Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ALPA: Don't raise retirement age >

ALPA: Don't raise retirement age


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ALPA: Don't raise retirement age

Old 05-23-2022 | 12:23 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Exactly. Just like they did last time. ALPA is like an angry chihuahua. They make a lot of noise but run when it gets bad for them.
They make smart decisions when needed. Age 65 came about because ICAO raised their age to 65 and the FAA agreed it was safe for those pilots to fly in the US system. At that point it was game, set, match for the age to go up in the US. There was zero probability of winning in court to maintain age 60 against any of the discrimination lawsuits. Letting a judge rule would have been a disaster so ALPA did the best they could do by supporting legislation that mitigated age 65 to the maximum possible.
The current situation is quite different with ICAO remaining at 65. The FAA can at least go into the courtroom with a straight face and claim it’s a safety issue which is a allowed reason to discriminate on the basis of age. It would also be very difficult for many if not most airlines to schedule pilots between 65 and 67 to fly domestic only.
Reply
Old 05-23-2022 | 04:46 AM
  #52  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
They make smart decisions when needed. Age 65 came about because ICAO raised their age to 65 and the FAA agreed it was safe for those pilots to fly in the US system. At that point it was game, set, match for the age to go up in the US. There was zero probability of winning in court to maintain age 60 against any of the discrimination lawsuits. Letting a judge rule would have been a disaster so ALPA did the best they could do by supporting legislation that mitigated age 65 to the maximum possible.
The current situation is quite different with ICAO remaining at 65. The FAA can at least go into the courtroom with a straight face and claim it’s a safety issue which is a allowed reason to discriminate on the basis of age. It would also be very difficult for many if not most airlines to schedule pilots between 65 and 67 to fly domestic only.
That's what I've been saying. Until ICAO raises it this is DOA. But not because of ALPA. To reiterate, if the winds of politics turn and blow against them, they will flip around like a windsock and claim reams of data supporting it.
Reply
Old 05-23-2022 | 05:36 AM
  #53  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
that crazy government and *checks notes* wanting AIRLINE pilots to have an AIRLINE transport pilot’s license.
It worked for decades just fine that way.
Reply
Old 05-23-2022 | 05:53 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Default

If a younger person asks me about becoming an airline pilot, I generally steer them clear of the career and advise to do other work. From lousy pay through years of "dues paying", a sensitive industry to economic conditions, and too much time away from loved ones, the career is just not worth it.

It may be a good fit for some, but I find the majority of young people I have spoken too would last in the industry. It's just not worth it even if you like flying.
Reply
Old 05-23-2022 | 06:33 AM
  #55  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,115
Likes: 795
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
It worked for decades just fine that way.
Actually it did, because up until about the turn of the century (the rise of then RJs), you needed 1500-2500 hours to get an airline job anyway due to market forces.

But them the RJ's came and they started putting wet commercial noobs into regional jets, with CA's who were often on the very young side as well. The ATP rule was an adaption to the new paradigm.

Yes, there were a few points in time when the majors hired wet commercials in the very distant past, but they had flight engineers and airline safety was a quite different landscape 50-60 years ago. Not apples to oranges. Today we are in a hopefully sustainable era of exceptionally low fatal accident rates.

I wouldn't use a 1965 classic car as a daily driver with my kids either.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 04:59 AM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sonicflyer
alpa has officially adopted a resolution opposing any attempts to increase the retirement age for professional airline pilots.


Source:
https://aerocrewnews.com/aviation-ne...irline-pilots/
alpa is joke.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 06:10 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Obviously increased CBA compensation is good for us. That would be my choice if it were up to me. Duh.

But while that might attract the interest of more noobs, there's not a big difference between $200K- 300K from the perspective of a teenager or college grad... anything in that range is pretty good. Problem is they still have to bridge the 1500 hour valley. A lot of time and money invested, with some uncertainty as to the ultimate outcome. There are a lot of people out there who don't have aviation friends or family, and thus have no idea how to go about it.

With an airline owned or sponsored training program, the airlines could get ab initio pilots to the regionals for about $150K each... so the cost of a junior legacy FO for one year.

Remember regionals are already throwing around cumulative bonuses in that range anyway (and mainline is ultimately footing the bill). If you do sponsored ab initio, the student is obligated to serve X number of years at your regional and/or mainline as payback.

The current regional bonuses are just fighting for qualified pilots. Ab initio would attract new pilots. Especially since they don't have to take a lot of responsibility on themselves, other than complete training.


But this is just discussion, the ship has already sailed and it would probably take the majors several years to get something like this set up. They might even have to get the mfgs to increase production of ASEL trainers to have enough capacity. They assumed the GA industry would step up on their own, and of course they could not. COVID-induced industry uncertainty probably spooked a few potential students as well (mu cousin's husband bailed on his flight training in early 2020).
I was kinda thinking things will evolve to something similar. Legacy guarantees loan for flight training for an applicant. If the student stays in school to completion, instructs at their designated school to the minimum hour limit for regional hiring and then works their designated regional then the legacy makes the payments on the loan. If hired or flowed to the legacy then the loan is paid off by legacy. If the student departs this designated path, he’s on the hook to pay back the loan. All in, probably costs the legacies a lot less than the bonuses that are being paid out to regional pilots right now even if you factor that some students leave and default on the loan guaranteed by the legacy. It’s too late to fix the current vacuum at that level but would help down the line.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 06:59 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HalinTexas
Is rather have a national seniority list, and ALPA and every other Union take care of the furloughed.
That’s the only answer.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 07:24 AM
  #59  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
So the unions don't want to allow an extension of retirement age, and they don't want to lower the artificially high entry barrier, so what solutions are they actually coming up with to help solve at least the current short term acute pilot shortage?
I don’t see them protesting Aviate. Or Flows.
It’s not about just pay and QOL. It’s a vision of a stable career for those looking to join. The fact that airlines whipsaw and furlough so easily causes many to avoid this industry.
Reply
Old 05-25-2022 | 06:05 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BlueScholar
There are more ATP holders than commercial pilot jobs. How is that a shortage?
How many of these ATP holders are over 65 and how many have Corporate Jobs. We need these stats to prove/dis-prove the surplus of ATP’s data

Last edited by CFIsoonToBeFO; 05-25-2022 at 06:22 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices