Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)
#591
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,499
It appears that those entering the industry *this* decade should not *have* to fly past 55 if they don't want. If they want to, that's different.
But folks much over 40 did not enjoy the meteoric trajectory you have today. I personally enjoyed about a decade in the right of regional airfcraft and that was back when it didn't pay six figures... on the low end of five figures
But folks much over 40 did not enjoy the meteoric trajectory you have today. I personally enjoyed about a decade in the right of regional airfcraft and that was back when it didn't pay six figures... on the low end of five figures
#592
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 21
A picture is worth a thousand words
Just think if the retirement age was 78 how much Social Security would be helped out. Only 0.9 yrs of payments needed
Just think if the retirement age was 78 how much Social Security would be helped out. Only 0.9 yrs of payments needed
#594
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
#595
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,192
Social security was started in 1935. The average life expectancy in 1935 was 59.9 for males and 63.0 for females. https://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html There was no early retirement age at 62; that change took place in 1956 for women and 1961 for men.
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
#596
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,951
Social security was started in 1935. The average life expectancy in 1935 was 59.9 for males and 63.0 for females. https://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html There was no early retirement age at 62; that change took place in 1956 for women and 1961 for men.
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
#597
Social security was started in 1935. The average life expectancy in 1935 was 59.9 for males and 63.0 for females. https://u.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html There was no early retirement age at 62; that change took place in 1956 for women and 1961 for men.
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
Changing retirement age to 80 for Social Security would be more appropriate if you're using current life expectancy and want to match years in retirement when the program was started.
The notion of living a long time in retirement is a relatively recent concept.
#598
Does that chart exclude infant mortality? The concept that people in the past used to live much shorter lives is usually rooted in including infant mortality in life expectancy. The data you really want is how long does the average person who survived until adulthood live.
Even in this century infant and youth mortality is a big factor. Plenty of death by crime and misadventure in men under age 40, then it tapers off quite a bit.
For our discussions we should really be looking at what's the life expectancy for upper middle class professionals over age 40, who tend to live healthy and have access to good healthcare.
Those numbers should work for airline pilots under 40 too... they don't participate in much gang violence, and if they do adventure sports they are typically more methodical about it than the average yahoo.
Actually it's the women, who statistically live six years longer than men, who might have an incentive to work longer.
#600
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,165
That's the way it's been through most of history.
You'd have to contact the author of that webpage for that detail.
Or you can post a link to life expectancy data that starts at adulthood.
Does that chart exclude infant mortality? The concept that people in the past used to live much shorter lives is usually rooted in including infant mortality in life expectancy. The data you really want is how long does the average person who survived until adulthood live.
Or you can post a link to life expectancy data that starts at adulthood.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post