Economic Impacts of Iran War
#1721
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 288
From: 737 FO
I think you’re reading way too much into his strategy. He does art of the deal style stuff where he says something insane and over the top to get a reaction. IMO, he desperately wants out of this and won’t resume hostilities unless Iran escalates in a big way. His antics are funny when he’s going after Chuck Schumer or Liz Warren, but in a hot war, against an actual opponent, with very little buy in from our allies, it’s tiring and not funny.
#1722
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 286
Likes: 187
I think you’re reading way too much into his strategy. He does art of the deal style stuff where he says something insane and over the top to get a reaction. IMO, he desperately wants out of this and won’t resume hostilities unless Iran escalates in a big way. His antics are funny when he’s going after Chuck Schumer or Liz Warren, but in a hot war, against an actual opponent, with very little buy in from our allies, it’s tiring and not funny.
Here's part of the deal about Trump wrt to Hormuz: the possibility is very real/likely that he's actually trying to keep it closed as long as possible. Every war game run by pentagon nerds last several decades has come to the conclusion that IRGC would close it and would be able to keep it closed indefinitely with minimal resources. So why would you want to attack Iran directly unless keeping the straight closed benefitted you.... that's why he blockaded as soon as they set up their toll booth.
Maybe it's tiring to you because it doesn't make sense to you and you can't see the play or even imagine that there is one.
I do not agree with the actions, nor do I agree with the rhetoric/antics, but there's clearly leverage being applied here, and keeping it closed is part of it while hinting at a looming peace deal everytime the treasury yield hits 4.4%.
Also, he's very clearly treating the NATO allies like children, just like he is with California, and letting them stick their climate change fear fork into the outlet so they can feel the shock of the stupid things they do.
#1723
Who said we should murder a few million? The area along Hormuz is sparsely populated, and by now mostly by combatants. Announce your intention, give everybody 48 hours to get inland and take out the remaining weapon sites with airbursts. Repeat as necessary until Iran recognizes the internationally recognized right of passage.
#1724
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 288
From: 737 FO
Who said we should murder a few million? The area along Hormuz is sparsely populated, and by now mostly by combatants. Announce your intention, give everybody 48 hours to get inland and take out the remaining weapon sites with airbursts. Repeat as necessary until Iran recognizes the internationally recognized right of passage.
#1725
Or maybe you're not reading into it at all.
Here's part of the deal about Trump wrt to Hormuz: the possibility is very real/likely that he's actually trying to keep it closed as long as possible. Every war game run by pentagon nerds last several decades has come to the conclusion that IRGC would close it and would be able to keep it closed indefinitely with minimal resources. So why would you want to attack Iran directly unless keeping the straight closed benefitted you.... that's why he blockaded as soon as they set up their toll booth.
Maybe it's tiring to you because it doesn't make sense to you and you can't see the play or even imagine that there is one.
I do not agree with the actions, nor do I agree with the rhetoric/antics, but there's clearly leverage being applied here, and keeping it closed is part of it while hinting at a looming peace deal everytime the treasury yield hits 4.4%.
Also, he's very clearly treating the NATO allies like children, just like he is with California, and letting them stick their climate change fear fork into the outlet so they can feel the shock of the stupid things they do.
Here's part of the deal about Trump wrt to Hormuz: the possibility is very real/likely that he's actually trying to keep it closed as long as possible. Every war game run by pentagon nerds last several decades has come to the conclusion that IRGC would close it and would be able to keep it closed indefinitely with minimal resources. So why would you want to attack Iran directly unless keeping the straight closed benefitted you.... that's why he blockaded as soon as they set up their toll booth.
Maybe it's tiring to you because it doesn't make sense to you and you can't see the play or even imagine that there is one.
I do not agree with the actions, nor do I agree with the rhetoric/antics, but there's clearly leverage being applied here, and keeping it closed is part of it while hinting at a looming peace deal everytime the treasury yield hits 4.4%.
Also, he's very clearly treating the NATO allies like children, just like he is with California, and letting them stick their climate change fear fork into the outlet so they can feel the shock of the stupid things they do.
#1727
#1728
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 286
Likes: 187
I think whether or not he is an idiotic petulant child or not is rather irrelevant, because if he is, those attributes are therefore useful and valuable to his economic situation, and if he's not, then he's not, AND he's got significant percentage of the world duped.
Modern day Germany certainly does not act rationally. They are literally trying to commit economic and sovereign suicide.
Last edited by Freds Ex; 05-08-2026 at 02:56 PM.
#1729
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 286
Likes: 187
Who said we should murder a few million? The area along Hormuz is sparsely populated, and by now mostly by combatants. Announce your intention, give everybody 48 hours to get inland and take out the remaining weapon sites with airbursts. Repeat as necessary until Iran recognizes the internationally recognized right of passage.
#1730
This isn’t that hard. They fire a few rockets & damage a few tankers. Then the people who own and insure said tankers stop sailing through that particular body of water because the risk is just too high when you consider the extent of their investment. A few ships went through because either they a) coordinated with & probably paid the Iranians, or b) thought the warring parties were actually serious about a “ceasefire” (they weren’t). To sum it up, Iran can hold significant sway over the strait, even if they’ve been reduced to a limited number of crude weapons.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



