight time print out from the ARMS folks (you can also get it on the portal). They didn't seem to care either way.
10-07-2013 | 08:22 AM
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
