Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DAL In-House Union?

Old 02-12-2009 | 11:34 AM
  #31  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

I am glad that you see it this way Check.
I just do not get how people can see it any other way.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 11:45 AM
  #32  
Fly4hire's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Left, left, left right left....
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
That argument doesn't work for me. That's DALPA spin.
Those six seats are critical because they are on the BIGGER airframes.
If it was putting 6 more seats on 50 or 70 seaters then that would be one thing, but this is allowing 26 more 76 seat airplanes.

26 additional 76 seat airplanes are now allowed under our scope clause.
It's far worse than that - ~10 of the newly allowed 76 seat CRJ900's were not yet delivered. By digging in we could have forced those airframes to be configured with 70 seats making that airframe much less economically viable - we ****ed some serious leverage away.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 11:46 AM
  #33  
TheDashRocks's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 CA Furloughed
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
There is no solution that does not erode mainline flying in either quantity or pay in the name of "fair".

Feeder carriers need their own union, Mainline theirs.
Two seperate unions zealously pursuing their own narrow interests will ultimately serve the interests of the employers more than the pilots. It will be whipsaw on a grand scale.

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
...no one has ever shown me the alchemy of how it will work - the career progression at the regional involves taking it out of the growth of the mainline unless you define career progression as moving up to the mainline. Most of the younger dudes want that, however the senior pilots controlling the regional MEC's are lifers and want that growth and career progression in the form of more and larger airplanes at their regional.
I do define career progression for regional pilots as moving to the majors. I did not attend Hogwarts, but I will take a stab at some alchemy.

Major pilot groups and their affiliated regional pilot groups should negotiate common agreements with employers. These agreements should allow for true "flow up" and "flow back", rigid scope clauses with the line at 70 seat jets and the placement of regional pilots on major seniority lists. Pay rates for CL70/90/100 and E170/190 sized aircraft should be set between current regional and major pay rates with these aircraft flown by mainline pilots.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 11:49 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Default

Originally Posted by FedElta
My last Alpa carrier had member ratification for all ta's, loa's, and miscellaneous agreements with the company. That would have prevented the last grievance settlement at Delta without discussion and member vote......can member ratification be adopted at Delta?
I agree completely. If a vote by the members were required for all LOA's we would be discussing a PROPOSED LOA and not a SIGNED LOA. Big difference.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 12:13 PM
  #35  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

And it would have never passed.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 12:20 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Default

Exactly So what we need to be discussing is: instead of replacing members of the LEC/MEC (or the entire union for that matter), we need to change the DALPA by-laws to require a vote by the members to ratify any LOA's. Therefore, it wouldn't matter what kind of agreements they reach with the company; if the pilots don't like them, they don't get passed.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 12:33 PM
  #37  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

I smell a resolution at an upcoming LEC meeting.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 02:06 PM
  #38  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by Dash8widget
Exactly So what we need to be discussing is: instead of replacing members of the LEC/MEC (or the entire union for that matter), we need to change the DALPA by-laws to require a vote by the members to ratify any LOA's. Therefore, it wouldn't matter what kind of agreements they reach with the company; if the pilots don't like them, they don't get passed.
Nice idea but wouldn't have mattered in this instance. This was a grievance resolution not a LOA, correct? The GC came up with the solution and the MEC Chair approved it. Do you want a MEMRAT for every decision the MEC makes? That is a recipe for anarchy.
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 02:08 PM
  #39  
FlyingViking's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: B-7ER JFK
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I smell a resolution at an upcoming LEC meeting.
But maybe it is time to get solutions in stead of resolutions? Something that very well can be obtained by DCU (Delta Crew Union). FA's and Pilots combined we would be a pretty significant group fighting for the best outcome for our company, our crewmembers, and our benefits / compensations..

Just a thought..
Reply
Old 02-12-2009 | 02:33 PM
  #40  
Rhino Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: 73N CA
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingViking
But maybe it is time to get solutions in stead of resolutions? Something that very well can be obtained by DCU (Delta Crew Union). FA's and Pilots combined we would be a pretty significant group fighting for the best outcome for our company, our crewmembers, and our benefits / compensations..

Just a thought..
Interesting Viking. I was just thinking the same thing earlier. If we were to form our own union, wouldn't it be a good idea to offer membership in the new union to our Flight Attendants? Now that would be a voice of roughly 25,000. What are the benefits, downsides, and limitations?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boogie Nights
Union Talk
22
04-14-2009 09:10 PM
vagabond
Union Talk
2
01-15-2009 11:15 PM
acl65pilot
Major
36
10-29-2008 06:29 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
10-02-2008 09:45 AM
jungle
Money Talk
2
08-25-2008 10:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices