Search

Notices

TA Reached

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2022 | 07:36 PM
  #201  
Some Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 329
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by I was inverted
B6 pilots have tons of leverage right now. They can’t fill classes. People are leaving in droves. Pattern bargaining means you go with the trend, not leapfrog behind..especially when nothing else in the QOL section is getting fixed. B6 pilots need to stop leapfrogging behind others and riding their coattails. Sometimes it takes walking away and picketing and pulling other levers to get a deal. B6ALPA consistently settles for less. Profit sharing is industry standard. It used to exist until the CBA. B6 has a 50% larger pilot group than Alaska, and now makes less than they do with their profit sharing/incentive plan. B6ALPA will always “get ‘em next time.” Well what if next time doesn’t have the same leverage? Legacies are going to hire a ton in the next 2-3 years. Every young person they hire makes the math worse for someone to leave jetblue. Once it’s no longer the front side of a hiring wave, it’s less attractive to make a move. Then jetblue can drag it out. JCBA/single operating certificate/etc…the union thinks that’s the real leverage. Leverage exists now. And it was used for getting less than Alaska? Yeah…sure they will get ‘em next time.
Originally Posted by KNOTAPILOT
The issue is that there’s always a reason to push fighting for profit sharing down the line. When there’s a recession and we are negotiating a JCBA there’ll be a reason why it doesn’t matter to do so. You’re new still. Ask the next few captains you fly with how much they used to get paid in profit sharing. We weren’t Delta then either.
I appreciate the responses. I was just genuinely curious. Not many people, theres been a few, over on the potato farm have gone in depth as to why or really explained there reasoning. It was just a no PS no vote F the company. I'm keeping an open mind so I was just looking for more in depth since I am still new. I've been picking the minds of the captains I've flown with trying to gather knowledge about B6 going back years. Thats why I came to here because the farm right now just doesn't go in depth as to reasoning. I appreciate you both taking the time to respond. I am looking forward to reading and getting other's people opinions prior to the vote opening so I can learn more.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 07:46 PM
  #202  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 215
Likes: 11
Default

Originally Posted by RJDriver900
I appreciate the responses. I was just genuinely curious. Not many people, theres been a few, over on the potato farm have gone in depth as to why or really explained there reasoning. It was just a no PS no vote F the company. I'm keeping an open mind so I was just looking for more in depth since I am still new. I've been picking the minds of the captains I've flown with trying to gather knowledge about B6 going back years. Thats why I came to here because the farm right now just doesn't go in depth as to reasoning. I appreciate you both taking the time to respond. I am looking forward to reading and getting other's people opinions prior to the vote opening so I can learn more.
You got a good attitude. Honestly sometimes you have to see through the anger some people respond with. They may or may not have a point. I think it passes easily and I can see why. It’s not as awful as I expected to be fair. It’s a little disheartening that we as a group have settled for less. For me I just don’t want that to be a trend and this isn’t industry leading by any means. Snap up to average is average not leading. Also all those companies have the PS we don’t. Is it better sure, is it leading? How many times do you run a race trying to come in number 4/5?
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 07:46 PM
  #203  
IAFDOF's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Airline Employee
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
Now as for the rest. Let’s avoid your snark. It’s about perspective. You were not here to see a good sized PS check and the next thing you know the company changed the way we got ps and said well everyone would like a higher hourly rate anyway. So for some of us we would like what they took back. They union also said they wanted PS. I simply do not share your confidence that we will get it in the JCBA. One chance gone one left. We will see.
So, real question. If you know for a fact that the company is like “absolutely no way!!” to PS; then what is the no vote? If you know they absolutely wont even consider it, then it seems to me that the “no” isnt just to send it back for more negotiations, it’s pure spite. Please don’t vote out of spite!

I’m sure PS is great. I want PS in the JCBA;
you deserve to have it back. You can believe me or not, but it’s true. This time around, my personal line in the sand was 20% at my payband. They exceeded it; barely. For the JCBA PS will be a line in the sand for me. Right now, though, 20% moves buying a house, for example, up a couple years. I can’t justify a no vote with an absolutely unknown timeline for another opportunity at a solid raise before the JCBA.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 07:49 PM
  #204  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 671
Likes: 104
Default

Originally Posted by IAFDOF
So, real question. If you know for a fact that the company is like “absolutely no way!!” to PS; then what is the no vote? If you know they absolutely wont even consider it, then it seems to me that the “no” isnt just to send it back for more negotiations, it’s pure spite. Please don’t vote out of spite!

I’m sure PS is great. I want PS in the JCBA;
you deserve to have it back. You can believe me or not, but it’s true. This time around, my personal line in the sand was 20% at my payband. They exceeded it; barely. For the JCBA PS will be a line in the sand for me.
Thanks for your support in furthering our profession and raising the bar.

To the 15% that vote no, Godspeed
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 07:54 PM
  #205  
New Hire
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IAFDOF
So, real question. If you know for a fact that the company is like “absolutely no way!!” to PS; then what is the no vote? If you know they absolutely wont even consider it, then it seems to me that the “no” isnt just to send it back for more negotiations, it’s pure spite. Please don’t vote out of spite!

I’m sure PS is great. I want PS in the JCBA;
you deserve to have it back. You can believe me or not, but it’s true. This time around, my personal line in the sand was 20% at my payband. They exceeded it; barely. For the JCBA PS will be a line in the sand for me.
It is not out of spite! The company needs an agreement that will allow them to stem the tide with regards to pilot recruiting and retention problems. A no vote denies them that. The pressure will only increase as more of our peers secure better compensation and we continue to flounder. That is what achieves actual meaningful gains, and sometimes that takes some intestinal fortitude and willingness to forego short-term minimal gain in favor of a more long-term and substantial future win. It’s not rocket science. But the JetBlue pilot group historically has been unwilling to accept this reality.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:01 PM
  #206  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 472
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by IAFDOF
So, real question. If you know for a fact that the company is like “absolutely no way!!” to PS; then what is the no vote? If you know they absolutely wont even consider it, then it seems to me that the “no” isnt just to send it back for more negotiations, it’s pure spite. Please don’t vote out of spite!

I’m sure PS is great. I want PS in the JCBA;
you deserve to have it back. You can believe me or not, but it’s true. This time around, my personal line in the sand was 20% at my payband. They exceeded it; barely. For the JCBA PS will be a line in the sand for me. Right now, though, 20% moves buying a house, for example, up a couple years. I can’t justify a no vote with an absolutely unknown timeline for another opportunity at a solid raise before the JCBA.
We’ll get ‘em next time! Oh, and why does the company get to put a PS line in the sand but 4,700 pilots, the ones with a whole lot more leverage than the company has, don’t put their own line in the sand for it? Let’s play a game called fill in the blank. Because the pilot group and union have a “low self-w____.”

Even if Alaska weren’t profitable, with their performance incentive plan plus their rates and their higher ADG, they are compensated better than B6 would be under this TA. B6 pilot group is 50% larger than AS pilot group. AS was the first in the chute. They didn’t have the delta agreement to use. They also made gains in many other areas. Why is it acceptable that B6 makes no gains in any areas, and still falls short overall in comp of even Alaska, let alone delta, especially when you include their profit sharing. Completely unacceptable agreement.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:04 PM
  #207  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 55
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by IAFDOF
So, real question. If you know for a fact that the company is like “absolutely no way!!” to PS; then what is the no vote? If you know they absolutely wont even consider it, then it seems to me that the “no” isnt just to send it back for more negotiations, it’s pure spite. Please don’t vote out of spite!

I’m sure PS is great. I want PS in the JCBA;
you deserve to have it back. You can believe me or not, but it’s true. This time around, my personal line in the sand was 20% at my payband. They exceeded it; barely. For the JCBA PS will be a line in the sand for me. Right now, though, 20% moves buying a house, for example, up a couple years. I can’t justify a no vote with an absolutely unknown timeline for another opportunity at a solid raise before the JCBA.
They said they were a no way but we didn’t get to a labor dispute over Christmas did we? (Not in a rude way) It’s not all spite it’s also the fact that PS is industry standard now we should have it.

We had a chance to push harder we didnt. Apparently we are saving that for the JCBA i remain skeptical
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:09 PM
  #208  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 436
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by IAFDOF
So, real question. If you know for a fact that the company is like “absolutely no way!!” to PS; then what is the no vote? If you know they absolutely wont even consider it, then it seems to me that the “no” isnt just to send it back for more negotiations, it’s pure spite. Please don’t vote out of spite!

I’m sure PS is great. I want PS in the JCBA;
you deserve to have it back. You can believe me or not, but it’s true. This time around, my personal line in the sand was 20% at my payband. They exceeded it; barely. For the JCBA PS will be a line in the sand for me. Right now, though, 20% moves buying a house, for example, up a couple years. I can’t afford a no vote with an absolutely unknown timeline for another opportunity at a solid raise before the JCBA.

If you think we are getting profit sharing once we have merged with a group of self described "discount pilots" I've got a bridge to sell you.

People fund years of retirement, down payments on investment properties, yachts and planes in cash from just ONE YEAR of profit sharing at DAL. $50,000 checks were cut. It has ZERO to do with size and everything to do with profit created per pilot. At the same time as DAL was cutting $50,000 PS checks to its pilots, jetblue was buying back enough stock to write a $500,000 check to each pilot just to put it into perspective. Our management is greedy, they dont value your contributions, and thats why they fight PS when they probably wouldnt need to pay it for years while we merge. Just remember that when thry ask you to go above for them. Any extra revenue or profit your extra work generates goes to them, and they wont share a penny with you.

Im obviously a hard no, but our group is willingly ignorant about how badly we are trailing and this will pass. If we gave away scope for free this crap samdwich is gonna be a slam dunk.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:10 PM
  #209  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 7
Default

So we’re a few months behind DL, catch them briefly next year, then end up at $340 while they’re at $350. They have profit sharing, but I’d prefer our scope. The snap up sounds good (probably the most important). I’m satisfied.
Reply
Old 12-15-2022 | 08:13 PM
  #210  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 38
Default

Some of you say “Definitely PS next time”. Wait and see when you have to choose between big JCBA improvements or send it back because it didn’t include PS. I wonder what will be your choice then. Haha, its always the same.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shortfall2105
FedEx
5
08-01-2017 06:56 AM
Elvis90
Major
0
01-20-2012 01:56 PM
FlightPhoenix
Cargo
1
01-21-2009 11:00 AM
Sir James
Major
1
08-23-2007 01:59 PM
FlyByWire
Major
10
03-03-2006 06:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices