CAL System Bid
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
I dont think this flying is going to the xjt rjs because we are being cut back almost double the % reduction in September block hours. The CHQ crj's are slowly leaving and will be totally gone by early 2010, the new q400's arent coming until end of summer 2010 and are supposedly going to be replacing a lot of the saab and rj routes down in IAH, and Commutair is apparently staying pretty much status quo into the fall.
What is the total reduction in block hours on the 73 system wide?
I am hoping this is just a management scare tactic that has the opposite affect and is used as ammo for the union. I dont think anybody needs reminding that scope is protecting your job but this just might scare the really dense individuals into getting educated on the subject.
What is the total reduction in block hours on the 73 system wide?
I am hoping this is just a management scare tactic that has the opposite affect and is used as ammo for the union. I dont think anybody needs reminding that scope is protecting your job but this just might scare the really dense individuals into getting educated on the subject.
#22
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
I dont think this flying is going to the xjt rjs because we are being cut back almost double the % reduction in September block hours. The CHQ crj's are slowly leaving and will be totally gone by early 2010, the new q400's arent coming until end of summer 2010 and are supposedly going to be replacing a lot of the saab and rj routes down in IAH, and Commutair is apparently staying pretty much status quo into the fall.
What is the total reduction in block hours on the 73 system wide?
I am hoping this is just a management scare tactic that has the opposite affect and is used as ammo for the union. I dont think anybody needs reminding that scope is protecting your job but this just might scare the really dense individuals into getting educated on the subject.
What is the total reduction in block hours on the 73 system wide?
I am hoping this is just a management scare tactic that has the opposite affect and is used as ammo for the union. I dont think anybody needs reminding that scope is protecting your job but this just might scare the really dense individuals into getting educated on the subject.
Looking at Freddy's Flt Ops Update (which I normally mark return to sender) for Aug'09, it states:
Fall (Sep-Dec) 2008 flying hrs were 257K hours
vs
Fall (Sep-Dec) 2009 flying hrs are projected 247K hours
....= 3.7% reduction.....the above pertains to "Crew Block Hours".
With a good amount of reductions in the NE, it sure seems like a rather 'large' amount for 'just' a simple 3.7% reduction. About 2/3's of the entire update had lots of 'fuzzy' math. All in all, I do agree there is more to this being just simple reductions.
Last edited by SoCalGuy; 08-18-2009 at 05:40 PM.
#24
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
757Driver....what's this about your slant on a law suit concerning the topic?? Do explain your take. I agree, it all smells like a 'big steamer'.
#25
#26
Keep Calm Chive ON
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
#27
From my understanding EWR has A LOT of commuters. That said, They are now increasing the number of commuters in the system since there are pilots getting reduced to IAH that actually can drive to work in EWR. Plus replacing routes with RJ's/Props. There's only one more way to really mess with the pilot group and our contract is already dog$#!t. Sounds to me like management is really trying to break us and not realizing that they are only fueling the fire of unity. FUPM
#28
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Likes: 0
And we're also ADDING TWO new CP's while cutting the bases to the core? That really makes sense. The B737's had almost 580 CA's last year and they are reducing them to 292? I haven't had but 10-15 seats in TOTAL empty in my last 15 pairings or so. We are paying a HUGE amount of bumping/oversold compensation too. Wow.........worst to first and back again in record time. Sad............
#29
#30
Adding two CPs may be necessary just to handle the logistics of all of the hotel rooms and transportation that will be needed to staff a portion of EWR out of IAH. If management knows this is going to be expensive on the front side, imagine how much money they are greedily thinking they will save on the back side "once they bust the union". The most money I'd ever made was when out of base flying was done without TDY staffing. Add 6 hours of round trip DH to every pairing you fly and you may have a hard time spending all the money. There are daily pairings being built that DH IAH pilots on both ends of a EWR-Europe trip now. Even at paltry CAL FO pay rates it adds up.
This decision needs to be challenged in court, in a jurisdiction other than Houston TX, if for no other reason than to test how the courts rule on union busting under the Obama administration.
This decision needs to be challenged in court, in a jurisdiction other than Houston TX, if for no other reason than to test how the courts rule on union busting under the Obama administration.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



