Search

Notices

Merger? Anyone Anyone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2026 | 01:04 PM
  #141  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Default

They do have about 90 or so in the pool from the gateway programs on standby ready to go
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 02:47 PM
  #142  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Bgood
As you said, rolling 365 days. And that's all that matters. Beyond that doesn't count. I wouldn't be surprised if we are not compliant now. But getting into compliance by the chosen effective date of a codeshare is quite possible. The block hrs will easily become compliant this year, and they control when they're ready to hire again.
We're still not hiring so the chance of that happening any time soon is probably remote. And we've been told several times we're over staffed still. So any hiring would most likely just be to stem losing numbers, not increase to higher than previous year/s.

Not sure this one gets satisfied unless they make major changes to their orders and hiring stance.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 03:16 PM
  #143  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 69
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
We're still not hiring so the chance of that happening any time soon is probably remote. And we've been told several times we're over staffed still. So any hiring would most likely just be to stem losing numbers, not increase to higher than previous year/s.

Not sure this one gets satisfied unless they make major changes to their orders and hiring stance.
I think the staffing model is in flux. Jetblue believes the traditional reserve model is inadequate for its needs. Flight ops seems to think they can manage open time with RSA/VDA. The guy thats negotiating the contract and seem to be VP of Flops right had guy has mentioned it a few times at recurrent.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 03:20 PM
  #144  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
We're still not hiring so the chance of that happening any time soon is probably remote. And we've been told several times we're over staffed still. So any hiring would most likely just be to stem losing numbers, not increase to higher than previous year/s.

Not sure this one gets satisfied unless they make major changes to their orders and hiring stance.
I agree, and that's just it. They have the option to do that at their own will IF they want to entertain a codeshare with UAL. So the ball is in their court. I'm not saying it will happen, but when it comes to CBA restrictions, they have the option. Just hire (if they believe the codeshare is worth it getting a net 1 pilot).

And they dont need to change fleet orders, only hiring stance. A220s are still coming(14 hulls, net growth relative to 365 days ago from [insert codeshare effective date here]) Also, 321neos, affected by the GTF problem, will be coming back online, potentially increasing block hours further.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 04:07 PM
  #145  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
I think the staffing model is in flux. Jetblue believes the traditional reserve model is inadequate for its needs. Flight ops seems to think they can manage open time with RSA/VDA. The guy thats negotiating the contract and seem to be VP of Flops right had guy has mentioned it a few times at recurrent.
Could be. I actually agree in part. There should be no SCR. Assign all next day trips during the DRO to LCR. Anything that pops into OT after that goes Prem. Then VDA. They'll get trips covered. Maybe they pay more Prem/VDA but save on additional pilots.

Either way, both avenues lead to delayed hiring, so a long ways away from CBA compliance.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 04:19 PM
  #146  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,057
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
I think the staffing model is in flux. Jetblue believes the traditional reserve model is inadequate for its needs. Flight ops seems to think they can manage open time with RSA/VDA. The guy thats negotiating the contract and seem to be VP of Flops right had guy has mentioned it a few times at recurrent.
Truly comical. Just when you think JB has learned that square wheels won't work they surprise you with a doozy.

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
Could be. I actually agree in part. There should be no SCR. Assign all next day trips during the DRO to LCR. Anything that pops into OT after that goes Prem. Then VDA. They'll get trips covered. Maybe they pay more Prem/VDA but save on additional pilots.

Either way, both avenues lead to delayed hiring, so a long ways away from CBA compliance.
​​​​​​​
The rumor I heard was they wanted to get rid of RSV staffing completely. Schedule everyone for min sked each month and rely on VDA to cover any open trips that didnt get picked up.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 05:49 PM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,709
Likes: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206

The rumor I heard was they wanted to get rid of RSV staffing completely. Schedule everyone for min sked each month and rely on VDA to cover any open trips that didnt get picked up.

Lifer rsv by choice.
this would suck so bad.


Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 10:31 PM
  #148  
Bluediver the REAL deal
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 583
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Lifer rsv by choice.
this would suck so bad.
They certainly don’t like paying people to sit. Unfortunately they don’t believe that me making myself available for them to use is acceptable. I’m on board with you.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 03:37 AM
  #149  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 519
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206
Truly comical. Just when you think JB has learned that square wheels won't work they surprise you with a doozy.



The rumor I heard was they wanted to get rid of RSV staffing completely. Schedule everyone for min sked each month and rely on VDA to cover any open trips that didnt get picked up.

Then VDA will need to get overhauled to a system like Delta, where once you get used to it, you go to the bottom of the stack until everyone in seniority order has had the chance. If not, we will have just a select few being able to drop their schedules and enjoy a 200% pay increase.
Reply
Old 02-21-2026 | 03:54 AM
  #150  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,057
Likes: 34
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Lifer rsv by choice.
this would suck so bad.
Same boat. I’d be really ****ed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
tuktukdriver
Major
42
11-16-2013 08:29 AM
Colonel S
United
160
01-26-2013 05:19 PM
nwa757
American
199
01-05-2013 06:13 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices