Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Climb: Fast, or steep. TW/HW >

Climb: Fast, or steep. TW/HW

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Climb: Fast, or steep. TW/HW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2026 | 06:48 PM
  #81  
.
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 674
Default

I'll worry about fuel efficiency when I don't spend hours each month getting my pay uneffed, or sit out burning 3500pph ($1200+ an hour) because they didn't want to staff ground side properly amd no wing walkers. (Normal ops, not irop/weather/super early or late arrival)
Reply
Old 04-05-2026 | 05:39 PM
  #82  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 197
Likes: 107
Default

Originally Posted by CX500T
I'll worry about fuel efficiency when I don't spend hours each month getting my pay uneffed, or sit out burning 3500pph ($1200+ an hour) because they didn't want to staff ground side properly amd no wing walkers. (Normal ops, not irop/weather/super early or late arrival)
Yeah, I think the word you’re looking for is DILLIGAF. You and me both brother.
Reply
Old 04-05-2026 | 05:46 PM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 215
Likes: 218
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
~1600 pounds round trip extra was burned. Transcon redeye. Saved four mins each leg. Why are we still talking about this. You're allowed to be wrong lol.




Safe. Comfortable. On time. Efficient. In that order.

If being on time costs 1000 lbs is it worth it in every scenario? AA used to file at FL260-270 just to max your TAS if flight plan was 1 min longer than historical. You push early and have a quick taxi, and arrive 15 mins early, but burn 1000 lbs more? Especially when going to the outstation at 11pm. Stupid. BTW they completely stopped that practice when I sent in some example completed flights and how much gas was saved while still arriving early.
You sound like a joy to fly with on go home leg or trying to catch a commute, your FOs are probably rolling their eyes as you brag to them how safe and comfortable your flights are as you set the speed like a grandpa. Your time estimate is wrong. Rough estimate each .1 mach is 1 minute per hour, so 5 to 6 minutes on a Transcon. The difference between .76 and .80 is 24 minutes.

I'm all for flying the cost index and saving fuel......but go home leg is a different Animal, especially when I just spent 3 or 4 days going through this companies ****ed up operations.
Reply
Old 04-05-2026 | 06:38 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 334
Default

Originally Posted by AAdvocate
You sound like a joy to fly with on go home leg or trying to catch a commute, your FOs are probably rolling their eyes as you brag to them how safe and comfortable your flights are as you set the speed like a grandpa. Your time estimate is wrong. Rough estimate each .1 mach is 1 minute per hour, so 5 to 6 minutes on a Transcon. The difference between .76 and .80 is 24 minutes.

I'm all for flying the cost index and saving fuel......but go home leg is a different Animal, especially when I just spent 3 or 4 days going through this companies ****ed up operations.
den-phl, block on that is what like 3? Going 81 sure isn't efficient but feels good to save a couple minutes I guess. Like I said he saved four minutes.

If no one has a reasonable danger of missing a commute I don't go fast, gas is $5/gal. Sometimes being the adult isn't fun, who cares. You're probably going to wait for a gate anyways.

The worst was a CA I was with who taxi'd at 7 knots. Seven. They even knew I had a commute.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 05:58 PM
  #85  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 91
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
The worst was a CA I was with who taxi'd at 7 knots. Seven. They even knew I had a commute.
Based on your posts…..I strongly suspect this was intentional.
Reply
Old 04-06-2026 | 09:26 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 50
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Warhawker
Does anyone have any objective data on how much (if any) climbing steeper into a tailwind vs flying at a faster forward speed affects fuel use and time to destination? I've tried running a test on MSFS 2020, but the save system doesn't work right.

Scenario: Good tailwinds to destination, climb closer to best L/D till hitting the majority of tailwinds, then spin to max forward speed. Headwinds at cruise, climbs faster at a shallower angle.
How about using the speeds the flight manual says or the cost index you get from the company.
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 08:44 AM
  #87  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 334
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Petey7788
How about using the speeds the flight manual says or the cost index you get from the company.
Not sure it’s an airline pilot. OP referenced Flight Simulator.
Reply
Old 04-08-2026 | 01:03 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,171
Likes: 150
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Not sure it’s an airline pilot. OP referenced Flight Simulator.
This entire thread has been ridiculous lol.
Reply
Old 04-14-2026 | 01:51 AM
  #89  
sourdough44's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 716
Likes: 8
From: Left
Default

Now what about the detailed flight planning then riding the speed brakes in the descent? How’s that factored in to energy management??
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sliceback
American
34
03-08-2016 10:15 AM
oicur12
Military
14
03-20-2014 08:37 AM
ilikeplanes
Flight Schools and Training
10
11-14-2007 06:33 PM
BigPropz
Regional
17
07-09-2007 12:49 PM
av8r4aa
Major
56
12-04-2006 06:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices