Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2011 | 09:08 AM
  #4951  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Nice, 200 cards a month means we have 21 more months until they reach 6500. Give another 6 months for the election and we will be changing unions 7 months AFTER our amendable date. Excellent plan Carl, maybe we can have the contract sewn up by 2018 or so. Wait, will you be retired by then?

I'm guessing that is about when ALPA will produce one, so in reality it's a wash.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 09:24 AM
  #4952  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
If ALPA is this concerned about this, why are they not addressing it straight up. Their methods to date are confusing because they just help to legitimize DPA. Now is the time for ALPA to take the high road and s h o w everyone why they are the better choice. They need to listen to and react to the memebers collective wants and needs. Basically, they need to overhaul the way they have been conducting the pilots business.
You've clearly illustrated the box in which ALPA finds itself. They cannot divulge their strategy of accepting short term losses for their current members, in order to gain new members in the long term. The only thing they can do is to try and kill any opposition.

If ALPA continues to do nothing except slander their opposition, DPA will get elected because Delta pilots will be disgusted with the ALPA slander and lack of contract defense. If ALPA admits their real agenda, DPA will get elected because no Delta pilot wants to see the contract go unenforced so that other non-ALPA members can benefit.

It's a true no-win situation for ALPA and one that is entirely self inflicted.

Carl
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 09:25 AM
  #4953  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
If that's what you think you're doing, I hope you keep at it. It is so illustrative for people out there to see a DALPA worker in action. You're so good for the DPA.

Even better. Please continue.

Asked and answered.

That's easy. When DPA gets 6,500 cards...that's the timeline. They either will or they won't. In the meantime you get to sharpen your slander skills, instead of defending Section 1.

People other than you would be signing up for a process whereby the pilots determine what the constitution and by-laws are. If 6,500 cards are obtained, there will be an election. If DPA is chosen as the new union, more elections will begin. Delta pilots will choose each leader and a new constitution. Is this really so hard for you to get?

Because it's smart for any organization to know if they have someone in their ranks that is trying to destroy them. That's just basic.

Because the 12,500 pilots of Delta Air Lines haven't elected them yet. Don't you remember a class in critical thinking when you were at college?

Ah yes. Straight from the DALPA communications talking points. The DPA is only made of North pilots who's secret agenda is to decertify ALPA for the express purpose of re-arbitrating the seniority list. Are you the same DALPA guy that is claiming DALPA can't defend RAH's Section 1 violation because it could mean that we'd have to integrate the Comair pilots onto the Delta seniority list? Such a rich imagination. If only you would put those energies into defending Section 1.

Carl
Wrong again, Carl. I never made any such claim about Comair and don't make it today. By the way, slander is spoken and libel is written, so if you are going to accuse me of something, at least use the right accusation. The best defense against a libel case is the truth.

The truth is:

Despite DPA's claims of having a full organization ready to go from day one, we have no idea who these people are. They are hiding from the rest of their fellow pilots.

Carl supports Delta pilots ratting out their fellow pilots to MANAGEMENT as long as their little feelings were hurt in a stupid internet cartoon. What next, is the DPA going to start riding jumpseats and rat finking on pilots who oppose them?

DPA has reneged on every promise they ever made to their supporters about drafting and writing a constitution and publicly staffing their organization. Instead of meeting their promised timelines, they simply erased them from history.

DPA is afraid of dissent within their organization and has purged their membership of anyone who might disagree with them.

DPA has hired the law firm that is attempting to overturn a final and binding arbitration award and yet they don't mention seniority ever on their website. All they need to do is put out an official position of what they stand for.

Those are the facts, Jack, and you can accuse me of slander (libel) all day and the truth wins every time. Being a shill for DPA must be very tiring for you Carl, you are off your game.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 09:29 AM
  #4954  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I'm guessing that is about when ALPA will produce one, so in reality it's a wash.

You're unfortunately likely right. If ALPA's recent history in gaining contracts through Section 6 is any indication, we're looking at a good 5-7 year fight... at least. Lately, it's taken mergers to get any progress going.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 09:55 AM
  #4955  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Wrong again, Carl. I never made any such claim about Comair and don't make it today.
I asked the question: "Are you the same guy". It was a rhetorical question because I couldn't be sure you'd read your latest talking points.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
By the way, slander is spoken and libel is written, so if you are going to accuse me of something, at least use the right accusation. The best defense against a libel case is the truth.
I'm certain you do both. But you're correct that I should have used the correct term when dealing with the posting portion of your attacks...as opposed to the verbal.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
The truth is:

Despite DPA's claims of having a full organization ready to go from day one, we have no idea who these people are. They are hiding from the rest of their fellow pilots.
Day 1 is when ALPA is decertified, and all leadership is elected by Delta pilots. Thus, they will indeed be ready on day 1.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Carl supports Delta pilots ratting out their fellow pilots to MANAGEMENT as long as their little feelings were hurt in a stupid internet cartoon.
Carl doesn't support ratting out. I especially dislike DALPA guys running to ATL MANAGEMENT dozens of times whenever they thought they saw a violation of policy or agreement.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
What next, is the DPA going to start riding jumpseats and rat finking on pilots who oppose them?
ALPA/alfaromeo's new slogan: "Vote DPA and have rat finking pilots ride your jumpseat!!!" You really couldn't do a better job of advocacy for DPA. But be sure to tell us what DALPA guys were doing "rat finking" constantly to ATL MANAGEMENT every time they perceived a violation of policy or agreement? Is it just different and OK when DALPA does it?

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
DPA has reneged on every promise they ever made to their supporters about drafting and writing a constitution and publicly staffing their organization. Instead of meeting their promised timelines, they simply erased them from history.
Those were never portrayed as promises. They were portrayed as goals to be attained. The actual attainment of 6,500 cards was always going to be the final determinant.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
DPA is afraid of dissent within their organization and has purged their membership of anyone who might disagree with them.
Totally false. But ALPA/DALPA does that to this day.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
DPA has hired the law firm that is attempting to overturn a final and binding arbitration award and yet they don't mention seniority ever on their website. All they need to do is put out an official position of what they stand for.
ALPA's legal team tried to bust a union. And lost. Where is THAT on the ALPA website? DPA's law firm was also hired by USAPA to decertify ALPA. They won against the ALPA lawyers...but that's not saying much. The attempt at overturning an arbitration is being done by the pilots of USAPA. Do you think a majority of pilots at Delta want the seniority list re-arbitrated. You DO understand that it would take a majority vote of all Delta pilots to do that...don't you? You DO know that no law firm could make that happen because they wanted to...don't you?

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Those are the facts, Jack, and you can accuse me of slander (libel) all day and the truth wins every time.
The truth does win every time. ALPA is in such trouble right now because they can't state the truth. They can only have their minions like you attack after reading the daily talking points.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Being a shill for DPA must be very tiring for you Carl, you are off your game.
I'm a strong proponent of leaving ALPA for ANY in-house union whereby only Delta pilots are involved in representing the interests of only Delta pilots. DPA or not, doesn't matter. Just so long as it's in-house...and not ALPA.

Carl
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 11:49 AM
  #4956  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Maddoggin
You know though. Whether DPA is the answer or not I don't know. But it is serving a purpose. By giving an option of another union out there it puts pressure on ALPA to address issues just due to the fact that if they don't they might lose some support and give a little bit of momentum to this new union push. Take the RAH scope issue. ALPA in no way shape or form wants to deal with this or make a statement in any way. I have no confidence that they would try and fight for our scope protection in this instance. However, with having another union that could gain ground if they don't address this problem it raises the stakes for ALPA. They are forced to deal with it. Its sad that this is one of the main motivations for ALPA and that they think how can we handle this without losing anybody to DPA. I still don't think anything will come of the RAH thing, even though I think it's a blatant violation of our section 1, but if it does I think DPA would be one of the reasons.

Call your reps and tell them what you think. They have a Special Meeting tomorrow, and I know that many of them want more info on the RJET issue.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 12:12 PM
  #4957  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Call your reps and tell them what you think. They have a Special Meeting tomorrow, and I know that many of them want more info on the RJET issue.
ACL65,

Why do our Reps want to hear from us about RJet? What's for us to tell them? Is it their typical response to a scope violation:

(1) Do you have incontrovertible evidence (that we can't sweep under the rug) ?
(2) If there is a scope violation found, what do you want for it ?

No other contractor of mine has billed me over $1,000 this year and followed up the bill with questions like, "you want me to do the job you paid me for, or just let it slide?"

The DPA is flat out not the answer, but as ALPA abdicates it's role as enforcer of our contract, the DPA is going to find more and more desperate converts.

Jet A in the wing at a rough average of $3.30 a gallon puts the question of furloughs and job protection provisions back on the table. As Boyd states "no airplane flying today was designed with these kind of fuel prices in mind."

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 04-18-2011 at 12:31 PM.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 12:16 PM
  #4958  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Like DALPA sending a constant stream of evidence to ATL management to try to eliminate DPA. And who could forget, taking pictures of Delta pilots lke they were scabs crossing a picket line.
Carl
Nice diversion attempt from a DPA apologist. Nevermind the fact that DPA was taking pictures, running to management telling them that ALPA was intimidating them by simply being in the lounge, which they have every right to be and working feverishly to squash free speech and get a fellow pilot potentially fired, by running to management with the pilots name, because he put out a cartoon on youtube refuting DPA's claims and shining a light of truth on their misrepresentations.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 12:19 PM
  #4959  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Again, you nor I were not there. Unless you can provide the actual deposition that certifies the facts, you are speculating.
You assume too much. Besides, DPA brags about dropping a dime on a fellow pilot.
Reply
Old 04-18-2011 | 12:19 PM
  #4960  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
You're unfortunately likely right. If ALPA's recent history in gaining contracts through Section 6 is any indication, we're looking at a good 5-7 year fight... at least. Lately, it's taken mergers to get any progress going.
Uhh, tell me again how that little Texas union is doing with THEIR timeline? You know, the one that has clear concise concrete goals.... of a 50% payraise. How's that working for them?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices