Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
CVR Bill in Congress. NOT GOOD !! >

CVR Bill in Congress. NOT GOOD !!

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

CVR Bill in Congress. NOT GOOD !!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2009, 11:00 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by deltabound View Post
This story makes no sense... To wit: no matter what Congress passes, labor can still negotiate to not allow the company to use CVR or FDR data to punish/monitor performance...
I'm not sure you're right. If there is a new law that bans such agreements, inlcuding those already in place, you can't... re-negotiate an illegal agreement. Like it or not, Congress matters, and laws carry the force... of law.

I think this story is trying to say that Congress wants the FAA to randomly sample CVR's and FDR's for improper pilot procedure. While this certainly would SUCK, I'd have to say, get used to the idea.
You can get used to the idea of periodic checkrides, medicals, and line checks, but it's pretty hard to conceive this group accepting monitoring devices. We have CVR's and FDR for the prupose of making the skies safer, and they work. Very well. Using them for other purposes, and turning them over to HR, would be disastrous. Not only would we become disfunctional paranoids, but the airlines would also be forced to use the data, and I don't think they want to do that. Sure, there is a chief pilot or two that dreams about this stuff at night, but most legal or HR departments would probably shiver at the thought. For starters, every one of your mistakes they failed to punish for, they would be accountable for. And if they punished you for every mistake, and spent the time reviewing your actions, there would be no pilot left that's fit for duty, since we are in an error-intolerant industry, not an error-free industry.

On the flip side, you would have thousands of unemployed pilots available to review flights by the few pilots yet to be fired. It would build into a feverd pitch, with the last flying pilot being reviewed several hundred thousand times, by the remaining, non-flying, "pilots".

So I'm not getting used to that idea, and neither should you.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:16 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Satan's Camaro
Posts: 397
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
I'm not sure you're right. If there is a new law that bans such agreements, inlcuding those already in place, you can't... re-negotiate an illegal agreement. Like it or not, Congress matters, and laws carry the force... of law.



You can get used to the idea of periodic checkrides, medicals, and line checks, but it's pretty hard to conceive this group accepting monitoring devices. We have CVR's and FDR for the prupose of making the skies safer, and they work. Very well. Using them for other purposes, and turning them over to HR, would be disastrous. Not only would we become disfunctional paranoids, but the airlines would also be forced to use the data, and I don't think they want to do that. Sure, there is a chief pilot or two that dreams about this stuff at night, but most legal or HR departments would probably shiver at the thought. For starters, every one of your mistakes they failed to punish for, they would be accountable for. And if they punished you for every mistake, and spent the time reviewing your actions, there would be no pilot left that's fit for duty, since we are in an error-intolerant industry, not an error-free industry.

On the flip side, you would have thousands of unemployed pilots available to review flights by the few pilots yet to be fired. It would build into a feverd pitch, with the last flying pilot being reviewed several hundred thousand times, by the remaining, non-flying, "pilots".

So I'm not getting used to that idea, and neither should you.
Not to mention all the legitimate claims by pilots who could say "I was fired for this, but this other pilot wasn't." There would be a staggering amount of information available for pilots to start wrongful termination suits.
boilerpilot is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:21 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaPaySoon View Post
WHAT?!

This will never, ever see the light of day. I hope you're kidding. It hasn't even left the guy's office.
Yes, I am kidding.

I'm referencing the last piece of asinine legislation that much to my bewilderment was supported fully and completely by ALPA, to the detriment of most of its members.

Honestly I don't see ALPA doing anything other than fighting this, however, nothing the association does surprises me anymore.
floydbird is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:29 AM
  #24  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,518
Default

Suspension Of Service
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 11:45 AM
  #25  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Pilot Professionalism Assurance Act.... Think about that for a moment folks. This coming from a US congressman. Wow.. the arrogance of our government is staggering
That sums it up right there. Guess we should be able to record all there conversations and discipline them when they screw up. I don't think we have enough cell space. IDIOTS!!!!!
johnso29 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 12:13 PM
  #26  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,734
Default

I bet the CVR is "broken" a lot if this happens. I used to fly with a captain on the 3 holer who would pull several CBs on his way to the seat.

His reason- "If we ever crash, I'm going to make that chair warming SOB work harder to figure out what we screwed up in the 10 seconds we had to do anything."
Swedish Blender is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 12:54 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 804
Cool

We all know that there a large number of things that pilots can do to render the CAM (cockpit area microphone) useless.

This is NOT the place to discuss them.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 01:00 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8 View Post
I'm not sure you're right. If there is a new law that bans such agreements, inlcuding those already in place, you can't... re-negotiate an illegal agreement. Like it or not, Congress matters, and laws carry the force... of law.


So I'm not getting used to that idea, and neither should you.
I agree with most of what you write. Nevertheless, I think this is yet another example of an article written by a report who knows little or nothing about the industry he's covering.


That Congressional busy bodies would like to give CVR access to the FAA for spot checks isn't anything new; it's a idea that comes up from time to time.

I have a hard time believing that Congress would think it wise or necessary that private contractors (unions and airlines) should not be able to enter agreements as to what CVR data may be used for. It's micromanagement on a ridiculous scale, and I doubt that Congress even has the authority to do so.
deltabound is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 01:31 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
oasis04's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 40
Default

I believe the airline corporations will fight this as well. I can only imagine the litigators salivating over this information for suits against the airline for anything from ground delays to inflight medical emergencies and EVERYTHING in between.
I used to be a locomotive engineer and the rail roads fought off the notion of voice recorders simply to help them hide from liability in accident investigations.
I can hear it now " the pic neglected to call ramp control to get a gate so I could take a dump"

Last edited by oasis04; 11-21-2009 at 11:03 AM.
oasis04 is offline  
Old 11-20-2009, 02:12 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

The CVR in my aircraft has a CB. Our manual does not allow us to reset the CB with out MX resetting it. Anything else I can fix or find a solution to?
buddies8 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ERJ135
Cargo
50
11-22-2008 06:57 PM
DWN3GRN
Hangar Talk
15
10-14-2008 03:32 PM
Splanky
Major
4
09-12-2008 04:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices