Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
MAX extension not in current defense bill >

MAX extension not in current defense bill

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

MAX extension not in current defense bill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2022 | 07:17 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 372
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Not happening. The MAX 8 and 9 have already been certified and currently flying as they are.
It's not but it should.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Once they reengaged the stab trim cutout switches, the CA tried the AP on and obviously it didn't work because he was pulling the yoke about half way back to keep the plane nose up when MCAS was firing down. So desperate was he to engage the AP again, he completely let go of the yoke pressure and then pushed for AP on. The airplane literally nose dove at that point into the ground.
Nice cover forgetting to mention that the manual trim wouldn't move at all - at which point what can you do? Nose is trimmed basically full down, and in a battle between stab and elevator, the stab always wins.

Like it or not Boeing built a POS with the max. A plane with "surprise lawn dart mode" which gives you ten seconds to recover or die.
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 08:04 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,235
Likes: 81
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Pretty sure AA put in the first Max order and wanted it to be a common type.
Any airline that operates the 737 wants it to be a common type. Delta's order alone of 100 maxes has a contingency that the 1000 must be a common type for execution.
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 08:20 AM
  #33  
rightside02's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 6
From: Airbus 320 Right Seat
Default

The bill will get extended. Too much riding on this not too . Lobbyist have to place the money in the right hands.

This is all for show
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 08:55 AM
  #34  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,888
Likes: 684
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy81
Pretty sure AA put in the first Max order and wanted it to be a common type.
Everybody wants it to be a common type... otherwise the majority of airlines would just order 321XLR which is a common type for something they already have.

I think MAX 10 economics take a big, big hit if it's an army of one type-rating wise.
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 09:07 AM
  #35  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,183
Likes: 238
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

I think MAX 10 economics take a big, big hit if it's an army of one type-rating wise.
Absolutely, which is the reason there ever WAS a MAX rather than a clean sheet design. Now if they’d cleaned up the 757 aerodynamically a bit and with the right modern engines…(sigh).
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 10:32 AM
  #36  
elmetal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nene
Any airline that operates the 737 wants it to be a common type. Delta's order alone of 100 maxes has a contingency that the 1000 must be a common type for execution.
What's the 1000?

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 11:48 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 197
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by elmetal
What's the 1000?

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk
-10.

probably took the -800 shortened to -8 and did the reverse making -10 into 1000
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 01:04 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,201
Likes: 32
From: 4A2FU
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
Absolutely, which is the reason there ever WAS a MAX rather than a clean sheet design. Now if they’d cleaned up the 757 aerodynamically a bit and with the right modern engines…(sigh).
There honestly isn't much to clean up on that glider. Just needs a better engine now.
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 01:17 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 332
Default

Originally Posted by 4dalulz
It's not but it should.



Nice cover forgetting to mention that the manual trim wouldn't move at all - at which point what can you do? Nose is trimmed basically full down, and in a battle between stab and elevator, the stab always wins.

Like it or not Boeing built a POS with the max. A plane with "surprise lawn dart mode" which gives you ten seconds to recover or die.
And how did they allow their trim to move full nose down? It's not like it was happening blindly to them.

Lets face it, right after takeoff when the AOA sheared to an unrealistic nose high position due to a bird strike, the CA stick shaker going off, the CA asked THREE TIMES for the AP to be engaged. With mismatched AOAs, mismatched airspeeds, and a stick shaker going off.

Once he asked for the AP to be on 3 times, you knew the kind of CA you have (a button pusher). Everyone on this plane was doomed from that moment forward. You didn't have an aviator in that seat. You had a routine, scripted robot who was reverting to "Autopilot engage!"
Reply
Old 10-13-2022 | 01:33 PM
  #40  
elmetal's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
-10.



probably took the -800 shortened to -8 and did the reverse making -10 into 1000
Oh I knew what he meant. I was being pedantic because a 1000 doesn't exist, that's all.

Sent from my Pixel 6a using Tapatalk
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
docav8tor
Southwest
66
11-26-2020 02:24 PM
docav8tor
Southwest
14
02-22-2020 03:59 PM
MAWK90
Cargo
245
03-07-2011 06:54 AM
johnso29
Major
192
08-12-2010 04:06 AM
B317
Major
63
11-27-2009 02:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices