BOSTON 190/220/320 flying
10-12-2022 | 01:27 PM
#81
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 22
Why do I get the feeling that as usual the company is going to have the train wreck that usually happens when they do…well…really anything in that they are going to send 190s to the beer can factory and the 220s will be delayed again?
10-12-2022 | 02:07 PM
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 53
Still only 12 A220’s and 1 of them is parked.
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/JetBlue-Airways
the 220’s are very delayed
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/JetBlue-Airways
the 220’s are very delayed
10-12-2022 | 03:22 PM
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Still only 12 A220’s and 1 of them is parked.
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/JetBlue-Airways
the 220’s are very delayed
https://www.planespotters.net/airline/JetBlue-Airways
the 220’s are very delayed
10-12-2022 | 05:21 PM
#85
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 37
1. How many currently out of service?
2. Yes, most of them are flying right now, as are most of the E190s. So if you start parking more E190s without taking more A220s, from this point, then block hours/ASMs will shrink.
If you're already flying all the current A220s, and all the current E190s, you can't park a bunch of E190s and only take a few more A220s without reducing the schedule.
2. Yes, most of them are flying right now, as are most of the E190s. So if you start parking more E190s without taking more A220s, from this point, then block hours/ASMs will shrink.
If you're already flying all the current A220s, and all the current E190s, you can't park a bunch of E190s and only take a few more A220s without reducing the schedule.
Also as much as the 220s are delayed, we will probably get 1 or 2 more by the end of the year.
10-12-2022 | 06:25 PM
#87
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 22
Don’t they still have an altitude limitation for something to do with engines? I know the thing is ridiculously efficient but that’s got to hurt its viability in the way they intended it to be used at least somewhat.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
10-12-2022 | 06:44 PM
#88
The REAL Bluedriver
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Don’t they still have an altitude limitation for something to do with engines? I know the thing is ridiculously efficient but that’s got to hurt its viability in the way they intended it to be used at least somewhat.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
10-12-2022 | 06:59 PM
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 12
Don’t they still have an altitude limitation for something to do with engines? I know the thing is ridiculously efficient but that’s got to hurt its viability in the way they intended it to be used at least somewhat.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
BTW if you haven’t rode on one yet, just prey you aren’t 20 in line to take off, those fkn engines are annoying as hell every time they come out of idle.
Not at the moment. I think Swiss was having some engine issues and needed a software update a few years ago. Altitude limitation is 41,000ft.
10-13-2022 | 03:07 AM
#90
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Airline Employee
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
