Search

Notices

Yes vs. no

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2018 | 07:52 PM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by queue
Reserve people aren't well covered by this TA.

Consider this legal scenario:
  • You just signed up with a new cell phone service provider (or your existing one has temporary outtages).
  • BJ pushes an assignment to you via JETCRW.
  • You fail to acknowledge it and you don't see it on your phone until you get the notification and realize report time was 15 minutes ago.
  • Now you have a "missed trip" on your Dependability Policy.
Now read the TA. Find me the language that defines positive contact in the context of JETCRW. Sure, it talks about it in regards to voice communications, but that isn't explicitly extended to JETCRW. Where is the language that defines what positive contact is in the context of JETCRW? Is it merely enough for BJ to push the data? What if an isolated technological fault occurs? Will they believe you or will you be treated as a liar?

Either way, if it's not in the contract, it doesn't exist. Don't let anyone else tell you otherwise because that is the legal standard. The alternative argument is: why bother having a contract if we could simply use assumptions & expectations to litigate everything?

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.

Positive Contact: When a Pilot and Crew Services speak on a recorded line or when two-way communication occurs between a Pilot and Crew Services via JETCRW.



The Pilot has to acknowledge the assignment on JETCRW, scheduling can't just push it to JETCRW and say good enough.....must be acknowledged.
Reply
Old 07-19-2018 | 07:58 PM
  #22  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SmitteyB
The implementation LOA alone is really scary, honestly. 12/31/2019 for some of the best provisions is concerning.

There should have been financial penalties associated with the Company not delivering an acceptable schedule for adhering to this contract.

BUT....BUT

We have to judge this document on its merits and compare it to what the alternate outcome is. I don't believe in any possible way that we would achieve another AIP for at least a year. Are the holes worth holding up for a year at the earliest? I haven't decided yet.

Please explain in detail what's so "scary" about the LOA. I'd love to hear it. Two of the biggest desires of the company are held back until basically LCR and redeye protections in Section 12 are implemented. For the record, Sabre was given a laundry list of items and requests of how long to turn on, they gave us times on almost all but could not reasonably pinpoint a few.....hence the backstop date of Dec 2019.


The company fought for years to lessen the grip of the Return to OSP language, which is by far industry leading. Also, the company has a strong desire to fly to Europe, so Section 14 is extremely important to them. Both of those items are restricted until ALL of our stuff we want is turned on.
Reply
Old 07-19-2018 | 08:40 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by expectholding
I would've been ****ed if the mec withheld this from my vote and didnt give me and my wife the opportunity to look at it. not only gains in all cornerstones, but top of the industry in job protection, more time off, etc. meanwhile im making less than our fellow pilots at spirit and hanging out with frontier at the bottom of the industry. no thanks. not voting out of fear here.
Top of the industry job protection? Then why are all the other majors hiring so rapidly if their job protection is so lousy?
Reply
Old 07-19-2018 | 09:14 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Curtaindriver
Positive Contact: When a Pilot and Crew Services speak on a recorded line or when two-way communication occurs between a Pilot and Crew Services via JETCRW.



The Pilot has to acknowledge the assignment on JETCRW, scheduling can't just push it to JETCRW and say good enough.....must be acknowledged.
Great, but you didn't get the last part from the text of the TA. You inserted assumption. The 2 way paradigm is irrelevant to the mechanism of the technology. You are interpreting it through the eyes of assumption, not through contractual precision.


The Railway Labor Act Simplified

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Reply
Old 07-19-2018 | 09:16 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Curtaindriver
Please explain in detail what's so "scary" about the LOA. I'd love to hear it. Two of the biggest desires of the company are held back until basically LCR and redeye protections in Section 12 are implemented. For the record, Sabre was given a laundry list of items and requests of how long to turn on, they gave us times on almost all but could not reasonably pinpoint a few.....hence the backstop date of Dec 2019.


The company fought for years to lessen the grip of the Return to OSP language, which is by far industry leading. Also, the company has a strong desire to fly to Europe, so Section 14 is extremely important to them. Both of those items are restricted until ALL of our stuff we want is turned on.
Which is why we have the leverage to bargain for a far better TA 2, besides the fact of a historical record breaking economy, pilot shortage, etc...

Now is the time to demand treatment as a professional.

The Railway Labor Act Simplified

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Reply
Old 07-20-2018 | 03:48 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Curtaindriver
Positive Contact: When a Pilot and Crew Services speak on a recorded line or when two-way communication occurs between a Pilot and Crew Services via JETCRW.



The Pilot has to acknowledge the assignment on JETCRW, scheduling can't just push it to JETCRW and say good enough.....must be acknowledged.
Exept when on reserve. The clock starts when your phone chimes. *Ding* at 3 am.

Missed it? Sleeping? Dropped by cell network? Jet crew app misbehaving?

TOO BAD. The clock is now ticking on your report. They attempted PC.

Read. The. Contract.

The call-out period for a Short Call Reserve shall be no less than two
hours and thirty minutes (2:30) from the initial Positive Contact attempt.

Last edited by PasserOGas; 07-20-2018 at 04:02 AM.
Reply
Old 07-20-2018 | 05:05 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Default

Positive Contact is actually defined in the TA. It’s in Section 2 - Definitions.
Reply
Old 07-20-2018 | 05:17 AM
  #28  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas
Exept when on reserve. The clock starts when your phone chimes. *Ding* at 3 am.

Missed it? Sleeping? Dropped by cell network? Jet crew app misbehaving?

TOO BAD. The clock is now ticking on your report. They attempted PC.

Read. The. Contract.

The call-out period for a Short Call Reserve shall be no less than two
hours and thirty minutes (2:30) from the initial Positive Contact attempt.
I think he KNOWS the contract Passer. But I'm interested in your last point. Hopefully a JC notification for your reserve assignment isn't enough. Hopefully in the case of a short-callout they need to actually call you because you are correct, a single JetCrew ding (mine is silent) isn't going to wake me up.
Reply
Old 07-20-2018 | 05:38 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Default

Notification of Assignment
a. The Company shall notify a Reserve Pilot of a Pairing assignment via
JETCRW at the time the Pairing is placed on the Pilot’s schedule. For Pairing assignments made after the DRO has been published, if a Pilot has not acknowledged the assignment at the applicable Reserve callout time,
the Company shall establish Positive Contact.

I think the positive contact “attempt” only comes into play if you don’t answer your phone, like it is today. That being said, it’s not crystal clear and I wouldn’t be surprised by anything this company tries.
Reply
Old 07-20-2018 | 05:49 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
Positive Contact is actually defined in the TA. It’s in Section 2 - Definitions.
It doesn't explicitly define positive contact for software. The advertised definition doesn't work with software.

The Railway Labor Act Simplified

This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices