Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2011, 12:32 PM
  #4961  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
ACL65,

Why do our Reps want to hear from us about RJet? What's for us to tell them? Is it their typical response to a scope violation, which is?

(1) Do you have incontrovertible evidence (that we can't sweep under the rug) ?
(2) If there is a scope violation found, what do you want for it ?

No other contractor of mine has billed me over $1,000 this year and followed up the bill with questions like, "you want me to do the job you paid me for, or just let it slide?"

The DPA is flat out not the answer, but as ALPA abdicates it's role as enforcer of our contract, the DPA is going to find more and more desperate converts.

Jet A in the wing at a rough average of $3.30 a gallon puts the question of furloughs and job protection provisions back on the table. As Boyd states "no airplane flying today was designed with these kind of fuel prices in mind."

Well, like any good pilot, I submitted my position along with supporting documentation. This time it was/ is by a neutral third party. It is up to them to decide.

What they decide will have ramifications, whether or not we pursue the claim.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:09 PM
  #4962  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 201
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Call your reps and tell them what you think. They have a Special Meeting tomorrow, and I know that many of them want more info on the RJET issue.
I did call my rep to voice my opinion. FWIW he was in agreement and agreed that some sort of explanation is in order. The local reps seem to be on board it's the MEC and National level that I'm worried about.
Maddoggin is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:19 PM
  #4963  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
My bet is that it's going to take longer than that to reach 6,500 cards, and as such, the vote will not take place until after the new contract is signed. It will be nice to have a new union in place then. A union that will actually defend the contract.



The 2018 time frame will depend on the company, the NMB, and DALPA. But it is an excellent plan to have a new union by then to defend the new contract. I'll be 60 in 2016 so I probably won't see very much of the new contract.

Carl
WOW, Carl. So is it your understanding that DPA will continue their card drive while we are in the middle of Section 6 negotiations? That's certainly a recipe to ensure failure for ALL Delta pilots. Hard to maximize our leverage if 2000 guys are trying to decertify the union's collective bargaining agent.

Nice.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:30 PM
  #4964  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
WOW, Carl. So is it your understanding that DPA will continue their card drive while we are in the middle of Section 6 negotiations? That's certainly a recipe to ensure failure for ALL Delta pilots. Hard to maximize our leverage if 2000 guys are trying to decertify the union's collective bargaining agent.

Nice.
It's not about a good contract. It's about being angry and hating ALPA. There are pilots doing ALPA work who don't do things the way Carl wants them done. If our next contract negotiation has to be hurt to make him feel better, then it's a small price to pay.
Karnak is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:33 PM
  #4965  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Uhh, tell me again how that little Texas union is doing with THEIR timeline? You know, the one that has clear concise concrete goals.... of a 50% payraise. How's that working for them?
I'd rather have clear concise goals than none. ALPA/DALPA has shown us nothing but an agenda they cannot share, and no defense of our current contract. Glad you're happy, but 2,300 of us so far are not.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:36 PM
  #4966  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Maddoggin View Post
I did call my rep to voice my opinion. FWIW he was in agreement and agreed that some sort of explanation is in order. The local reps seem to be on board it's the MEC and National level that I'm worried about.
If the local reps are truly on board, then the MEC has no choice but to move ahead...right? That's how our union is supposed to work...right?

Bueller, buuuuuuueller?

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:40 PM
  #4967  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Uhh, tell me again how that little Texas union is doing with THEIR timeline? You know, the one that has clear concise concrete goals.... of a 50% payraise. How's that working for them?
In other words, "If you aim at nothing, you'll hit your target every time." - ALPA playbook 3.2.1

Sorry, couldn't resist.
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:41 PM
  #4968  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
WOW, Carl. So is it your understanding that DPA will continue their card drive while we are in the middle of Section 6 negotiations?
Absolutely.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
That's certainly a recipe to ensure failure for ALL Delta pilots.
Anything except staying with ALPA no matter what is a recipe for disaster in your eyes.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Hard to maximize our leverage if 2000 guys are trying to decertify the union's collective bargaining agent.
You need to understand something: Our biggest battle is going to be to force our union to start acting like a union. The biggest leverage we're going to need, is leverage against ALPA. The company needs to understand that the membership is watching now, and the days of negotiating with "new style union leadership" may well be over. I know it's a difficult concept for you because of your love at all costs for ALPA, but...

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:50 PM
  #4969  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak View Post
It's not about a good contract. It's about being angry and hating ALPA.
You think that because you don't actually read the posts from whom you disagree with. Your blind rage takes over and, well...blinds you.

Originally Posted by Karnak View Post
There are pilots doing ALPA work who don't do things the way Carl wants them done.
I'm sure that's the case. I'm also sure there are pilots doing ALPA work that agree with my points exactly. But they also know what an uphill battle they face.

Originally Posted by Karnak View Post
If our next contract negotiation has to be hurt to make him feel better, then it's a small price to pay.
How goofy. Our next contract negotiations will be seriously damaged if our union goes in like the puppy dogs they've been so far. Not even enforcing our Section 1 is sending a terrible message of weakness to management prior to Section 6 beginning. A card drive to throw out the current weaklings is exactly the right message that BOTH SIDES of the table needs to produce the best contract.

But if the majority agrees to stick with ALPA, then so be it. Even though our next contract negotiations has to be hurt, it's a small price to pay for you to have stuck it out with ALPA to make you feel better.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-18-2011, 01:58 PM
  #4970  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Maddoggin View Post
I did call my rep to voice my opinion. FWIW he was in agreement and agreed that some sort of explanation is in order. The local reps seem to be on board it's the MEC and National level that I'm worried about.
Well those LEC Reps are the ones that will decide the fate of this. If they opt out, then others can take the action they see fit. It is all part of the mechanisms in place that we have all talked about.

Then again, I seriously doubt that the MEC Administration will not follow the will of the MEC Council. That right there is job suicide.
acl65pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices