Age 67 bill
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,788
That is why most believe if/when it ever goes to one pilot it will take an emergency with a release from ground control for any person in the cockpit to exercise control airborne.
#82
That only works if you design the cockpit so that the lone pilot cannot simply create a convenient emergency to facilitate his own release... that's quite a rabbit hole, go down very far and it starts to look cheap and easy just to keep the FO
#83
On Reserve
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 22
The Elephant in the room is about a possible future health issue that could occur since there wasn't any testing on pilots and the affects on flight physiology, so yes there should be 2 pilots. This thread is about age 67 and if that occurs, there should be other limitations in place for safety.
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Sure. But our profession is more complicated than medicine, lots of unpredictability and uncertainty... if you go down the medical road, you're going to end up in a good place one way or another. But if a young person (or potential career changer) talks to career airline pilots, they'll get mixed reviews at best, largely due to past instability.
Law is more like airlines, lower barriers to entry but also hard to make it to the top tier. For every major firm partner, there are 1000 junior associates putting in 80 hour weeks, and public defenders and strip mall ambulance chasers who qualify for food stamps.
When I was mentioning ab initio as a solution, I was speaking from the POV of the people who have the problem: airlines.
I'm not advocating that pilot groups/unions should be facilitating or encouraging paid training pipelines (it's out of our hands regardless, since union jurisdiction only extends back to day one of indoc). Although at some point if growth (or negative growth) gets bad enough due to pilot shortage, we might actually have an incentive to help generate new pilots.
Law is more like airlines, lower barriers to entry but also hard to make it to the top tier. For every major firm partner, there are 1000 junior associates putting in 80 hour weeks, and public defenders and strip mall ambulance chasers who qualify for food stamps.
When I was mentioning ab initio as a solution, I was speaking from the POV of the people who have the problem: airlines.
I'm not advocating that pilot groups/unions should be facilitating or encouraging paid training pipelines (it's out of our hands regardless, since union jurisdiction only extends back to day one of indoc). Although at some point if growth (or negative growth) gets bad enough due to pilot shortage, we might actually have an incentive to help generate new pilots.
#85
If they're good with TSIC, then it's five-ish years.
Not comparable to law, medicine, accounting, etc since the demand for those remains fairly steady-state, without severe industry swings which tend to force hiring waves and subsequent boom / bust cycles.
#86
Yet, if a Vet wanted to use his benefits to the fullest extent. You enroll into a Part 141 University where it covers 100 percent tuition and fees and get paid E5 BAH and knock flight training out in 2 to 3 years…..
#87
As I said, .gov is spring-loaded to support higher education, not so much votech.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,184
Assuming you need a degree. And flight training only takes 6 months to a year max. Your quoted university program takes 100-200% longer
#89
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: N/A
Posts: 582
Basically, we covered the FAA required stuff and a little bit extra at my school, versus tons of extra stuff at the university.
#90
So let’s pretend I’m an airline CEO/CFO or even just a bean counter.
65-67 for the majority will be the most senior crew members with the highest pay and the most vacation days that cherry pick the lines with the lowest block aka the most expensive.
Why would I agree to this again?
65-67 for the majority will be the most senior crew members with the highest pay and the most vacation days that cherry pick the lines with the lowest block aka the most expensive.
Why would I agree to this again?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post