Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
National Seniority List >

National Seniority List

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

National Seniority List

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2021, 09:44 AM
  #11  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,638
Default

The scope clause at WN alone would be an issue.

Why not a single national carrier then?
at6d is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 09:56 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,078
Default

I’m not even sure there’s a problem? No mainline pilots on the street, no concessions to speak of, and hiring everywhere. Pre covid commuters were starting 50ishk first year. Commuters look to be hiring as well. All things considered this looks like sunshine and rainbows compared to the last two downturns.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:14 AM
  #13  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Position: Sitting
Posts: 223
Default

I'll take it a step further: how about one national carrier? Make commercial aviation a mix of pre-deregulation and have it run like a large government utility company. We become federal employees and get pensions back.

Still think we should work for ALPA and not for the individual airlines though.
reandld is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:22 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,078
Default

Originally Posted by reandld View Post
I'll take it a step further: how about one national carrier? Make commercial aviation a mix of pre-deregulation and have it run like a large government utility company. We become federal employees and get pensions back.

Still think we should work for ALPA and not for the individual airlines though.
That would be a bad idea IMO. For many reasons but I’ll throw out a few. The free market, zero incentive for efficiency. Ticket Prices would go way up. Now I understand thier super low historically speaking but who sets the prices? Do you want to let congress do that? I don’t.
fcoolaiddrinker is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:24 AM
  #15  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Position: Sitting
Posts: 223
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker View Post
That would be a bad idea IMO. For many reasons but I’ll throw out a few. The free market, zero incentive for efficiency. Ticket Prices would go way up. Now I understand thier super low historically speaking but who sets the prices. Do you want to let co guess do that? I don’t.
I don't think people have much of a choice when it comes to traveling. Most families aren't going to take a Greyhound from NYC to LA on a regular basis. And why would the prices go up at all?
reandld is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:26 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,227
Default

Originally Posted by reandld View Post
I'll take it a step further: how about one national carrier? Make commercial aviation a mix of pre-deregulation and have it run like a large government utility company. We become federal employees and get pensions back.

Still think we should work for ALPA and not for the individual airlines though.
Great idea, like the old Aeroflot during the Soviet Union then?
trip is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 10:32 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,808
Default

Let’s have one national cellphone provider, too. And one electric utility. And one grocery store chain.

These are all such great ideas. They’ve worked everywhere they’ve been tried.

For the record, US airline pilots are the most highly compensated in the world. We have by far the best control over our schedules and quality of life. Don’t believe me, go to PPrune or chat up an Emirates crew in the hotel.

Appreciate what we have and recognize the reasons we have it.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 11:04 AM
  #18  
Polyester Pilot
 
sky jet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 777 CA
Posts: 510
Default

As has been stated before, this has been re- hashed every two to three years since deregulation in 1978. How do I know, I've been around almost that long. That ship sailed in the 1920's when almost all pilots flew for airlines whose major income came from the government via mail contracts. Since then the advent of the seniority system and pay per the size of equipment have made pilots invested in the carrier they initially hire into.

I will give you just one of many examples of why it will never work.
Airline A is 60 years old and has a mix of narrow and wide bodies and a fleet size of 500.
Airline B is 75 years old and flies a similar fleet mix and size.

Airline B gets a new CEO, CFO and board and they go into crazy international expansion.
Airline A keeps the course that has made them mostly profitable for 60 years.

Airline B ends up bankrupt and eventually shuts down.
Airline B's senior pilots exercise their national seniority and bump 2/3rds of airline A's pilots out of their jobs. Airline A's pilots then bounce several thousand junior pilots out of their jobs at other majors or regionals. All of those pilots are now bumped or unemployed even though their respective airlines are healthy and profitable.

Oh, but you say, they wouldn't be allowed to bump, just take the next available job from the union. If we would have had this system in 2008 when several airlines went out of business over the course of a few months many of you would have never entered or been able to enter the profession until several thousand unemployed union members got jobs first. Not the pay to fly regional job. Not the low paying regional job. Not at the new start up. Not at the expanding regional or fast growing ULCC. Nothing. Nothing in a cockpit until every last senior Union pilot had been placed back in a flying job.

By the way, COVID? No senior pilot (or at least very, very few) would have taken the early outs that saved so many jobs recently. They would have known that no matter what happened to their carrier they were safe with some airline until 65.

If you've been in the industry less than 10-15 years you wouldn't be in it at all if we had this system. See the problem?
sky jet is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 11:23 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by reandld;[url=tel:3227285
3227285[/url]]I'll take it a step further: how about one national carrier? Make commercial aviation a mix of pre-deregulation and have it run like a large government utility company. We become federal employees and get pensions back.

Still think we should work for ALPA and not for the individual airlines though.
Yeah, like Amtrak and the Post Office. I’m in.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 04-27-2021, 11:27 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

What if you’re at a good (your dream) airline and you’re displaced to the street by senior pilots at a crumby carrier that’s shrinking the staff due to mismanagement?
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DWS1
Major
49
05-28-2016 03:48 PM
CurtissRobin
Cargo
7
03-18-2009 11:59 AM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM
31wins
Cargo
181
09-25-2007 05:17 PM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices