Search

Notices

SWA or JB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-20-2019 | 07:55 PM
  #141  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 556
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
I could write a book about this, but I'll try to keep it short.

Over the years there's been a continuous erosion of QOL/benefits thru many unilateral changes made by the company. There used to be a ton of anti-union guys at JB (hence why it took 3 votes to get a union on property), but JB in the last few years has managed to get 2 unions on property, with more coming. That should paint the management picture. The labor dispute with the pilots didn't help (with management basically saying "while we can afford to pay you guys industry leading pay, we think you deserve less than DAL, AA, UAL, FDX, UPS, SWA, and ALK").

Icing on the cake, for all labor groups, was the insulting profit sharing. The unilateral change to the profit sharing formula (for the 3rd time at JB), pssed off a ton of people. PS payouts for the last few years:
2015: 11%
2016: 16.35%
2017: 2.9%
2018: 0.2%

Talk about disincentivizing people, especially when the company is making a ton of money and peers are getting a lot more.

Not saying there aren't issues and btching everywhere, but I think this forum, and other JB forums, has more than other airlines due to the labor war management waged, mostly due to their fear of rising costs and their Wall St. overlords (and Joel P.). There is more to it than just sport btching. Former company guys/blue juicers have flipped to either apathetic or anti-company. That said, out on the line, there are plenty of happy people at JB. Attrition to other airlines isn't that high. People at JB, even the loudmouth complainers on forums, want the company to succeed but are frustrated by the wasted opportunity and the repeated shortcomings of the company (labor relations, operations, etc.).

Management at JB really needs handle the next round of negotiations better, fix profit sharing, invest money to fix the operation, staff appropriately in all departments, and do more than have BBQs and pizzas to try to fix the culture problem. Buying back $1.25bil in stock (to please Wall St) while taking PS away from frontline employees and while watching the operation crumble wasn't smart. It's misstep after misstep by management on the operation and labor sides. There is one overriding concern with management: the next earnings call...to the overall detriment of the company and its future (at least in the minds of many). Lots of people at JB, despite the forums, hope the operation and culture turn around and things turn out well. I personally hope for the best for JB and all the employees chugging along, and hope both the operation and labor/management relations get a lot better over the next few years.

Edit: I was reading this thread and thought it was a JB thread. There are issues everywhere, some just have more than others at times. Spirit ranks above American
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:00 PM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.
That action was a blatant violation of the CBA, an end run around other contractual provisions that must be in place before they have the luxury of premium open time to alleviate their self-inflicted staffing woes.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:10 PM
  #143  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.

You're kidding, right? Their response to the latest IROP was a direct violation of the CBA. They can't unilaterally offer premium open time. There are several section in the contract that are required to be implemented before this section was activated. This was agreed upon specifically so that sections that benefited the pilots weren't delayed while sections that were beneficial to the company were implemented earlier.


But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:14 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
You're kidding, right? Their response to the latest IROP was a direct violation of the CBA. They can't unilaterally offer premium open time. There are several section in the contract that are required to be implemented before this section was activated. This was agreed upon specifically so that sections that benefited the pilots weren't delayed while sections that were beneficial to the company were implemented earlier.


But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
In some people's eyes the company can do no wrong. Just wander over to that juicefest facebook group.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:18 PM
  #145  
Covfefe
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
Great points: I might add, and some may not agree, but I thought the 200% incentive pay to fix this last IROP was a step in the right direction. Yes, there is still staffing, profit sharing, spares and many more other things to fix, but at least they put their money where there mouth was to get the operation moving. Haven't seen "holiday incentive pay" offered very often in the past to help recover operation. Baby steps.
Paying pilots more is usually a good thing. But the union negotiated for the premium first come, first served window to be NOT implemented until other parts of the contract ARE implemented. If the company can just offer premium pay whenever it wants, outside of the limits of the mutually agreed upon CBA, it has NO incentive to speed up implementation of the other sections that pilots will benefit from. Furthermore, it agreed to the implementation timeline, then when they needed it sooner, they did it anyway knowing they weren't allowed to.

The company made a calculated decision that the grievance of this blatant violation will be better to deal with than a bunch of cancelations. Time will tell how it plays out. But allowing this violation to go uncontested would set a bad precedent in the "enforce the contract" phase, even if pilots benefited from it.

Last, in the CP email Mar 29th, he was clear that pairings will not be paid outside of CBA limitations. Crew services had been negotiating with pilots and making deals to fly flights/pairings for extra pay. Then when the pay doesn't show up, the pilots go to the chief pilots saying they had _____ deal with crew services and they aren't getting paid according to that deal.

"Chief Pilots will not be modifying pay to reflect any rates negotiated outside the CBA. If you are promised pay outside the CBA, we ask that you please make your Chief Pilot aware."

They couldn't be more clear. But then he turns around a few weeks later during an IROP and emails the pilot group saying they would pay everyone more to help out, outside the CBA?

Once everything else is implemented and the premium FCFS window happens, it will be fine and will be a good thing. And perhaps if the company wants 200% instead of the 150% that will exist with the premium FCFS window, they can negotiate for it next round of negotiations, or possibly in a side letter resulting from this grievance, or some other manner legal under the RLA.

Tl;dr: no, this isn't a good thing.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:36 PM
  #146  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 556
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
You're kidding, right? Their response to the latest IROP was a direct violation of the CBA. They can't unilaterally offer premium open time. There are several section in the contract that are required to be implemented before this section was activated. This was agreed upon specifically so that sections that benefited the pilots weren't delayed while sections that were beneficial to the company were implemented earlier.


But hey. Double pay, AMIRIGHT??!!
My bad: Clearly not educated enough on the CBA. Just tried to say something positive, but clearly need to go read the contract. Thank you all for correcting me.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 08:40 PM
  #147  
Covfefe
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
My bad: Clearly not educated enough on the CBA. Just tried to say something positive, but clearly need to go read the contract. Thank you all for correcting me.
It's all good, that's why these forums exist. Knowledge is power.
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 09:59 PM
  #148  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Clear Right
My bad: Clearly not educated enough on the CBA. Just tried to say something positive, but clearly need to go read the contract. Thank you all for correcting me.
I’m guessing you voted on the contract without really knowing and understanding it. Seems widespread with blewjet pilots. It’s not like this is some obscure thing tucked away in the depths of the hostage/internment section. It’s been plastered on numerous emails and highlighted(literally) in the CBA . It’s basically the largest carrot to get the company to implement the rest of the contract ASAP.

There better be a MEC grievance filed by close of business Monday.
Reply
Old 04-21-2019 | 01:44 AM
  #149  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by disenchantMINT
That action was a blatant violation of the CBA, an end run around other contractual provisions that must be in place before they have the luxury of premium open time to alleviate their self-inflicted staffing woes.
And just to continue the educational process, it would be interesting to know how SWA handles these situation!
Reply
Old 04-21-2019 | 04:35 AM
  #150  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by donpizmeov2
And just to continue the educational process, it would be interesting to know how SWA handles these situation!
Properly staffing the airline.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Southwest
10
06-25-2012 10:03 PM
MatthewAMEL
Southwest
120
11-28-2011 10:26 AM
Sr. Barco
Southwest
44
10-12-2011 07:39 PM
Metal121
Major
20
02-04-2008 08:31 PM
SWAjet
Major
44
01-19-2006 12:21 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices