Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
Scope above all?  Why exposed for so long? >

Scope above all? Why exposed for so long?

Search

Notices

Scope above all? Why exposed for so long?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:00 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jtrain609
I'm saying this pilot group made a mistake by not voting in a union sooner.

The TA was done about when it should have been. 3 years to do a full contract is about right.
All they did was copy paste 70% of the PEA and FSM. What took so long?
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:03 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Jtrain, softpay and the other experts that think Skywest is about to be painted blue any day now, why did the company roll over on RJ scope but build a fortress around domestic codesharing?
Ok so then are you the expert? What do other contracts codesharing sections look like? Yes we all know what Southwest’s is but what about everyone else?
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:04 AM
  #13  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Jtrain, softpay and the other experts that think Skywest is about to be painted blue any day now, why did the company roll over on RJ scope but build a fortress around domestic codesharing?
Jetblue was never gonna do a lot of things until they decided they wanted to do it.
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:05 AM
  #14  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas
All they did was copy paste 70% of the PEA and FSM. What took so long?
pretty sure that's not how it went... good story though.
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:13 AM
  #15  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
Jetblue was never gonna do a lot of things until they decided they wanted to do it.
And JetBlue never gives up something it holds sacred. So what did they give up in the scope section and what did they build a fortress around in the scope section?
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:17 AM
  #16  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by rvr1800
Ok so then are you the expert? What do other contracts codesharing sections look like? Yes we all know what Southwest’s is but what about everyone else?
Well, Southwest IS the model we should be striving for. But, why are you asking me what scope sections say instead of asking yourself why JetBlue rolled over on RJ scope and built a fortress around domestic codesharing?
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:23 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
Jetblue was never gonna do a lot of things until they decided they wanted to do it.
Exactly.

Mint was never going to happen. Flying to as much of the Carribean wasn't part of the business plan. The 190's didn't fit the single fleet concept.

RJ's don't make sense until they do. When that happens I want protections.
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:30 AM
  #18  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

Originally Posted by Bluedriver
And JetBlue never gives up something it holds sacred. So what did they give up in the scope section and what did they build a fortress around in the scope section?
I dunno man, You'd have to ask Nate, Jeff, or Tommy.
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:38 AM
  #19  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
I dunno man, You'd have to ask Nate, Jeff, or Tommy.
BS. They don't KNOW what the company truly intends to do. They fought to get the best scope language the company WOULD AGREE TO.

Now, it's up to you, me and the rest of us to understand why the company gave what it gave and built a fortress around certain things.

I'm glad we have RJ language, very glad. Time will tell why they were willing to give that up, but not domestic codeshare.
Reply
Old 07-05-2018 | 09:39 AM
  #20  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by jtrain609
Exactly.

Mint was never going to happen. Flying to as much of the Carribean wasn't part of the business plan. The 190's didn't fit the single fleet concept.

RJ's don't make sense until they do. When that happens I want protections.
You're a real rocket surgeon dude.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CAL EWR
United
44
11-26-2012 01:29 PM
Scoop
Major
90
05-26-2012 10:02 AM
AAflyer
Major
101
03-27-2010 06:39 AM
Bucking Bar
Major
143
09-05-2009 04:39 PM
FoxHunter
Cargo
104
06-09-2006 04:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices