IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67
#1171
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
Cool your are back. Starting off with the incivility that APiC is famous for. Good morning!
You said: "refusing to answer direct questions". So far you have listed one. How I much have I donated to EPAS/LEFP! Is that the only question! Another poster added: if I will continue to donate!
All those ALL of the questions that I have refused to answer?
Are there any other?
You said: "refusing to answer direct questions". So far you have listed one. How I much have I donated to EPAS/LEFP! Is that the only question! Another poster added: if I will continue to donate!
All those ALL of the questions that I have refused to answer?
Are there any other?
#1172
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 536
Likes: 140
The funny thing is that this feels like explaining to your grandma not to fall for phone scams, but they still fall for it. The way they operate, LEPF/EPAS is basically committing elderly abuse, but no matter how much we warn them, people keep donating and impacting their savings. At the very least it shows poor judgement, and you don't want that in a 121 cockpit. Especially squandering money like that into the pockets of grifters after complaining that they don't have enough to retire.
#1173
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
The poster said questions. So far she has listed 1. Has got to chime in with 'that's it" first which means I have in fact answered every single other question ask of me.
#1177
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
He isn’t answering the question. He said “questions,” but so far there’s only one: how much to EPAS/LEPF.
A second poster asked a different one: will I continue to donate.
Then you chimed in with a personal interpretation of what LEPF “implied.” Is that the moderator speaking, or just another APC poster?
The first poster clearly said they asking for money. That is factually incorrect!I handle this like with my CP: “Am I talking to you as CP/moderator or as Biff?” If it’s CP/moderator, I say “have a good day.” If it’s personal, we can engage. I’ll take it you weren’t wearing the moderator hat when you jumped in with a personal read on words they asked for more money.You have every right to read whatever you need to read into the words.But they did NOT ask for more money.
That was a lie of the original poster. The echo chamber is desperate to create the fake narrative that they did. Biff, is on that too! They did not. Saying they will is just another way of saying they did, by changing the time period. They didn't. Correct?
Will I continue to donate? YES. Why? I have friends on both BODs, and they’ll remain involved after retirement. If they ask me to help cover others’ travel, I’ll help.
How much have I helped before when asked? My ALPA dues refund this year (thanks, Wes).
A second poster asked a different one: will I continue to donate.
Then you chimed in with a personal interpretation of what LEPF “implied.” Is that the moderator speaking, or just another APC poster?
The first poster clearly said they asking for money. That is factually incorrect!I handle this like with my CP: “Am I talking to you as CP/moderator or as Biff?” If it’s CP/moderator, I say “have a good day.” If it’s personal, we can engage. I’ll take it you weren’t wearing the moderator hat when you jumped in with a personal read on words they asked for more money.You have every right to read whatever you need to read into the words.But they did NOT ask for more money.
That was a lie of the original poster. The echo chamber is desperate to create the fake narrative that they did. Biff, is on that too! They did not. Saying they will is just another way of saying they did, by changing the time period. They didn't. Correct?
Will I continue to donate? YES. Why? I have friends on both BODs, and they’ll remain involved after retirement. If they ask me to help cover others’ travel, I’ll help.
How much have I helped before when asked? My ALPA dues refund this year (thanks, Wes).
#1179
A scab was someone that crossed a picket line to replace a striking worker. I’m assuming you have a job at an airline within the US? If the mandatory retirement age was raised to 67, or even eliminated entirely you’d still have that job.
If however you are not yet employed at a part 121 carrier, well none of us here owe you a job.
Nothing “scab like” about wanting to keep working in a career you love and have been active in for 30+ years.
If however you are not yet employed at a part 121 carrier, well none of us here owe you a job.
Nothing “scab like” about wanting to keep working in a career you love and have been active in for 30+ years.
https://www.capeairpilots.com
net jets too.
okay not scab-like. You win
#1180
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
Full circle!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




