Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2011, 12:12 PM
  #4461  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

DAL88, get involved and raise heck if you think the current group isn't cutting it.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 12:37 PM
  #4462  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
DAL88, get involved and raise heck if you think the current group isn't cutting it.
Standard DALPA talking point response.

I know you're all plugged in and immersed in ALPA now. But not all of us are going to serve in some official capacity. What we CAN all do is make sure our reps get our input and "raise heck" when we get results like we've been getting. I think I've filled that square pretty thoroughly.

Now, having said that, I am encouraged by what appears to be a somewhat new direction from the current MEC makeup. I'm a results oriented person... so the jury's still out. It appears they can at least talk the talk. (Which is more than the previous group could do.) Soon we will see if they can walk the walk.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 02:31 PM
  #4463  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
Standard DALPA talking point response.

I know you're all plugged in and immersed in ALPA now. But not all of us are going to serve in some official capacity. What we CAN all do is make sure our reps get our input and "raise heck" when we get results like we've been getting. I think I've filled that square pretty thoroughly.

Now, having said that, I am encouraged by what appears to be a somewhat new direction from the current MEC makeup. I'm a results oriented person... so the jury's still out. It appears they can at least talk the talk. (Which is more than the previous group could do.) Soon we will see if they can walk the walk.
88,

I think his point is, its really easy to sit on the couch on Sunday and when your favorite team loses, explain what the coach should have done to prevent that. It's a bit tougher to be the coach standing in the position to make those calls each play, and achieve the outcome that appears so obvious, when viewed from the couch.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 02:44 PM
  #4464  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
88,

I think his point is, its really easy to sit on the couch on Sunday and when your favorite team loses, explain what the coach should have done to prevent that. It's a bit tougher to be the coach standing in the position to make those calls each play, and achieve the outcome that appears so obvious, when viewed from the couch.
So there's not really any point to providing input to our reps, right? I mean, if we can only get things done by serving in some official ALPA capacity, then either all 12,000+ of us need to be serving (who's going to fly the airplanes?), or those of us who are not serving in an official capacity need to shut up and quit Monday morning quarterbacking. Is that what you're saying?
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 02:53 PM
  #4465  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
Standard DALPA talking point response.

I know you're all plugged in and immersed in ALPA now. But not all of us are going to serve in some official capacity. What we CAN all do is make sure our reps get our input and "raise heck" when we get results like we've been getting. I think I've filled that square pretty thoroughly.

Now, having said that, I am encouraged by what appears to be a somewhat new direction from the current MEC makeup. I'm a results oriented person... so the jury's still out. It appears they can at least talk the talk. (Which is more than the previous group could do.) Soon we will see if they can walk the walk.
Same old talking points from someone that wants change an their direction, but does not want to get their hands dirty.

I mean that. If you want what you want, then you need to get involved, sacrifice the time, and do the work. It was how my bluff was called, and frankly I am glad I did.

BTW, still just a line guy.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 02:54 PM
  #4466  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
So there's not really any point to providing input to our reps, right? I mean, if we can only get things done by serving in some official ALPA capacity, then either all 12,000+ of us need to be serving (who's going to fly the airplanes?), or those of us who are not serving in an official capacity need to shut up and quit Monday morning quarterbacking. Is that what you're saying?
Drama. That is one way to get involved. An other is to become a rep and do the work. Heck do P2P. It is a low time commitment.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 03:02 PM
  #4467  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Same old talking points from someone that wants change an their direction, but does not want to get their hands dirty.
That's an inaccurate statement and you know it. I'm an adult and an independent thinker. I will pick and choose when and how I "get my hands dirty."

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
I mean that. If you want what you want, then you need to get involved, sacrifice the time, and do the work. It was how my bluff was called, and frankly I am glad I did.
I'm not. I think your thoughts have been corrupted. You should have stayed with your gut instincts.

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
BTW, still just a line guy.
While you may not hold an official title at this point in time, I think it's quite obvious that your intentions are not to be "just a line guy" when it comes to ALPA stuff.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 03:04 PM
  #4468  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
Same old talking points from someone that wants change an their direction, but does not want to get their hands dirty.

I mean that. If you want what you want, then you need to get involved, sacrifice the time, and do the work. It was how my bluff was called, and frankly I am glad I did.

BTW, still just a line guy.
How close did you come to getting on the committee?
scambo1 is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 03:06 PM
  #4469  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver View Post
So there's not really any point to providing input to our reps, right? I mean, if we can only get things done by serving in some official ALPA capacity, then either all 12,000+ of us need to be serving (who's going to fly the airplanes?), or those of us who are not serving in an official capacity need to shut up and quit Monday morning quarterbacking. Is that what you're saying?
Of course not; but then again, you knew that.

Providing input is one thing -- asking tough questions is perfectly fine. Holding your leaders accountable is of course acceptable too. But continually Monday morning quarterbacking as if you could do something better gets old really quick, as you have ZERO basis to justify that your position would yield better results than the current path.

Everything is hypothetical to those who never get involved.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 02-24-2011, 03:19 PM
  #4470  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Of course not; but then again, you knew that.

Providing input is one thing -- asking tough questions is perfectly fine. Holding your leaders accountable is of course acceptable too. But continually Monday morning quarterbacking as if you could do something better gets old really quick, as you have ZERO basis to justify that your position would yield better results than the current path.
So who gets to determine where to draw the line between providing input/holding leaders accountable and Monday morning quarterbacking? If there is "ZERO basis" to justify a different approach, then what's the point of providing input if it differs from the current path? Still sounds to me like you think any of us who disagree with the current path should either shut up and color and leave everything to our elected reps who know better, or do everything ourselves. I don't see any room in your argument for the "bottom up" input/accountability process ALPA is supposed to be using.

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Everything is hypothetical to those who never get involved.
There's that favorite talking point again.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices