Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ALPA: Don't raise retirement age >

ALPA: Don't raise retirement age

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ALPA: Don't raise retirement age

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2022 | 02:51 PM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 678
Likes: 8
From: B747 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
That is not even close to the truth. Mid 90s American Eagle (Envoy) had the highest mins at 1500/300. You could get a job at Comair/ASA and a host of others (PFT) with 1200/200. I believe Mesaba was the lowest non-PFT mins at 1000tt.
I remember all the flying magazines back in the 90s where advertising flight training 0-1500 hours at a fixed cost.
Reply
Old 05-28-2022 | 02:57 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 59
Default

I seem to recall mid 90’s it was still pretty rough if you weren’t willing to pay to train in mostly turboprops. Took some 135 experience and several thousand hrs. It started loosening up late 90’s when everyone started getting a bunch of rj’s.
Reply
Old 05-28-2022 | 03:22 PM
  #73  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 14
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

If you were willing to pay, it wasn’t hard to get in. I can think of about 15 instructors I worked with that paid their money to Continental Express in 96 and were hired at mins.

Yes they were TPs, but that’s all there was except for Air Whisky or whoever flew the handful of BAE 146s for United.
Reply
Old 05-28-2022 | 03:47 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
If you were willing to pay, it wasn’t hard to get in. I can think of about 15 instructors I worked with that paid their money to Continental Express in 96 and were hired at mins.

Yes they were TPs, but that’s all there was except for Air Whisky or whoever flew the handful of BAE 146s for United.

Yeah I remember those days. Continental Express washed a bunch of those low time pay to train pilots out though. I skipped the pay to train and went 135 captain in various turboprops. The problem became you just didn’t build time like 121 and with everyone now having 121 jet had to go to xjt anyhow to get competitive.
Reply
Old 05-28-2022 | 03:57 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by Wingedbeast
Why not just get rid of the 1500 hour rule?

Bring all the rj’s under mainline contracts, pay close to jb 190 dl 220 rates and the captain a check airman with check airman override and I wouldn’t have a problem with that. That really should have happened years ago. That’s my opinion anyhow.
Reply
Old 05-29-2022 | 12:45 AM
  #76  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 131
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
Bring all the rj’s under mainline contracts, pay close to jb 190 dl 220 rates and the captain a check airman with check airman override and I wouldn’t have a problem with that. That really should have happened years ago. That’s my opinion anyhow.
If all regional flying was brought in-house. Assuming they could still staff, would Mesa through Skywest give up? What would they become if not fee for departure? Just curious about unintended consequences from such a hypothetical. Could they create wage pressure by going big flying wide body at narrow body rates.
Reply
Old 05-29-2022 | 02:59 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
The fundamental problem is that the aviation market is overregulated. These problems are caused by government and will not be fixed until government gets out of the way.
Wow what a typical management stooge response.
Reply
Old 05-29-2022 | 03:00 AM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
So the unions don't want to allow an extension of retirement age, and they don't want to lower the artificially high entry barrier, so what solutions are they actually coming up with to help solve at least the current short term acute pilot shortage?
Who let the management troll in here?
Reply
Old 05-29-2022 | 03:05 AM
  #79  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 68
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Neither lowering the entry requirements or extending the retirement age at the current point in time will have any effect on wages.
It is extremely apparent you have no understanding of basic economics.

All the major airlines are in contract negotiations and due to the pilot shortage, pay will be going UP.

If you artificially stop retirements for 3 years and lower the requirements for entry thus increasing the pool of available new hires THE OBVIOUS EFFECT IS WAGES WILL STAGNATE OR GO LOWER.
Reply
Old 05-29-2022 | 03:45 AM
  #80  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 986
Likes: 37
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
It worked for decades just fine that way.


Tell that to the families of Colgan flight 3407. Things work until they don’t…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices