Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67 >

IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2025 | 06:52 AM
  #1801  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 615
Likes: 148
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide
Could you use the same justification for not collecting social security? Technically you pay into both so what is the difference morally and ethically speaking?
Unemployment is meant to help bridge the gap between jobs after an unexpected loss of employment.
You are talking about abusing a system after a previously agreed upon RETIREMENT age.

If you struggle to see the difference, you are doing a lot of mental gymnastics trying to justify yourself. You know the truth.
Old 12-28-2025 | 06:55 AM
  #1802  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,481
Likes: 478
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide
Could you use the same justification for not collecting social security? Technically you pay into both so what is the difference morally and ethically speaking?

No, you could not. SS is a retirement system, unemployment is not. You hit a known retirement age of your job. It's unsurprising that this crowd doesn't see the difference.
Old 12-28-2025 | 07:07 AM
  #1803  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 776
Likes: 308
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide
Could you use the same justification for not collecting social security? Technically you pay into both so what is the difference morally and ethically speaking?
Are these people going to apply for section 8 housing too? Where’s the cutoff? Collecting social security but not unemployment is a fair cutoff
Old 12-28-2025 | 07:16 AM
  #1804  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 119
Default

FWIW, in Pennsylvania you can claim unemployment for a year(?) When you hit 65. Some guys even switch bases at 64 to do it. It’s basically state mandated participation in an unemployment insurance, and even those that live out of state also pay it.
Old 12-28-2025 | 07:23 AM
  #1805  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 776
Likes: 308
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
FWIW, in Pennsylvania you can claim unemployment for a year(?) When you hit 65. Some guys even switch bases at 64 to do it. It’s basically state mandated participation in an unemployment insurance, and even those that live out of state also pay it.
They commute for a year for a few pennies of unemployment. Work smarter nor harder!
Old 12-28-2025 | 07:47 AM
  #1806  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB
FWIW, in Pennsylvania you can claim unemployment for a year(?) When you hit 65. Some guys even switch bases at 64 to do it. It’s basically state mandated participation in an unemployment insurance, and even those that live out of state also pay it.
YOLOing your entire 401k on the latest r/wallstreetbets pump and dump is so much easier
Old 12-28-2025 | 08:30 AM
  #1807  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,310
Likes: 1,317
Default

Originally Posted by Bestglide
Agreed that fired wasn’t the case, but I was just using the example as a way of collecting unemployment. Either “fired” or laid off.
Yeah, fair enough. I wan't trying to highlight you, just that word in this context is especially irritating every time I see it.
Old 12-28-2025 | 09:01 AM
  #1808  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

If a LEPFer runs a race and he finishes in first place, is he happy he won or is he mad he's the "first one kicked out of the sporting event" while the slower competitors are still allowed to run?
Old 12-28-2025 | 09:36 AM
  #1809  
Bestglide's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 546
Likes: 30
From: 756 left...
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
No, you could not. SS is a retirement system, unemployment is not. You hit a known retirement age of your job. It's unsurprising that this crowd doesn't see the difference.
I’m trying to say that they are both paid for benefits. Some on here are trying to say if u make too much money like most of us do that you don’t need the money and save it for those less fortunate. I guess my question was if you don’t need it why take SS? Should you Leave it for the less fortunate?
Old 12-28-2025 | 09:57 AM
  #1810  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 119
Default

Originally Posted by MrBogardi
They commute for a year for a few pennies of unemployment. Work smarter nor harder!
my guess is they were already commuting to a different base? No idea
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satchip
Corporate
11
09-16-2009 07:22 PM
eFDeeeX
Cargo
59
01-31-2008 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices