Search

Notices

System bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2025 | 10:27 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
Not disputing your opinion but on the earnings call JG stated we are “appropriately staffed”. Historically, jetblue has not been phased by turn over despite the added costs it brings. Do not mistake your own personal value with the opinion of management.

Also, management stated the XLR’s represent a 3rd fleet type at this point and they aren’t willing to take on that burden hence the sale. Low single digits of growth the next few years largely with returning AOG’s which will not add additional costs as they are already owned. Management is banking on the continued decline of ULCC’s as well. That little nugget of information, IMHO, will be the single biggest factor on whether the BOD sells the airline or not.
Appropriately staffed for the 700 flights a day average for most of the year maybe. When we plussed up to our current levels we were doing 1000 a day. There's a reason they've been begging for VILs every month. So I'd say "yes and no" as a response to her comment. I still think the company was waiting to see how the summer went before deciding on the next move. I don't think summer is going swimmingly (Pun intended). I'm buying my popcorn to pop to watch and see what they do this Fall.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 10:29 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
I think this is the right take. Nothing is going to happen until the fate of NK is resolved because there are too many unknowns. My contrary take to a merger is that if UA sees the value in B6 as JFK, then is the FAA/DOJ/DOT going to allow UAL to dominate NYC with EWR and JFK or will they require much divestiture so that it effectively neuters a deal.
I'm pretty sure that there is precedent set by the DOJ/DOT itself that stated EWR is a separate market than NYC proper. If that holds, UA could keep EWR and still gain a foothold in JFK without any major setbacks.
Reply
Old 07-31-2025 | 05:02 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 84
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
I'm pretty sure that there is precedent set by the DOJ/DOT itself that stated EWR is a separate market than NYC proper. If that holds, UA could keep EWR and still gain a foothold in JFK without any major setbacks.
DAL dominates LGA and JFK. UAL dominates EWR and has nothing in JFK and relatively nothing in LGA.

its hard to make the argument, except for optics, that UAL would have to give up much considering the presence they have in the “NYC” market.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DeadStick
Delta
158
12-04-2022 12:23 PM
EWR73FO
United
67
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
23
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices