Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Dal, Ual, Fdx. Small town commuter >

Dal, Ual, Fdx. Small town commuter

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Dal, Ual, Fdx. Small town commuter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2022, 12:41 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 283
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
They don't b!tch, but in the 21st century they do on occasion spontaneously combust. I have long-haul friends who lose sleep over that pallet of batteries on over-water flights.
lol. Really? They loose sleep over it? Better change airplanes then.
BertMacklinFBI is offline  
Old 01-12-2022, 02:26 PM
  #22  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by cliffnd View Post
You make fair statements, until your last sentence. Using DXB and BHM as your proof that cargo is somehow less safe overall is a bit disingenuous. Considering the events of 9/11 were all on “Pax majors”…”in recent history,” you appear to be cherry picking to support your life decisions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't get butthert, I didn't say "cargo was less safe" I said it's different rules, some of which of which equate to risk. Those two events have clear root causes in operating rules which are simply more business-friendly than the equivalent rules for pax.

Plenty of upside to cargo too,and everybody knows the top tier make huge bank and second tier do pretty well too.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-12-2022, 04:03 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Don't get butthert, I didn't say "cargo was less safe" I said it's different rules, some of which of which equate to risk. Those two events have clear root causes in operating rules which are simply more business-friendly than the equivalent rules for pax.

Plenty of upside to cargo too,and everybody knows the top tier make huge bank and second tier do pretty well too.

Nobody said I was mad. Where did you get that from? I even said you made fair points. Did you miss that part? But considering the context of this thread and the original post, I think you overstepped your expertise with your safety point which you tried to make with your batteries blowing up and planes crashing examples. My point is going there is conveniently ignoring the known equal if not greater risks involved with passenger carriers even at the majors. Listen, we all justify why we are where we are, and in case you are wondering, yes, my assessment of a lower life threatening environment was in my top 3 reasons of why I left a major pax carrier for the cargo world. I’m fortunate to have had the option and understand some never have. Regardless, hopefully we all have good careers and can enjoy beers with each other at the bar.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
cliffnd is offline  
Old 01-12-2022, 10:52 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I know progress has been made, especially after the DXB incident. Not sure how much of that is regulatory, vice airline policy.

In sum total, the safety regs for 121 pax operations (cargo, 117) are a factor to consider but obviously not the only factor, and individuals can weight it in any manner they see fit. I considered safety because of my family. Pax majors don't have DXB or BHM events in recent history.

Does your equation change if you don’t do long haul cargo? Because that’s extremely easy to do at FedEx.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 01-13-2022, 07:04 AM
  #25  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
Does your equation change if you don’t do long haul cargo? Because that’s extremely easy to do at FedEx.
Some, sure, since you have better odds of getting on the ground safely in the event of cargo fire (ex. PHL). Doesn't change the 117 issue.

I'm not saying don't do it, just something to consider. FDX/UPS are great gigs, but no need to pretend that they're perfect in every way with no downside compared to pax.

If I had owned a crystal ball, I would have done the cargo route, to avoid covid-induced financial issues over the last couple years. But that's 20/20.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-13-2022, 07:06 AM
  #26  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by cliffnd View Post
Nobody said I was mad. Where did you get that from? I even said you made fair points. Did you miss that part? But considering the context of this thread and the original post, I think you overstepped your expertise with your safety point which you tried to make with your batteries blowing up and planes crashing examples. My point is going there is conveniently ignoring the known equal if not greater risks involved with passenger carriers even at the majors. Listen, we all justify why we are where we are, and in case you are wondering, yes, my assessment of a lower life threatening environment was in my top 3 reasons of why I left a major pax carrier for the cargo world. I’m fortunate to have had the option and understand some never have. Regardless, hopefully we all have good careers and can enjoy beers with each other at the bar.
Didn't mean to get sideways on that. Cheers.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-13-2022, 11:19 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Some, sure, since you have better odds of getting on the ground safely in the event of cargo fire (ex. PHL). Doesn't change the 117 issue.

I'm not saying don't do it, just something to consider. FDX/UPS are great gigs, but no need to pretend that they're perfect in every way with no downside compared to pax.

If I had owned a crystal ball, I would have done the cargo route, to avoid covid-induced financial issues over the last couple years. But that's 20/20.

Part 117 is a good point. Some of that is mitigated by the contract.
FXLAX is offline  
Old 01-13-2022, 04:46 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2021
Posts: 90
Default

Originally Posted by FXLAX View Post
Part 117 is a good point. Some of that is mitigated by the contract.
Bumponalog
ogarmyopar is offline  
Old 01-15-2022, 05:35 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 132
Default

I live in a small town, left a legacy for FedEx. Very easy commuting with purple or you can bid dead head trips. Lots of flexibility and options, many more than what I had before.
Coffeepilot1 is offline  
Old 01-16-2022, 11:39 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 62
Default

Sounds like FedEx should be my top priority, which is inline with my initial impressions. I’m thinking I will hold out on putting in apps for United and Delta until I meet the mins for FedEx, and then can submit all three apps at once. Thanks for all the comments.
VanDriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilotfo64
Delta
21
07-08-2015 02:46 PM
Airhoss
Major
1
07-09-2008 06:10 AM
Bloodhound
Major
6
01-14-2008 05:48 AM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
2
02-01-2006 05:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices