Search
Notices

In the courtroom.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2023, 09:17 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 146
Default

Originally Posted by Tornado875 View Post
Eh so far they are really both saying different things as they have been the entire time. So far DOJs entire argument is "Look your honor, who cares about the industry as a whole and the big picture, if even one person doesn't have the ability to get on a flight paid for by a stimulus check, and if they do not have the ability to fist fight the gate agent then this whole merger should be shot down!"

And B6 is saying "Shhh pay no attention to the white claw drinkers who will be unable to get on a flight for 17$, look at the industry as a whole".

Essentially an apple to oranges argument. Most of the DOJs energy seemed to be spent on looking at the Spirit CEOS comments from the previous years so far. I would say B6 is winning, but its hard to say from a tweet summary lol.

To preface this, I am a dumb uneducated airbus driver who knows absolutely nothing about the law so please feel free to completely ignore me, or to tell me to shut up.

Unfortunately no play by play summary today, which I was really enjoying.
SHUT UP!

no reason - but you said someone could tell you so I thought I would jump on the opportunity. Haha

really tho - I agree - the tweets have been at least entertaining. Guess we all need to do a healing dance so David can feel better and return tomorrow.

Side note - a friend of mine and I were talking about David’s lack of presence in the quart room today due to being sick. My friend says, suspicious, doesn’t he have a T? Maybe the DOJ put him under house arrest so he couldn’t report on their silly points that they are making. 😂 let tue conspiracy theories begin.
Born2FlyAv8R is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 09:51 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2022
Posts: 217
Default

Originally Posted by Born2FlyAv8R View Post
SHUT UP!

no reason - but you said someone could tell you so I thought I would jump on the opportunity. Haha

really tho - I agree - the tweets have been at least entertaining. Guess we all need to do a healing dance so David can feel better and return tomorrow.

Side note - a friend of mine and I were talking about David’s lack of presence in the quart room today due to being sick. My friend says, suspicious, doesn’t he have a T? Maybe the DOJ put him under house arrest so he couldn’t report on their silly points that they are making. 😂 let tue conspiracy theories begin.
If only he had gotten the 9th booster shot, then he could've been healthy.
Tornado875 is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 09:58 AM
  #23  
That/It/Thang
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,848
Default

Originally Posted by Tornado875 View Post
Eh so far they are really both saying different things as they have been the entire time. So far DOJs entire argument is "Look your honor, who cares about the industry as a whole and the big picture, if even one person doesn't have the ability to get on a flight paid for by a stimulus check, and if they do not have the ability to fist fight the gate agent then this whole merger should be shot down!"

And B6 is saying "Shhh pay no attention to the white claw drinkers who will be unable to get on a flight for 17$, look at the industry as a whole".

Essentially an apple to oranges argument. Most of the DOJs energy seemed to be spent on looking at the Spirit CEOS comments from the previous years so far. I would say B6 is winning, but its hard to say from a tweet summary lol.

To preface this, I am a dumb uneducated airbus driver who knows absolutely nothing about the law so please feel free to completely ignore me, or to tell me to shut up.

Unfortunately no play by play summary today, which I was really enjoying.
Ted did I good job, I think, explaining the process and why he was “against the merger,” before being “for it,” without stating the obvious “I was getting paid more by Frontier at the time.”

The NEA helps his argument by saying “yes, I thought it was a hard battle for DOJ approval when there was still an NEA in play, that’s gone now”.
CincoDeMayo is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 10:15 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Default

Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo View Post
Ted did I good job, I think, explaining the process and why he was “against the merger,” before being “for it,” without stating the obvious “I was getting paid more by Frontier at the time.”

The NEA helps his argument by saying “yes, I thought it was a hard battle for DOJ approval when there was still an NEA in play, that’s gone now”.
Ted’s a smooth talker, the summary didn’t seem like the DOJ really hit with the gotcha moment that ‘even Spirit was against the deal originally’ which they focused on in their complaint.

I think at this point it comes down to which side better lays out the financials and market impacts of the three possible scenarios: the airlines don’t merger, they merge and become a successful legacy competitor, or they merge and are ineffectual while leaving a gap in the ULCC market.
RemoveB4flght is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 11:30 AM
  #25  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Originally Posted by Born2FlyAv8R View Post

Side note - a friend of mine and I were talking about David’s lack of presence in the quart room today due to being sick. My friend says, suspicious, doesn’t he have a T? Maybe the DOJ put him under house arrest so he couldn’t report on their silly points that they are making. 😂 let tue conspiracy theories begin.
I was thinking JB told him to stay away because today they would roll out their 2027 combined network plan and potential focus city map. Can’t have that leaking to the plebs on Twitter.
Flyby1206 is online now  
Old 11-02-2023, 12:11 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ed Force One's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 707
Default

Real journalists aren't allowed to report, but somehow a blogger is tweeting out a play by play blatantly under his own name?

My speculation - I doubt he'll be back. That's not conspiracy thinking at all. He broke the rules, got caught and got asked to leave. I'm surprised he did it for 2 days, tbh. That being said, I appreciated the fact that he did it, but we all can agree that it was against the rules.
Ed Force One is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 12:25 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,160
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Force One View Post
Real journalists aren't allowed to report, but somehow a blogger is tweeting out a play by play blatantly under his own name?

My speculation - I doubt he'll be back. That's not conspiracy thinking at all. He broke the rules, got caught and got asked to leave. I'm surprised he did it for 2 days, tbh. That being said, I appreciated the fact that he did it, but we all can agree that it was against the rules.
Against the rules? B6 and NK wanted a closed court but the judge denied that and said it would be public. https://www.law360.com/articles/1737...ntitrust-trial

Rules vary considerably on tweeting a court case. Where did you see that it was against the rules to tweet it out?
Andy is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 12:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 235
Default

Something is up... 3 people that I saw tweeting about the case the first 2 days are all not present today. The whole sick things seems fishy to me as well, and I wouldnt be surprised if this is it.
DrSmacFum is online now  
Old 11-02-2023, 12:37 PM
  #29  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum View Post
Something is up... 3 people that I saw tweeting about the case the first 2 days are all not present today. The whole sick things seems fishy to me as well, and I wouldnt be surprised if this is it.
maybe they all ate the fish?
Razzledazzle is offline  
Old 11-02-2023, 12:48 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 146
Default

Originally Posted by DrSmacFum View Post
Something is up... 3 people that I saw tweeting about the case the first 2 days are all not present today. The whole sick things seems fishy to me as well, and I wouldnt be surprised if this is it.
I would agree with your sentiment, except William McGee, who just so happens to be totally against this merger, or apparently, against any merger, is still in the court room also tweeting. However, he is not tweeting nearly as much as David was, and he is only tweeting things that lean towards the DOJS case. Now THATS sus!
Born2FlyAv8R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halon1211
Spirit
287
01-31-2024 05:28 PM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
JetJock16
Major
334
01-25-2010 06:58 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
165
09-01-2006 04:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices