Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Economic Impacts of Iran War >

Economic Impacts of Iran War


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Economic Impacts of Iran War

Old 03-19-2026 | 10:21 AM
  #221  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 151
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The houthis shot a lot of missiles after the beginning of this war, which was Oct 7. They are in a position to use IR supplied ASCMs and drones against shipping in the Bab and Red Sea. They also attempted to shoot US naval vessels, including a CVN.



Of course not, how many times do I have to say I was not in favor of this action.

But IR was objectively killing Americans overseas, and a threat to the global (oil) economy which ultimately needed to be dealt with. The question was how, and to what degree the US needed to be involved. I was good with the first strikes against the IR nuke facilities, IL was 100% going to do that anyway and kick up the hornet's nest.
Unfortunately to accept a lot of the arguments you make you have to believe what is being said by Hedgspeth and Trump. These are the same people that claimed the war was over, we have already won, the Iranian military is “obliterated” and that the strait is open expect for the shooting.

If all of that what they had claimed is true then why are the straits closed and Iran shooting and hitting high value targets daily.

I don’t believe we have won. Don’t believe anything that is said from the administration at the point as the lies to truth ratio has been exceeded on a “scale never seen before” to borrow a favorite phrase.

At the end of the day our economy, our retirement accounts and our jobs hang in the balance from the decisions of the past three weeks. I personally have very little optimism based on the facts.
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 11:23 AM
  #222  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Midsomer
Unfortunately to accept a lot of the arguments you make you have to believe what is being said by Hedgspeth and Trump. These are the same people that claimed the war was over, we have already won, the Iranian military is “obliterated” and that the strait is open expect for the shooting.

If all of that what they had claimed is true then why are the straits closed and Iran shooting and hitting high value targets daily.

I don’t believe we have won. Don’t believe anything that is said from the administration at the point as the lies to truth ratio has been exceeded on a “scale never seen before” to borrow a favorite phrase.

At the end of the day our economy, our retirement accounts and our jobs hang in the balance from the decisions of the past three weeks. I personally have very little optimism based on the facts.
Absolutely nothing I said was based on anything those two said. I rarely bother to listen to them (or their counterparts on the other side) because I already know what they're going to say anyhow.

Example, Trump just announced "No Boots on Ground".

I fully expected that because a significant % of his base does not care for foreign entanglements. Also possible that he's actually gearing up for raids and might be hoping to lull IR into complacency on that threat vector. He's done that kind of thing.

I'm not optimistic about profit sharing for 2026. But there's a decent chance this whole thing will be a net positive long-term, I'm intimately familiar with the strategic and tactical capabilities of IR, and our plan to delete most of them. The region will probably be more stable, with less proxy-induced disruption after the dust settles. There's just no way that doesn't math out... capabilities gone, economic prospects severely impaired. They simply cannot reconstitute to their previous position on anything short of a very long-term timeline.
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 11:41 AM
  #223  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 197
Likes: 107
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Absolutely nothing I said was based on anything those two said. I rarely bother to listen to them (or their counterparts on the other side) because I already know what they're going to say anyhow.

Example, Trump just announced "No Boots on Ground".

I fully expected that because a significant % of his base does not care for foreign entanglements. Also possible that he's actually gearing up for raids and might be hoping to lull IR into complacency on that threat vector. He's done that kind of thing.
It doesn’t really matter if a significant percentage of his base is against foreign engagements. They will change their mindset based on what the administration said/did last. It doesn’t matter what is said or steps actually taken. An example is your “boots on the ground” comment. He said that straight up but you are already willing to look past it. Not trying to pick on you, just making the point because you’re smart enough to know that this will lead to ground troops in the theater.

Integrity is a virtue for both the speaker AND listener.

This is well on track to put the world into a recession but the war was won in the first hour.

It’s a very interesting case study with regards to sociology but also sad as well.

Last edited by SampsonSimpson; 03-19-2026 at 12:04 PM.
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 12:03 PM
  #224  
rickair7777's Avatar
Thread Starter
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SampsonSimpson
It doesn’t really matter if a significant percentage of his base is against foreign engagements. They will change their mindset based on what the administration said/did last. It doesn’t matter what is said or steps actually taken. An example is your “boots on the ground” comment. He said that straight up but you are already willing to look past it. Not trying to pick on you, just making the point because you’re smart enough to know that this will lead to ground troops in the theater.
I'm not looking past anything because I'm not (and never have been) a fan boy. So I don't need to rationalize. I also do not have TDS, so I can analyze the administration's behavior based on the merits.

I'm extremely opposed to any OIF/OEF style BoG. As is any rational person with an understanding of the nature of this problem set.

SOF and raids is somewhere between likely and inevitable due to again the nature of the problem set. I'll be surprised if none of that happens
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 12:15 PM
  #225  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 22
Likes: 14
Default

Dont worry everyone! The self appointed chairman of the Board of Peace will bring stability back to the region through strategic..erm... excursions
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 12:28 PM
  #226  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 512
Likes: 85
Default

The Pentagon is asking for an additional $200 billion for the war. I thought it was announced that we already won this thing after the first few days? Also where is this money coming from? The first year of this administration was all about cutting spending and cutting programs, departments and increasing efficiency. Now we're okay just spending more on foreign wars?

(This is not a partisan statement, this is a direct question from an upset American who is again seeing his tax dollars burned on a Middle East conflict while so much is needed here at home). We were promised no new conflicts, what gives?
Old 03-19-2026 | 12:54 PM
  #227  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 621
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I'm sure you full-throated defended Joe because he was voted on by "the people.". I'm sure you never chose to listen to police or military or Intel experts over an elected representative
Well the left overly uses the swap already. So there is no need to defend Joe. If Joe were putting his name on it I’d have more respect but they always hide, and Trump isn’t hiding.

ATF trying to take guns, OSHA enforcing COVID mask, EPA trying to govern carbon.

They love for the swamp to have all the authority then they run the swamp as they see fit. Then claim it’s authentic and not politics.

Joe gets no defense for always hiding behind some alphabet.
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 01:24 PM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,520
Likes: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
Well the left overly uses the swap already. So there is no need to defend Joe. If Joe were putting his name on it I’d have more respect but they always hide, and Trump isn’t hiding.

ATF trying to take guns, OSHA enforcing COVID mask, EPA trying to govern carbon.

They love for the swamp to have all the authority then they run the swamp as they see fit. Then claim it’s authentic and not politics.

Joe gets no defense for always hiding behind some alphabet.
Ah, so.you only hide behind unquestioning allegiance to elected officials only when you personally have voted for them. Got it.
Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 02:06 PM
  #229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,488
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by Midsomer
I don’t believe we have won. Don’t believe anything that is said from the administration at the point as the lies to truth ratio has been exceeded on a “scale never seen before” to borrow a favorite phrase.

At the end of the day our economy, our retirement accounts and our jobs hang in the balance from the decisions of the past three weeks. I personally have very little optimism based on the facts.
There’s got to exist mitigating factors but any lag won’t last long. Markets rise & fall on earnings. Regardless, transport is unlikely to avoid a turbulent shaking. No way to stay optimistic on supply forecasts.

Otoh, sub torping a frigate. Can you imagine the look on their faces as the shoot order was received. A thing like that, wow.


Reply
Old 03-19-2026 | 02:17 PM
  #230  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Absolutely nothing I said was based on anything those two said. I rarely bother to listen to them (or their counterparts on the other side) because I already know what they're going to say anyhow.

Example, Trump just announced "No Boots on Ground".
And when they land on Kharg Island, and tell you that that's not "the ground," will you believe them?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
3
01-12-2009 07:31 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
0
12-05-2008 08:27 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
11-25-2008 03:28 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
10-26-2008 08:48 PM
robthree
Regional
13
09-01-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices