LOA17 is out
03-24-2022 | 08:32 AM
#191
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
The MEC and NC are saying that LOA 17 gives us “increased protections” and “additional restrictions imposed upon the NEA which the company is obligated…”
If LOA 17 gives ALPA more control over the NEA, and LOA 17 gives pilots a raise and a $30 million payout, then what’s the other side of LOA 17? What’s in it for the company? How does the company benefit? Crickets…
If LOA 17 gives ALPA more control over the NEA, and LOA 17 gives pilots a raise and a $30 million payout, then what’s the other side of LOA 17? What’s in it for the company? How does the company benefit? Crickets…
03-24-2022 | 10:43 AM
#194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 14
From: blueJet
03-24-2022 | 10:49 AM
#195
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
They are only getting that additional $150+m (just in the 1st year of this NEA no less) with the initial enablement of LOA 12 (with no pilot input) and now they hope to put the issue to bed with a yes vote on this LOA 17 for a one time $30m and “change”. Sorry that’s a NO! They have much more to fear from arbitration than us pilots as any cease and desist order would immediately force the company to actually play ball with a serious offering to the pilot group unless they want to walk away from such an enormous incremental revenue stream! How bout 10% of the incremental revenue stream annually to be distributed to the pilots for the life of the agreement because it was ultimately only made possible by us providing relief to key sections of our CBA at a critical period for the company…. That would be a starting point!
Last edited by Desdi; 03-24-2022 at 11:21 AM.
03-24-2022 | 11:54 AM
#196
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
The MEC and NC are saying that LOA 17 gives us “increased protections” and “additional restrictions imposed upon the NEA which the company is obligated…”
If LOA 17 gives ALPA more control over the NEA, and LOA 17 gives pilots a raise and a $30 million payout, then what’s the other side of LOA 17? What’s in it for the company? How does the company benefit? Crickets…
If LOA 17 gives ALPA more control over the NEA, and LOA 17 gives pilots a raise and a $30 million payout, then what’s the other side of LOA 17? What’s in it for the company? How does the company benefit? Crickets…
03-24-2022 | 12:55 PM
#197
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,611
Likes: 14
From: blueJet
How can they say this with a straight face? The protections are not greater than original scope protections for JetBlue pilots, the intent of scope, no? They have some restriction metrics which never acknowledge the company’s complete lack of respect for previous language written and give no greater leverage to remedy future violations. This is shiite and must be dealt with as such, flushed.
Then again, we could vote down the 3% just like we voted down the 2%, and the arbitrator could uphold the grievance and order the company to cease the hub-hub and hub-intl flying on AA.
Then we’d really be negotiating from a position of strength. I bet the MEC would settle for 4% and come back to us for ratification. Win Win.
03-24-2022 | 02:37 PM
#199
Thread Starter
Covfefe
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
He was voted in for another term before enough of the LEC turnover occurred (looking at you BOS mafia). The clowns in BOS who are no longer reps STILL think it was a mistake for the last LOA to get voted down, even with hindsight. The new BOS guys are better from what I hear. But the Chris Kenney re-election was their parting gift before their terms ended.
03-24-2022 | 02:39 PM
#200
New Hire
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Check out the 2021 Proxy Statement. Proposal about compensation of executive officers. Voted on and passed.
