SWA or JB?
#141
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 556
Likes: 2
I could write a book about this, but I'll try to keep it short.
Over the years there's been a continuous erosion of QOL/benefits thru many unilateral changes made by the company. There used to be a ton of anti-union guys at JB (hence why it took 3 votes to get a union on property), but JB in the last few years has managed to get 2 unions on property, with more coming. That should paint the management picture. The labor dispute with the pilots didn't help (with management basically saying "while we can afford to pay you guys industry leading pay, we think you deserve less than DAL, AA, UAL, FDX, UPS, SWA, and ALK").
Icing on the cake, for all labor groups, was the insulting profit sharing. The unilateral change to the profit sharing formula (for the 3rd time at JB), pssed off a ton of people. PS payouts for the last few years:
2015: 11%
2016: 16.35%
2017: 2.9%
2018: 0.2%
Talk about disincentivizing people, especially when the company is making a ton of money and peers are getting a lot more.
Not saying there aren't issues and btching everywhere, but I think this forum, and other JB forums, has more than other airlines due to the labor war management waged, mostly due to their fear of rising costs and their Wall St. overlords (and Joel P.). There is more to it than just sport btching. Former company guys/blue juicers have flipped to either apathetic or anti-company. That said, out on the line, there are plenty of happy people at JB. Attrition to other airlines isn't that high. People at JB, even the loudmouth complainers on forums, want the company to succeed but are frustrated by the wasted opportunity and the repeated shortcomings of the company (labor relations, operations, etc.).
Management at JB really needs handle the next round of negotiations better, fix profit sharing, invest money to fix the operation, staff appropriately in all departments, and do more than have BBQs and pizzas to try to fix the culture problem. Buying back $1.25bil in stock (to please Wall St) while taking PS away from frontline employees and while watching the operation crumble wasn't smart. It's misstep after misstep by management on the operation and labor sides. There is one overriding concern with management: the next earnings call...to the overall detriment of the company and its future (at least in the minds of many). Lots of people at JB, despite the forums, hope the operation and culture turn around and things turn out well. I personally hope for the best for JB and all the employees chugging along, and hope both the operation and labor/management relations get a lot better over the next few years.
Edit: I was reading this thread and thought it was a JB thread. There are issues everywhere, some just have more than others at times. Spirit ranks above American
Over the years there's been a continuous erosion of QOL/benefits thru many unilateral changes made by the company. There used to be a ton of anti-union guys at JB (hence why it took 3 votes to get a union on property), but JB in the last few years has managed to get 2 unions on property, with more coming. That should paint the management picture. The labor dispute with the pilots didn't help (with management basically saying "while we can afford to pay you guys industry leading pay, we think you deserve less than DAL, AA, UAL, FDX, UPS, SWA, and ALK").
Icing on the cake, for all labor groups, was the insulting profit sharing. The unilateral change to the profit sharing formula (for the 3rd time at JB), pssed off a ton of people. PS payouts for the last few years:
2015: 11%
2016: 16.35%
2017: 2.9%
2018: 0.2%
Talk about disincentivizing people, especially when the company is making a ton of money and peers are getting a lot more.
Not saying there aren't issues and btching everywhere, but I think this forum, and other JB forums, has more than other airlines due to the labor war management waged, mostly due to their fear of rising costs and their Wall St. overlords (and Joel P.). There is more to it than just sport btching. Former company guys/blue juicers have flipped to either apathetic or anti-company. That said, out on the line, there are plenty of happy people at JB. Attrition to other airlines isn't that high. People at JB, even the loudmouth complainers on forums, want the company to succeed but are frustrated by the wasted opportunity and the repeated shortcomings of the company (labor relations, operations, etc.).
Management at JB really needs handle the next round of negotiations better, fix profit sharing, invest money to fix the operation, staff appropriately in all departments, and do more than have BBQs and pizzas to try to fix the culture problem. Buying back $1.25bil in stock (to please Wall St) while taking PS away from frontline employees and while watching the operation crumble wasn't smart. It's misstep after misstep by management on the operation and labor sides. There is one overriding concern with management: the next earnings call...to the overall detriment of the company and its future (at least in the minds of many). Lots of people at JB, despite the forums, hope the operation and culture turn around and things turn out well. I personally hope for the best for JB and all the employees chugging along, and hope both the operation and labor/management relations get a lot better over the next few years.
Edit: I was reading this thread and thought it was a JB thread. There are issues everywhere, some just have more than others at times. Spirit ranks above American
#142
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.
#143
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 27
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.
You're kidding, right? Their response to the latest IROP was a direct violation of the CBA. They can't unilaterally offer premium open time. There are several section in the contract that are required to be implemented before this section was activated. This was agreed upon specifically so that sections that benefited the pilots weren't delayed while sections that were beneficial to the company were implemented earlier.
But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
#144
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
You're kidding, right? Their response to the latest IROP was a direct violation of the CBA. They can't unilaterally offer premium open time. There are several section in the contract that are required to be implemented before this section was activated. This was agreed upon specifically so that sections that benefited the pilots weren't delayed while sections that were beneficial to the company were implemented earlier.
But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
#145
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.
The company made a calculated decision that the grievance of this blatant violation will be better to deal with than a bunch of cancelations. Time will tell how it plays out. But allowing this violation to go uncontested would set a bad precedent in the "enforce the contract" phase, even if pilots benefited from it.
Last, in the CP email Mar 29th, he was clear that pairings will not be paid outside of CBA limitations. Crew services had been negotiating with pilots and making deals to fly flights/pairings for extra pay. Then when the pay doesn't show up, the pilots go to the chief pilots saying they had _____ deal with crew services and they aren't getting paid according to that deal.
"Chief Pilots will not be modifying pay to reflect any rates negotiated outside the CBA. If you are promised pay outside the CBA, we ask that you please make your Chief Pilot aware."
They couldn't be more clear. But then he turns around a few weeks later during an IROP and emails the pilot group saying they would pay everyone more to help out, outside the CBA?
Once everything else is implemented and the premium FCFS window happens, it will be fine and will be a good thing. And perhaps if the company wants 200% instead of the 150% that will exist with the premium FCFS window, they can negotiate for it next round of negotiations, or possibly in a side letter resulting from this grievance, or some other manner legal under the RLA.
Tl;dr: no, this isn't a good thing.
#146
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 556
Likes: 2
You're kidding, right? Their response to the latest IROP was a direct violation of the CBA. They can't unilaterally offer premium open time. There are several section in the contract that are required to be implemented before this section was activated. This was agreed upon specifically so that sections that benefited the pilots weren't delayed while sections that were beneficial to the company were implemented earlier.
But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
#147
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
#148
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
There better be a MEC grievance filed by close of business Monday.
#149
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
And just to continue the educational process, it would be interesting to know how SWA handles these situation!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



