![]() |
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3570323)
Yes they negotiated a full contract Bluedriver, so we’re gonna be lacking in ADG and other areas. These are all things we’d still be negotiating in Section 6, which undoubtedly would take another year or possibly 2 if there wasn’t a merger on the horizon. The union decided to zero in on rates and achieve them quickly. As a mid level Airbus FO, it helped fix our slope and gives me a substantial raise. You are correct though Blue, the lack of PS immediacy impacts us. Thing is, we aren’t turning a profit, and the company seems h3ll bent on not giving it up currently. I’ve made the personal decision that I can live with that for this short term, but I’ve told my reps they had better start telling Robin to warm up to PS sooner than later because I’m going to die on that hill come JCBA.
The reps agree. |
I’m done debating this piece of garbage though. It’s moot. It still passes with between 80-85% yes imo. And, mark my words, B6ALPA wont get ‘em next time. There will be a sales campaign to pass a turd JCBA, likely with no PS, just trying to play catch up to legacy rates and 401k. And I look forward to eating crow if I’m wrong.
|
Originally Posted by Desdi
(Post 3570411)
One small bone of contention and I don’t know how long you’ve been here but all of us who were here for TA 1 we were all quite forcefully told from our NC and Union you can forget about restoring PS while the company is profitable, the ONLY time we would ever have a chance in hell would be during a time of low or negative profitably and we should wait until then. They said no pilot group gained appreciable PS while the said airline was making money. Fast forward when you and I are going to the roadshows for our JCBA and I betcha that’ll be exactly what they will tell us. They will also say “if there was any hope for PS it was during the Jan 23 contract extension, or LOA 17…. But that ship has sailed so we need to move forward because we can’t fix that now”…. I can hear it all now.
|
Originally Posted by Desdi
(Post 3570411)
One small bone of contention and I don’t know how long you’ve been here but all of us who were here for TA 1 we were all quite forcefully told from our NC and Union you can forget about restoring PS while the company is profitable, the ONLY time we would ever have a chance in hell would be during a time of low or negative profitably and we should wait until then. They said no pilot group gained appreciable PS while the said airline was making money. Fast forward when you and I are going to the roadshows for our JCBA and I betcha that’ll be exactly what they will tell us. They will also say “if there was any hope for PS it was during the Jan 23 contract extension, or LOA 17…. But that ship has sailed so we need to move forward because we can’t fix that now”…. I can hear it all now.
|
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3570412)
I’m done debating this piece of garbage though. It’s moot. It still passes with between 80-85% yes imo. And, mark my words, B6ALPA wont get ‘em next time. There will be a sales campaign to pass a turd JCBA, likely with no PS, just trying to play catch up to legacy rates and 401k. And I look forward to eating crow if I’m wrong.
|
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
(Post 3570400)
Absolutely brutal.
good grief if that’s true why would it be better for the JCBA? |
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3570457)
You’re correct, debating is futile at this point. 80-85% yes would indicate that it’s not garbage, but I digress. It did, however, fail to deliver PS. One other thing worth noting: not enough pilots are placing enough value on profit sharing (straight from our reps). Either they don’t know about it or don’t understand it. That needs to change, which is incumbent on the MEC to educate. If the JCBA falls short, I’ll be right there with you to recall everyone associated with it.
|
Originally Posted by pilotpayne
(Post 3570459)
good grief if that’s true why would it be better for the JCBA?
If they properly educated the pilot group, it would make their negotiating job against the company a lot harder. Negotiating to be 6/6 with no profit sharing is a relatively easy task for ALPA. They (and National) get their cut in a timely manner and avoid a labor dispute, and their cut of incremental gains achieved by going back to the table are a rounding error to them. Reps don’t want to be recalled, so they sell sell sell. The pilots erroneously think they got a great deal and 80% are happy. Management ultimately has the lowest labor costs in the peer group while getting just enough to get people in the door, so they are happy. Win/win/win. And B6 pilots will continue to ride the coattails of real majors in perpetuity, picking up some scraps along the way, while telling their buddies and each other how good their steak dinner is. |
Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
(Post 3570343)
Do the math and then educate me on what I’m leaving on the table. What % PS are you going to negotiate and for how long? If the company even budges on that. Just to start negotiating again one year from now. Like I said, don’t think for a second that this company won’t tell us to pound sand, pull the offer, and go lean until the JCBA. That is absolutely a possibility. Then what? You sure showed them didn’t you. Or, who knows, maybe we get a little more out of this. But when? There’s a point where we start leaving money on the table. My opinion is just that, an opinion based on all the information I’ve gathered. I suggest you guys do the same and vote accordingly.
|
Originally Posted by I was inverted
(Post 3570412)
And, mark my words, B6ALPA wont get ‘em next time. There will be a sales campaign to pass a turd JCBA, likely with no PS, just trying to play catch up to legacy rates and 401k. And I look forward to eating crow if I’m wrong.
Carry on. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands