Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)
#151
Lol equally likely they got hired straight into a major in the 90’s, skipped the regionals entirely, upgraded in 3 years and avoided both furloughs but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
honestly I don’t have a problem with stagnation, I have a problem with AQP coddling people (this applies to both sides of the age spectrum by the way, but this is going to exacerbate the problem) and with seniority being violated since ICAO has made no mention of a similar age increase. Pretty rich that the “don’t worry you’ll be senior someday” crowd has no problem with 66/67 year olds stealing domestic trips and NB seats from younger but more senior pilots.
honestly I don’t have a problem with stagnation, I have a problem with AQP coddling people (this applies to both sides of the age spectrum by the way, but this is going to exacerbate the problem) and with seniority being violated since ICAO has made no mention of a similar age increase. Pretty rich that the “don’t worry you’ll be senior someday” crowd has no problem with 66/67 year olds stealing domestic trips and NB seats from younger but more senior pilots.
“The 90’s were an amazing decade for getting hired at a major airline”….. things never said by pilots who were there.
#152
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,462
Hired straight into a major in the 90’s?? From WHERE? An F-18 or C-5? Most of the 90’s had thousands of Eastern, Pan Am and Midway pilots on the street. The 90’s had pay for apply, pay for interview, and pay for training to sit right seat in a Brazilia for 17k a year in the HOPES you MIGHT make it to a major. Late 98-99 were good hiring years, and even THEN, you still had to have Turbine PIC, (sometimes 500 turbine PIC 121) and degree and in the case of SWA a 737 type. And then 1.5 to 2 years later 9/11 goes down.
“The 90’s were an amazing decade for getting hired at a major airline”….. things never said by pilots who were there.
“The 90’s were an amazing decade for getting hired at a major airline”….. things never said by pilots who were there.
with the exception of some single seat guys, just about everyone in my class had at least 3-4K hours, with the average probably closer to 5k. I think everyone except maybe one person had TPIC. The average age of everyone was around 37. This was right before Covid
#156
Banned
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 411
The bigger question is why in the world do people give a sh*t when someone else retires? Deal with your own life and stay out of others personal decisions. Like listening to 3rd graders fighting over the kick ball. Now go sit in the corner until you can stop pouting. Age is going up to 67 so just deal with it and stop acting like spoiled rotten babies.
#157
Waiting in the Wings
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Whatever she wants
Posts: 115
Well, one definitely gets a sense of entitlement coming from the younger pilots here. But as I said it's not as simple as they are making it out to be. They probably see me walking around the airport and think "there's another Boomer standing in my way to those cush senior lines" when in all probability, they are senior to me and standing in MY way. You just never know.
Everyone's situation is different and we all made choices. We are also all under the thumb of the fate of our timing of when 9-11/2008/COVID etc. happened in relation to our careers. I'm happy I joined the military and got to do what I did - means I made less money than my buddies who went straight to the airlines, but I got to see the world, do interesting things, and I got a military retirement.
I think the younger pilots right now should feel fortunate they are coming into the industry when they are - a 'relatively' easy path to a (hopefully) long career with the airlines in (hopefully) stable times. I'm happy for them. But please don't blame me or my generation for all of your perceived issues.
Everyone's situation is different and we all made choices. We are also all under the thumb of the fate of our timing of when 9-11/2008/COVID etc. happened in relation to our careers. I'm happy I joined the military and got to do what I did - means I made less money than my buddies who went straight to the airlines, but I got to see the world, do interesting things, and I got a military retirement.
I think the younger pilots right now should feel fortunate they are coming into the industry when they are - a 'relatively' easy path to a (hopefully) long career with the airlines in (hopefully) stable times. I'm happy for them. But please don't blame me or my generation for all of your perceived issues.
#158
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 688
The bigger question is why in the world do people give a sh*t when someone else retires? Deal with your own life and stay out of others personal decisions. Like listening to 3rd graders fighting over the kick ball. Now go sit in the corner until you can stop pouting. Age is going up to 67 so just deal with it and stop acting like spoiled rotten babies.
#159
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: MD-88 FO
Posts: 1,564
Really? In a seniority based system where your upward movement is literally based on retirements you wonder why people care? I mean you can be for or against raising the age but it's not rocket surgery to figure out that stopping mandatory retirements for 2 years affects everyone on the list.
#160
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 147
Should pilots be forced to retire at age 65 so that younger pilots are able to move up? No.
Should pilots be forced to retire at age 65 so that they aren't a threat to the flying public? Yes.
If you disagree with that second statement, I'd challenge you to go hang out with a group of 65 year olds. I get to on a daily basis here in corporate America. They tend to fall in three camps:
1.) Masters: Guys and gals who've seen it all, retained most of it, and are an incredible asset to the corporation. When they speak, people stop and listen. People actively seek out their council. They have a tremendous amount of knowledge and skill, and the ability to dispense it as needed.
2.) Experts: These guys and gals have been around forever. They found a quiet little niche, and enjoy it. They're experts at their small piece of the pie.
3.) Liabilities: These folks have been with the company since the dawn of time, and they have no problem reminding you of that. They reached their apex on the corporate ladder 10-20 years ago, back when they were a Manager/Director/VP. They've been shuffled down a couple rungs since then, via various means. But they still carry themselves as if they had their former title. They're incredibly adept at telling people what they should do, and incredibly inadept at actually accomplishing any useful work. People actively avoid them, and avoid getting on projects with them.
~When you look at the over-65 crowd at the company, only about 20% of them are Masters or Experts. The rest are Liabilities. The problem none of the Liabilities actually recognize they're a Liability. They all think they're a Master, or at least an Expert.
The old adage of "fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts" holds true.
Masters and Experts are generally more self aware, and recognize when their mental faculties may be on the decline. You notice they'll reserve the morning for any mentally intensive task (meetings, etc). They've recognized that, as the day goes on, their abilities have started to diminish in a way they didn't just a few short years ago. Often, they'll move to part time or consultant status.
Liabilities on the other hand, they're Full Speed Ahead. No one can get in their way. If you watch them, you see they do OK early in the day, but as they get tired, they get argumentative and pushy. They sometimes struggle to get their point across, or struggle to form their thoughts, and they just don't understand why. That makes them even more irritated, and they come across as difficult and grumpy. No matter though, they'll just push through by moving faster and talking louder. No youngsters are going to stand in their way!
Medical science is good at a lot of things, but they don't have a handle on cognitive decline due to aging. Some people are sharp into their 90s, some people deteriorate in their 50s. For some, it happens overnight, for others it's a long, slow decline.
I don't know the answer, but dealing with a bunch of Liabilities in the workplace has been an incredible headache. I think it's a good deal for the general public if pilots (and other professions) gracefully bow-out at 65.
Should pilots be forced to retire at age 65 so that they aren't a threat to the flying public? Yes.
If you disagree with that second statement, I'd challenge you to go hang out with a group of 65 year olds. I get to on a daily basis here in corporate America. They tend to fall in three camps:
1.) Masters: Guys and gals who've seen it all, retained most of it, and are an incredible asset to the corporation. When they speak, people stop and listen. People actively seek out their council. They have a tremendous amount of knowledge and skill, and the ability to dispense it as needed.
2.) Experts: These guys and gals have been around forever. They found a quiet little niche, and enjoy it. They're experts at their small piece of the pie.
3.) Liabilities: These folks have been with the company since the dawn of time, and they have no problem reminding you of that. They reached their apex on the corporate ladder 10-20 years ago, back when they were a Manager/Director/VP. They've been shuffled down a couple rungs since then, via various means. But they still carry themselves as if they had their former title. They're incredibly adept at telling people what they should do, and incredibly inadept at actually accomplishing any useful work. People actively avoid them, and avoid getting on projects with them.
~
The old adage of "fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts" holds true.
Masters and Experts are generally more self aware, and recognize when their mental faculties may be on the decline. You notice they'll reserve the morning for any mentally intensive task (meetings, etc). They've recognized that, as the day goes on, their abilities have started to diminish in a way they didn't just a few short years ago. Often, they'll move to part time or consultant status.
Liabilities on the other hand, they're Full Speed Ahead. No one can get in their way. If you watch them, you see they do OK early in the day, but as they get tired, they get argumentative and pushy. They sometimes struggle to get their point across, or struggle to form their thoughts, and they just don't understand why. That makes them even more irritated, and they come across as difficult and grumpy. No matter though, they'll just push through by moving faster and talking louder. No youngsters are going to stand in their way!
Medical science is good at a lot of things, but they don't have a handle on cognitive decline due to aging. Some people are sharp into their 90s, some people deteriorate in their 50s. For some, it happens overnight, for others it's a long, slow decline.
I don't know the answer, but dealing with a bunch of Liabilities in the workplace has been an incredible headache. I think it's a good deal for the general public if pilots (and other professions) gracefully bow-out at 65.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post