|
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3455244)
My guess is early 50s.
Answer those questions and then we can talk about motivations. oh and “ordering” someone to answer your questions over the internet is a very silly look. |
Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
(Post 3455269)
nope but nice try.
oh and “ordering” someone to answer your questions over the internet is a very silly look. 'Ordering'? Yep, definitely a retired kernel. And you're a LUV FO who was hired in late 2017/early 2018. I went with low 50s as a high guess; your age is high 40s. |
Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
(Post 3455229)
You are about as far out of reality as that MyTime2025 troll.
I would benefit from changing the rule to Age 68. So not only are you incorrect in your accusations against me, you are flat out wrong in your reading of other people's motivations. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3455316)
Well, if that is true you are not smart. And I can guarantee that if you are against age 58 out of the goodness of your heart, you are a very small minority (of 1)..
|
Originally Posted by DirtHead
(Post 3455153)
If airliners aren’t all single/0 pilot 30 years from now I’ll eat my hat. I want my money now, not a longer career after 2-3 years of stagnation. I sincerely hope those who have been able to retire in aviation, and have been planning on retirement at 65 can enjoy their next chapter.
|
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3455316)
Well, if that is true you are not smart. And I can guarantee that if you are against age 58 out of the goodness of your heart, you are a very small minority (of 1)..
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3455317)
He'll be in favor of an age change AFTER he gets in the left seat at LUV... 2028 or so?
How do you feel about Biden forgiving student loans? |
Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
(Post 3455030)
Still a negative there. You calling the opposing groups the same doesn't make it so.
Both groups agreed to a set of terms when they joined the profession. Now, one group wants to change those terms to benefit themselves. That is the difference. itd be interested to find an ALPA communication in support of the 60-65 jump from back in the day, replace it with 65 - 68 or whatever and put it out there just for the benefit of those who weren’t flying yet to see how ALPA “sold” it. |
Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
(Post 3455323)
Since this has reached the level of absurdity.......
How do you feel about Biden forgiving student loans? |
Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
(Post 3455323)
Since this has reached the level of absurdity.......
How do you feel about Biden forgiving student loans? |
Originally Posted by Andy
(Post 3455335)
Not absurdity; obfuscation on your part. You're a LUV FO and will oppose any age change until you get your fourth stripe. Then you'll have a 'change of heart' and be all in favor of increasing the age limit.
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 3455349)
Easy, I don't have one, so I am against.
Anyway, I ran the numbers Age 68 or 70 or whatever would result in HIGHER earnings for me....yet I am still opposed to it. Why? Simple, same as the student loans deal. If you agree to certain terms you should stick to them. There is a moral inferiority with those who enter into agreements and then advocate for legislation to change the terms to favor themselves. I won't do it. Others it appears, have no problem sinking to that level. At least they loudly self identify! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands