Economic Impacts of Iran War
#721
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 66
Would the world be safer or less safe with the Mullahs having nukes? Since they took over during Carter, have they made any attempts at peace in the Middle East? Have they supported, sponsored, directed terrorism(attacks) on US interests throughout the ME, Europe and anywhere else they could? Have you talked to any Iranians that fled Iran? These *******s needed to be obliterated 50 years ago.
#722
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
Problem is, whether he was serious or not, that kind of bluster from any head of state is, in fact, unhinged. Yet the people who surround POTUS will never outrightly tell him that because they’d get fired. The “friendly” media outlets immediately find some way to spin it that says “this isn’t as bad as it sounds….in fact, it’s brilliant….4D chess and such. And the base eagerly eats it all up. A shocking percentage of our countrymen have seemingly lost the ability to identify the absurd.
#723
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 217
Likes: 218
Were those leaders you looked up to?
#724
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 491
Likes: 289
Would the world be safer or less safe with the Mullahs having nukes? Since they took over during Carter, have they made any attempts at peace in the Middle East? Have they supported, sponsored, directed terrorism(attacks) on US interests throughout the ME, Europe and anywhere else they could? Have you talked to any Iranians that fled Iran? These *******s needed to be obliterated 50 years ago.
We have given Iran the opportunity to demonstrate that they can, in fact, effectively close the Straight of Hormuz, even in a severely weakened state. We have doubled or tripled (depending on who you talk to) Iranian oil revenues vs pre-war. The Iranians may yet try and charge tolls for traffic passing through the straight. They have not, and most likely will not agree to a nuclear inspection regime on the ground. Do you think some of their newfound revenues just might be used to restart their nuclear program? That money will certainly be used to replenish their stocks of missiles, drones, and mines.
We have demonstrated to Iran & every other rogue nation on the planet that it is in their best interest to develop nuclear weapons as quickly as possible, lest their leadership suffer the same fate as the Ayatollah, or Maduro, or whoever we decide we don’t like this week. The worst possible outcome here was allowing the regime in Iran to survive and rebuild which is exactly the direction we are headed.
The regime in Iran was never going to collapse à la Venezuela & the American people were never going to have the stomach for actual regime change in Iran. I guarantee you that at least some of the president’s advisors know this. If we value our way of life, we should start insisting that he listen to them.
#725
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
No, fix bound to fail. I believe in no party. No deity. But that’s just one cowboy talking cowchit. The vice is elected for a reason. If he’s ever going to step out from behind a rather large, looming shadow this might not be the worst moment.
#726
Well this thread is all over the place.
A good book about "victor's justice" is "Nuremberg, The Last Battle" by David Irving.
The general theme is that very few of the crimes prosecuted at Nuremberg wouldn't have also been easily and equally applied to the victors.
---------
One of the better discussions about the tension between the average soldier's political obligation vs their own morality is in Shakespeare's Henry V when King Henry disguises himself and talks to the common trooper about who is ultimately responsible for the death and destruction they're inflicting on everyone around them.
The Kenneth Branagh movie adaptation is excellent, but I can't find that clip.
Is the cause just? Should the average soldier even care? If it is not just, doesn't the sin lie upon the king's head, because it's the soldier's duty to follow the king?
This one is pretty good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3Gh_Nfls20
A good book about "victor's justice" is "Nuremberg, The Last Battle" by David Irving.
The general theme is that very few of the crimes prosecuted at Nuremberg wouldn't have also been easily and equally applied to the victors.
---------
One of the better discussions about the tension between the average soldier's political obligation vs their own morality is in Shakespeare's Henry V when King Henry disguises himself and talks to the common trooper about who is ultimately responsible for the death and destruction they're inflicting on everyone around them.
The Kenneth Branagh movie adaptation is excellent, but I can't find that clip.
Is the cause just? Should the average soldier even care? If it is not just, doesn't the sin lie upon the king's head, because it's the soldier's duty to follow the king?
This one is pretty good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3Gh_Nfls20
#727
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I don't necessarily think it was a great idea going in there in force, but the US simply arrested a narco boss, not a "head of state".
But it's possible if he perhaps pre-briefed key civilian and military leaders and convinced them that it was a good idea, or at least not too bad of an idea, they might follow orders. For military targets only, nobody is going along with counter-value strikes that would clearly be war crimes under the circumstances.
#728
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
#729
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2024
Posts: 286
Likes: 187
Oct 7 was started by Hamas (the group funded and backstopped by IL via Qatar).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



