Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67 >

IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2025 | 11:35 AM
  #401  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,104
Likes: 791
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by FutureMajor8
Will age 67 get voted on in this upcoming ICAO meeting that’s scheduled in a few weeks? Or is it to review the potential of a increased retirement age rollout?

I’ve heard that it may still take a few years before ICAO agrees to raise the age..?
IATA is making a formal proposal to raise the age, at the ICAO conference.

The interests and equities of both groups are similar, to enhance commercial aviation. ICAO is not really a regulatory agency, more of a clearinghouse to coordinate international regulatory inter-operability.

IATA directly represents the airlines

ICAO also tends to represent the airlines, through their respective national governments. Who typically want their airlines to thrive, as economic enablers.

Trump just appointed a pro 67 rep to ICAO.

Given all that I'd say the odds are better than even that ICAO raises the age, but I'd imagine a two-ish year timeline to implementation. Then another 6-12 months for Congress to raise our age, which would be almost inevitable.
Old 09-05-2025 | 11:59 AM
  #402  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 255
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
IATA is making a formal proposal to raise the age, at the ICAO conference.

The interests and equities of both groups are similar, to enhance commercial aviation. ICAO is not really a regulatory agency, more of a clearinghouse to coordinate international regulatory inter-operability.

IATA directly represents the airlines

ICAO also tends to represent the airlines, through their respective national governments. Who typically want their airlines to thrive, as economic enablers.

Trump just appointed a pro 67 rep to ICAO.

Given all that I'd say the odds are better than even that ICAO raises the age, but I'd imagine a two-ish timeline to implementation. Then another 6-12 months for Congress to raise our age, which would be almost inevitable.
Perfect timing. The year I turn 65! Got it right for once... /jk
Old 09-05-2025 | 05:30 PM
  #403  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 372
Default

Originally Posted by fw90
ICAO has plenty of evidence to support are 60 being the appropriate cutoff and only raised it to 65 following the US who ALSO had tons of data to support 60 but congress was lobbied and raised it anyway.
Made up BS. ICAO changed the age to 65 in 2006 after a 2 year study when it was proposed. The US didn't change the Age to 65 until over a year later in 2007. Your assertion that the ICAO changed because they "followed the US" is bizarre. If you are a pilot you should turn in your medical immediately since you likely have some kind of mental disability.

The US ICAO rep voted against the age change to 65. This nonsense that "ICAO is waiting for the US to tell them to change the age" is ridiculous. ICAO has over 100 member countries and the executive board has 36 votes, almost all are in countries where the max age is 65 or less. So the idea they will change it is not likely at all. If it changes, it will be 2027 or 2028 at the earliest.
Old 09-05-2025 | 06:05 PM
  #404  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,429
Likes: 123
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Perfect timing. The year I turn 65! Got it right for once... /jk
Age 65 was Dec. 13, 2007. Guys who turned 65 on Dec. 12th got nada. It might be close for you if that timeline comes true.
Old 09-05-2025 | 06:08 PM
  #405  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,429
Likes: 123
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
???

Actually ICAO went to 65 first, the the US followed (congress did it, because the FAA stalled).

"Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?"

"When the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!?! They didn't bomb Pearl Harbor, the Japanese did."

"He's on a roll....let him go."

;-)
Old 09-05-2025 | 06:14 PM
  #406  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,429
Likes: 123
From: Window seat
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot

The US ICAO rep voted against the age change to 65. This nonsense that "ICAO is waiting for the US to tell them to change the age" is ridiculous. ICAO has over 100 member countries and the executive board has 36 votes, almost all are in countries where the max age is 65 or less. So the idea they will change it is not likely at all. If it changes, it will be 2027 or 2028 at the earliest.
Nine countries allow 65+ airline flying. Five of them are on the ICAO executive board.

Beats me what ICAO will do, if anything. Same goes for the U.S.
Old 09-05-2025 | 07:14 PM
  #407  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,178
Likes: 255
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
Age 65 was Dec. 13, 2007. Guys who turned 65 on Dec. 12th got nada. It might be close for you if that timeline comes true.
Not that old... /jk = just kidding
Old 09-06-2025 | 02:59 PM
  #408  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot

The US ICAO rep voted against the age change to 65. This nonsense that "ICAO is waiting for the US to tell them to change the age" is ridiculous.
The “former” rep did yes, the new one specifically supports age 67. As does the President, the Sec Transportation, the Admin of the FAA and now the Republicans are in charge of all the Committees where it as shot down last year by a party line 1 vote. 67 will likely happen before the end of this year.
Old 09-06-2025 | 03:19 PM
  #409  
Meme In Command's Avatar
Leaves Biscoff crumbs
Veteran: Army
Loved
On Reserve
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,265
Likes: 941
From: Blue Juice Taste Tester
Default

Originally Posted by Softheborder
The “former” rep did yes, the new one specifically supports age 67. As does the President, the Sec Transportation, the Admin of the FAA and now the Republicans are in charge of all the Committees where it as shot down last year by a party line 1 vote. 67 will likely happen before the end of this year.
Oh the historically anti-labor politicians are in favor of squeezing 2 more years of productivity out of labor? No way....

This is my shocked face 😐
Old 09-06-2025 | 05:10 PM
  #410  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 225
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Meme In Command
Oh the historically anti-labor politicians are in favor of squeezing 2 more years of productivity out of labor? No way....

This is my shocked face 😐
Ironic isn’t it that the Union Worker Pilots historically vote for the Party that will now implement what ROUGHLY 2/3 of them do not want. I’ll take my $2M extra for 5 days a month, it’ll take the sting out of 2 years of stagnation we’re all about to face.

You get what you vote for.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satchip
Corporate
11
09-16-2009 07:22 PM
eFDeeeX
Cargo
59
01-31-2008 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices