Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2011 | 07:47 AM
  #4621  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
It's interesting how some folks seem more concerned with protecting ALPA than they are with protecting the Delta pilot's careers.
You have nailed it man! Many of the ALPA apologists on here see a career at ALPA as the better choice. Lots more money, lots more perks, no accountability and a clear path to a DC lobbying job. None of that can happen for them unless ALPA remains a huge and bloated bureaucracy. This is why they fight so hard.

Just like watching the protestors being dragged out of the Wisconsin legislature: When people see their gravy train threatened...they pull out all the stops.

Carl
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 07:48 AM
  #4622  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
DAL88, reality is that the last six year have sucked for you; since CH11. About 20% of your career.
I see the act of an independent union as selfish and self serving. It may get you something you want in the short term, maybe. I still see that as unlikely. Look no further to APA to see what happens when that process has been employed.
From your perspective, the last six years have been pretty darn good for you. You finally made it to the big leagues. The money's not great, or even what you expected when you got into the career... but, hey, at least you're finally here. You're a really good networker, and you've established quite a reputation as the great "dot connector" here on APC. Wouldn't want to do anything to rock the boat with any possibility of making things less stable and having some kind of glitch that might hamper whatever ladder you're trying to climb. How am I doing so far?

As for the APA. This is the same crap that the ALPA apologists bring up every time. I think I've been pretty clear that, while I like APA's former focus on objective, I'm not a fan of the "burn down the house" mentality. I think a combination of proactive engagement and assertively advocating that our profession be returned to its appropriate place (and a willingness to stand our ground) is the strategy that is most likely to yield results. Right now, we have the former without the latter.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
DAL88, we had a merger a JPWA that extended the contract two years. Look at the realities. We as a group voted overwhelmingly for it. I could see your point if we had a section six process or we had a JPWA with another concluded section six process before the JPWA, but we have not. There has not been one other group that has gone drastically ahead of us. Use SWAPA, fine, but the fact is that our JPWA, the last agreement that we had up for MEMRAT was done a little over a year after we exited CH11, and we had only two profitable quarters and four very unprofitable quarters leading up to that. After it was signed DAL took billions in right offs, and lost billions. We did not enter in to another concessionary agreement, and did not furlough. It may be easy to forget that, but the fact is that it could have been a lot worse.

Going forward, pray and hope that when it is our turn at the plate, UCAL and APA have had agreements that have built on ours. It makes DALPA's job of obtaining what you want that much easier. Like I have said, you are frustrated, and as I have said DPA has some great points, but fix them from within. Let DALPA do what it does best, negotiate a section six agreement. You have not even allowed that to happen. Heck we may get put in to another merger and have another type of event that we had with our last merger. Reality is that we as a company and a industry are in a different place today. It may not be that way tomorrow, but today we are. Look at the big picture and realize that your DALPA and ALPA teams are doing everything they can to get us what we want. Reality is that no that much time has passed since CH11 and we have not had the opportunity at the correct time to put the power of DALPA and ALPA to task. We are getting to that time that we will. Engage, and unify with the process. The current actions of dividing this group will hamper that process, and further enrage you. Stop it and better all of the Delta Pilot's chances of getting the most they can out of the process.
This is all a big load of crap. Sorry. We've been out of bankruptcy for almost half a decade. And yet we're still being compensated as if we are still in bankruptcy and in danger of liquidation. This is a no brainer. The right thing to do is to increase our compensation NOW to bring it to an appropriate level. SWA, as our soon to be biggest competitor in ATL, provides a decent benchmark for what the market will bear for pilots in the airline industry TODAY. This shouldn't be our ultimate objective. But it would be a good start... a partial pay restoration that would bring our average W-2's in line with the W-2's of SWA pilots. I cannot think of ANY valid reason why ALPA would not be pursuing this ASAP. Heck, we even had a couple of resolutions passed to this effect. And ALPA basically ignored them! If the company says yes, then we get a good start towards restoration. If they say no, then we know where we stand, what kind of management we're really dealing with, and how to better proceed going forward. Instead, you ask us to all put our careers and our family's financial futures in the hands of what some other pilot group may or may not do? You're going to pin all our hopes to "pattern bargaining" and how it might benefit us 2 or 3 years from now? Holy cow! What are you thinking, man?? I want the people representing me to be advocating that we are compensated appropriately and that Delta pilots fly Delta passengers. The best way for this profession to be advanced is for the largest airline pilot group to achieve restoration. This kumbaya, group hug stuff you're advocating for our entire profession is just not going to translate into real results... for the pilots. It might for ALPA, the organization/business. But not for the pilots.

Sorry for the rant. This stuff just really ****es me off, and I'm reaching the absolute end of my patience with ALPA and their crap.
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:08 AM
  #4623  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
That is a Red Herring and you know it.
He absolutely NAILED it and you know it. The only thing red is your complexion for being described so perfectly.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
ALPA and our careers are not mutually exclusive.
Of course not. But ALPA and your career at ALPA are mutually exclusive. Anything that threatens ALPA threatens your career there.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Its not about screwing you to protect ALPA,
No, it's about scamming your fellow pilots so you can further your own ALPA career.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
it is trying to make people realize that even though there are issues within ALPA it is the best mechanism to further your career.
Ah yes...those famous "issues" with ALPA. The truth is that ALPA is the best mechanism for you to further your career. I understand your panic and frustration over this.

Carl
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:11 AM
  #4624  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by dragon
I think the debate here is precisely about the part I bolded. ALPA isn't the best mechanism, its just got the longest track record.

Are they willing to change? Can they change? Like all unions, I think the folks in DC are more enamored with their personal power and the thrill they get wielding it, than actually representing those they were originally elected to represent. DC frequently forgets there is a world outside the beltway.
Really, really well said.

Carl
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:19 AM
  #4625  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
The same process that sees resolutions made only to be received and then parked never to see the light of day again? Complete obstructionism and defiance when requests to see budgets, expenditures and FPL data that is fueled by dues money are made. Then, when the requests and resolutions continue, the comunications committee which normally spews its brand of proselytism shifts gears and puts forth a blend of denials and targeted propaganda.

Finally, what about the rampant cronyism. You know something about that now as we all have seen about the most dispicable display of "its about me, not what is best for the pilots" behavior in the last committee election.
This is a result of who is elected as reps, which also elect the MEC...if we don't like it we need to change up the reps. I think the threat of DPA has forced the MEC to look inward, maybe not enough...but I just see the same type of individuals being elected under DPA. There are going to be elections, correct?

The cronyism comes right from the top of the company and moves downward...I don't know how you change that, until upper mangement changes completely nothing will change there...but DALPA can be changed by the reps. FWIW
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:35 AM
  #4626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You have nailed it man! Many of the ALPA apologists on here see a career at ALPA as the better choice. Lots more money, lots more perks, no accountability and a clear path to a DC lobbying job. None of that can happen for them unless ALPA remains a huge and bloated bureaucracy. This is why they fight so hard.

Just like watching the protestors being dragged out of the Wisconsin legislature: When people see their gravy train threatened...they pull out all the stops.

Carl
Carl, I doubt a single poster on here works for ALPA or has any plans to work for ALPA. Your statement has zero validity.
The people who would prefer to keep DALPA believe they will provide the best overall contract. Certainly DPA is not the answer. They can't even get organized enough to even meet their own time lines let alone actually try and represent the Delta pilots.
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:49 AM
  #4627  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
...Going forward, pray and hope that when it is our turn at the plate, UCAL and APA have had agreements that have built on ours. It makes DALPA's job of obtaining what you want that much easier. Like I have said, you are frustrated, and as I have said DPA has some great points, but fix them from within. Let DALPA do what it does best, negotiate a section six agreement. You have not even allowed that to happen.
No amount of biblical length rants on your part will change the following acl:

You support an organization that wants to grow the regionals while representing both regionals and majors.

You support an organization that states its highest priority in negotiations is to use all of its resources to ensure that local contracts aren't selfish and improve the entire profession as defined by ALPA.

You support an organization that tried to bust a union.

Utterly shameful.

Carl
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:58 AM
  #4628  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
In ain't Kool Aid. It is fact. Ask your Fed Ex friends what they though of their independent and why they are back in ALPA.
Ask your FedEx friends what they think of ALPA now that ALPA is trying to jam a TA down their throats with fear tactics. Sound familiar?

Carl
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 08:59 AM
  #4629  
TheManager's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Carl, I doubt a single poster on here works for ALPA or has any plans to work for ALPA. Your statement has zero validity.
No, Carls does have validity and your statement is completely false and misleading at best. Semantics is the game you prefer. We have moderators....perhaps not posters, that have ran for office and lost. They have also ran for committee positions and lost, and we have those that currently occupy committee position who moderate and post here.
Reply
Old 03-10-2011 | 09:05 AM
  #4630  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Is that a picture from a USAPA meeting? We all know they have really made progress.

They left ALPA and what do ya know, they're still on BK wages too!!! But their wages are much worse. E190 FO's cap out at $57 an hour & A320 FO's cap out at $86 an hour. Are they supporting an RJ union? Nope.

But clearly, leaving ALPA for USAPA has been effective. It's evident that they're not wasting any $$$.
Point #57 from the ALPA talking points: "Equate any attempt at an in-house union with USAPA."

You state talking points well johnso.

Carl
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices