Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Economic Impacts of Iran War >

Economic Impacts of Iran War

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Economic Impacts of Iran War

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2026 | 05:56 AM
  #721  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Default

Would the world be safer or less safe with the Mullahs having nukes? Since they took over during Carter, have they made any attempts at peace in the Middle East? Have they supported, sponsored, directed terrorism(attacks) on US interests throughout the ME, Europe and anywhere else they could? Have you talked to any Iranians that fled Iran? These *******s needed to be obliterated 50 years ago.



Originally Posted by Hubcapped
I guess risking my life in a pointy jet for 11 years doesn’t count towards my patriotism if im a little sus of the “strategery” of this whole endeavor…….maybe i should tweet out swear words and threaten war crimes to show my allegiance
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 06:09 AM
  #722  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Lowslung
Problem is, whether he was serious or not, that kind of bluster from any head of state is, in fact, unhinged. Yet the people who surround POTUS will never outrightly tell him that because they’d get fired. The “friendly” media outlets immediately find some way to spin it that says “this isn’t as bad as it sounds….in fact, it’s brilliant….4D chess and such. And the base eagerly eats it all up. A shocking percentage of our countrymen have seemingly lost the ability to identify the absurd.
Yes it’s gambling. And they’re letting a very short timer bet a damn fine farm he doesn’t own.
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 06:11 AM
  #723  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 217
Likes: 218
Default

Originally Posted by Ice Bear
I mean, he kidnapped the Venezuelan Head of State. He started a war with Iran. He assassinated the Ayatollah. There are many, many other things we could get into – is it really so unbelievable, with as many Yes Men as he has around him, that he'd push the button?
Were those leaders you looked up to?
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 06:25 AM
  #724  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 491
Likes: 289
Default

Originally Posted by NERD
Would the world be safer or less safe with the Mullahs having nukes? Since they took over during Carter, have they made any attempts at peace in the Middle East? Have they supported, sponsored, directed terrorism(attacks) on US interests throughout the ME, Europe and anywhere else they could? Have you talked to any Iranians that fled Iran? These *******s needed to be obliterated 50 years ago.
Please explain to us how the Gulf States, the Iranian people, and world oil markets are going to be better off. We have decapitated the Iranian leadership, only to see a head grow back that will be just as radical, if not more so.

We have given Iran the opportunity to demonstrate that they can, in fact, effectively close the Straight of Hormuz, even in a severely weakened state. We have doubled or tripled (depending on who you talk to) Iranian oil revenues vs pre-war. The Iranians may yet try and charge tolls for traffic passing through the straight. They have not, and most likely will not agree to a nuclear inspection regime on the ground. Do you think some of their newfound revenues just might be used to restart their nuclear program? That money will certainly be used to replenish their stocks of missiles, drones, and mines.

We have demonstrated to Iran & every other rogue nation on the planet that it is in their best interest to develop nuclear weapons as quickly as possible, lest their leadership suffer the same fate as the Ayatollah, or Maduro, or whoever we decide we don’t like this week. The worst possible outcome here was allowing the regime in Iran to survive and rebuild which is exactly the direction we are headed.

The regime in Iran was never going to collapse à la Venezuela & the American people were never going to have the stomach for actual regime change in Iran. I guarantee you that at least some of the president’s advisors know this. If we value our way of life, we should start insisting that he listen to them.
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 06:36 AM
  #725  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Lowslung
So now it’s the other side’s turn to be reckless with the country?.
No, fix bound to fail. I believe in no party. No deity. But that’s just one cowboy talking cowchit. The vice is elected for a reason. If he’s ever going to step out from behind a rather large, looming shadow this might not be the worst moment.

Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 06:51 AM
  #726  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 212
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

Well this thread is all over the place.

A good book about "victor's justice" is "Nuremberg, The Last Battle" by David Irving.

The general theme is that very few of the crimes prosecuted at Nuremberg wouldn't have also been easily and equally applied to the victors.

---------

One of the better discussions about the tension between the average soldier's political obligation vs their own morality is in Shakespeare's Henry V when King Henry disguises himself and talks to the common trooper about who is ultimately responsible for the death and destruction they're inflicting on everyone around them.

The Kenneth Branagh movie adaptation is excellent, but I can't find that clip.


Is the cause just? Should the average soldier even care? If it is not just, doesn't the sin lie upon the king's head, because it's the soldier's duty to follow the king?

This one is pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3Gh_Nfls20
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 07:35 AM
  #727  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
He did not "kidnap" the Venezuelan Head of State. He arrested an illegitimate dictator.
This is correct. The guy objectively lost a legit election and then hijacked the government.

I don't necessarily think it was a great idea going in there in force, but the US simply arrested a narco boss, not a "head of state".

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
He did not start the war with Iran. He set out to finish it.... on our terms.
Also correct. This is chapter four or five of the Oct 7 war, which was actually started by Iran (the proxies don't wipe even their arses without permission from the guys in Tehran).

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
And yes, it's not just unbelievable that he'd "push the button" - it's ridiculous. I truly wish you people would drop the drama class hysterics and theatrics and get serious, normal, pragmatic, and patriotic.
I tend to think he wouldn't. I also tend to think the system would intervene. The "button" isn't wired up directly to nuclear missiles, it's just a communication system. There are people in the process.

But it's possible if he perhaps pre-briefed key civilian and military leaders and convinced them that it was a good idea, or at least not too bad of an idea, they might follow orders. For military targets only, nobody is going along with counter-value strikes that would clearly be war crimes under the circumstances.
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 07:40 AM
  #728  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Hubcapped
well the vice just went to Hungary to endorse a verified russian puppet leader. So at least we have that going for us……..

at this point all we can do is laugh at this circus
Don’t I know it. Pilots are better than most at recognizing the irregular. As life under the big top goes, this one gets 5x5 for crossing the ropes. Like when the white tiger ate Roy.


Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 09:10 AM
  #729  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 286
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This is correct. The guy objectively lost a legit election and then hijacked the government.

I don't necessarily think it was a great idea going in there in force, but the US simply arrested a narco boss, not a "head of state".
What is a head of state, if not the person who is in charge the state (whether by consent or by force)?



Originally Posted by rickair7777
Also correct. This is chapter four or five of the Oct 7 war, which was actually started by Iran (the proxies don't wipe even their arses without permission from the guys in Tehran).
Oct 7 was started by Hamas (the group funded and backstopped by IL via Qatar).
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 10:00 AM
  #730  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 185
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
This is chapter four or five of the Oct 7 war,
The Oct 7th War? Do tell.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
3
01-12-2009 07:31 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
0
12-05-2008 08:27 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
11-25-2008 03:28 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
10-26-2008 08:48 PM
robthree
Regional
13
09-01-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices